Catholic school vice principal dismissed for being in gay "marriage"

[Big Money]

Is this you violating Rule 12 again in an attempt to be humorous. You are disgusting. You have been reported

You should not quote the rule-breakers' post.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Would insisting that one cannot be an obese homosexual be logical?

I have not seen anyone insist that a child molester cannot be gay. But the relevance of their sexual orientation to their pedophilia is the same as the relevance of their obesity to their homosexuality.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

I explained the difference several pages ago. You simply choose not to acknowledge it in order to further your own agenda. You are blatantly dishonest about the subject.

PMP is adamantly against gay marriage. But he is honest about it and does try and malign homosexuality with dishonest statements.

I am not maligning homosexuals.

Allow me to explain it so even you can understand.

If a grown woman sexually assaults only young girls, she is a pedophile and a homosexual. She is a homosexual per Websters definition

If a grown man sexually assaults only young boys, he is a pedophile and a homosexual. He is a homosexual per Websters definition

If a grown woman only sexually assaults young boys, she is a pedophile and a heterosexual.

Main Entry: ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·ty
Pronunciation: \ˌhō-mə-ˌsek-shə-ˈwa-lə-tē\
Function: noun
Date: 1892
1 : the quality or state of being homosexual 2 : erotic activity with another of the same sex

Take it up with Webster. You don't see any distinction with regards to age from Webster do you?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Hey look. Pilsbury is being funny again while violating Rule 12. How long should the ban be this time?

Are you going to hold your breath until I am banned? Yes, please do that.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

I am not maligning homosexuals.

Allow me to explain it so even you can understand.

If a grown woman sexually assaults only young girls, she is a pedophile and a homosexual. She is a homosexual per Websters definition

If a grown man sexually assaults only young boys, he is a pedophile and a homosexual. He is a homosexual per Websters definition

If a grown woman only sexually assaults young boys, she is a pedophile and a heterosexual.

Main Entry: ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·ty
Pronunciation: \ˌhō-mə-ˌsek-shə-ˈwa-lə-tē\
Function: noun
Date: 1892
1 : the quality or state of being homosexual 2 : erotic activity with another of the same sex

Take it up with Webster. You don't see any distinction with regards to age from Webster do you?

And someone who is attracted to prepubescent children is not attracted based on their sexual orientation. They are attracted to them BECAUSE they are children.

 

[Big Money]

I have not seen anyone insist that a child molester cannot be gay.

But the relevance of their sexual orientation to their pedophilia is the same as the relevance of their obesity to their homosexuality.

It is?

Then perhaps you can provide what PMP could not: evidence that molesters exercise no gender-based victim preference?

 

[Big Money]

And someone who is attracted to prepubescent children can be attracted based on their sexual orientation. They are attracted to them BECAUSE they are male or female children.

FTFY

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

It is?

Then perhaps you can provide what PMP could not: evidence that molesters exercise no gender-based victim preference?

I have provided sound reasoning as to why boys are molested more.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Good luck with that.

Don't let your hatred of me blind you to the ZERO policy of rule 12 here. You would think you previous banning would have taught you that. I don't know if you will be banned for your vague attempt at calling me a pedophile but you will get a warning. That I can guarentee. I have seen warnings for less blatant references.

You can take that to the bank Pilsbury

 

[Big Money]

I have provided my opinion unsupported by any statistics as to why I asserted baselessly that boys are molested more.

FYFY

 

[Damocles]

Isn't he a homosexual pedophile?

No. In order to be homosexual the chronophilia needs to be out of the picture. Since there is exclusivity by age the sexuality is pedophilia and not homosexuality, it would not be heterosexuality either if the priest chose to molest little girls.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

FTFY

Changing someone's quote is OK with you? Good to know.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Are you going to hold your breath until I am banned? Yes, please do that.

You may or may not be banned. That is up to the mods. I am sure they may cut you some slack. But a sharp slap on the wrist is coming your way.

In fact you are implicitly admitting what you did. Maybe you don't think rule 12 applies to you?

It is ashame you can't discuss this without resorting to calling someone a pedophile.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Don't let your hatred of me blind you to the ZERO policy of rule 12 here. You would think you previous banning would have taught you that. I don't know if you will be banned for your vague attempt at calling me a pedophile but you will get a warning. That I can guarentee. I have seen warnings for less blatant references.

You can take that to the bank Pilsbury

Did I call you a pedophile? No, I did not.

 

[Big Money]

I have provided sound reasoning as to why boys are molested more.

Females are 5 times more likely to be abused than males (Sedlack, et. al., 2010).


http://cachouston.org/child-sexual-abuse-facts/

 

[canceled.2021.1]

No. In order to be homosexual the chronophilia needs to be out of the picture. Since there is exclusivity by age the sexuality is pedophilia and not homosexuality, it would not be heterosexuality either if the priest chose to molest little girls.

Where is this exclusivity by age defined? Webster doesn't break homosexuality down by age. It seems to be something you are making up on the fly

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

You may or may not be banned. That is up to the mods. I am sure they may cut you some slack. But a sharp slap on the wrist is coming your way.

In fact you are implicitly admitting what you did. Maybe you don't think rule 12 applies to you?

It is ashame you can't discuss this without resorting to calling someone a pedophile.

Perhaps I am not worried because I did not call you a pedophile?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Did I call you a pedophile? No, I did not.

You made an implication no matter how thinly veiled and you know it

 

[Big Money]

Changing someone's quote is OK with you? Good to know.

I know how important being correct is to you. No need to thank me.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

They are acceptable to me. But I suppose it is possible that ILA is stimulated by looking at 7 year old girls. I choose to give him the benefit of the doubt. If you do not, that is entirely up to you?

Damo if these types of posts are allowed I would like to know.