The Hildebeast says Benghazi is her greatest regret

aeprga said:
Yeah, you're a goddamned idiot.
Click to expand...

For reading a link provided by another poster and telling them what it says? Right...

You have to be part of the 15 total people who still believe that the attacks on the Consulate outbuilding were caused by a stupid video that the administration seized on to blame in an attempt to distract from the fact that terrorism was still happening during a campaign year where the Obama was trying to tell us Al-Qaeda was weak and attacks like this couldn't happen.

Sip that bathwater... sip on friend. At least we know where you sit before you tell us where you stand.
 
Damocles said:
For reading a link provided by another poster and telling them what it says? Right...

You have to be part of the 15 total people who still believe that the attacks on the Consulate outbuilding were caused by a stupid video that the administration seized on to blame in an attempt to distract from the fact that terrorism was still happening during a campaign year where the Obama was trying to tell us Al-Qaeda was weak and attacks like this couldn't happen.

Sip that bathwater... sip on friend. At least we know where you sit before you tell us where you stand.
Click to expand...


Actually, I don't believe that. At all. My only point, as reflected in Post #74 and others, is that you are a fucking idiot, willfully ignorant of facts that don't comport to your worldview.

There is no dispute that the violent protest in Cairo on September 11, 2012 was in part in reaction to the film. You should really try to work this fact into your tirade, because otherwise you will remain a fucking idiot.
 
aeprga said:
The reality, Damo, is that there isn't much question at all that the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were in part in reaction to the film. The idea that a person who violates the terms of their parole leading to violent demonstrations based in part on the parole violation would not have his parole revoked is . . . interesting.
Click to expand...

Is that why the protestors took down the American flag and raised the Al Qaeda flag in its place after they climbed over the walls of the Egyptian embassy?

Cairo Protesters Raise Al Qaeda Flag over US Embassy
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/11/Cairo-Protesters-Raise-Al-Qaeda-Flag-over-US-Embassy

Another myth that has never been proven with anything other than heresay and hyperbolic rhetoric.
 
christiefan915 said:
You're making an argument for the possibility that the Benghazi attack could not have been prevented no matter what. More security or less security, it's always possible to breach security. After all wasn't bin Laden's compound supposed to be uber-secure? Yet we got inside.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is always possible to devise a plan to breach security. That was not the point. He stated that those 13 were the same as Benghazi. They were not. Only ONE actually breached the security perimeter. Not 13... ONE.

With Benghazi, it was made known that it was not secure, that security was not sufficient. The attack proved that warning correct.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes, it is always possible to devise a plan to breach security. That was not the point. He stated that those 13 were the same as Benghazi. They were not. Only ONE actually breached the security perimeter. Not 13... ONE.

With Benghazi, it was made known that it was not secure, that security was not sufficient. The attack proved that warning correct.
Click to expand...

and, as we know, hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20. Looking back, I am sure that the FBI wished they had paid more attention to arabs learning to fly airplanes.... but they didn't. damn.
 
maineman said:
and, as we know, hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20. Looking back, I am sure that the FBI wished they had paid more attention to arabs learning to fly airplanes.... but they didn't. damn.
Click to expand...

Which again is not the point. The point is that he stated the 13 were the same as Benghazi... they were not. 12 of them not even close.

Arabs flying planes is hardly the same either. Even if you knew that a few Arabs would eventually fly planes into buildings, the only way that knowledge could have been used to prevent 9/11 is if all Arabs were denied the right to fly planes or fly on planes. Whereas security could easily have been added to Benghazi upon request.
 
maineman said:
and, as we know, hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20. Looking back, I am sure that the FBI wished they had paid more attention to arabs learning to fly airplanes.... but they didn't. damn.
Click to expand...

It isn't about hindsight you dishonest thread trolling dunce; it is about them not doing ANYTHING and the subsequent efforts to cover it up as some protest which we NOW know was a lie as well.

They knew from the beginning it had NOTHING to do with the video or the film.

But alas, you're a dishonest hyper partisan dunce devoted to that special brand of stupid you bring to the forum.
 
Big Money said:
Clinton-Benghazi-G1-620x362.jpeg


DEMOCRAT​




Clinton called the deadly attack on the United States mission in Benghazi her “biggest regret” in the four years she served as secretary of state.


“It was a terrible tragedy losing four Americans, two diplomats, and now it is public so I can say two C.I.A. operatives”.




http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/us/politics/clinton-calls-benghazi-attack-her-biggest-regret-as-secretary.html
Click to expand...

Since it makes her unelectable, then I can see why she says that.

That, and her predatory husband.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top