The Hildebeast says Benghazi is her greatest regret

[christiefan915]

No I don't. One theory has nothing to do with the other.

"Right" is wrong. Both lists are about two politicians who supposedly did away with their enemies.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I'm pretty darned sure she's going to face some opposition in the primaries. I can see Evan Bayh maybe running, a few others. This assumption that HillBillary will be the nominee is a bit premature.

it could have been golden....sucks that she isn't clean, well dressed or articulate........

 

[PostmodernProphet]

There is a sense amongst democrats that I know, that it is her time, however.

what's that I hear?.....2007?.....

 

[MAGA MAN]

"Right" is wrong. Both lists are about two politicians who supposedly did away with their enemies.

So what? One could be true while the other false. Your logic sucks.

 

[christiefan915]

So what? One could be true while the other false. Your logic sucks.

Absolutely correct. The Clinton one could be false and the bush one could be true but you'd never admit it.

 

[Big Money]

If I gave you a list for the nth time would you accept it?

Let's see it first.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Absolutely correct. The Clinton one could be false and the bush one could be true but you'd never admit it.

I'd admit it if it were true, but it is more likely the other way around. That's based on the obvious vindictiveness of the former first lady...

 

[Big Money]

I inferred it, given that they're all in the Clinton body count list.

Inference requires evidence and reasoning, doesn't it?

 

[christiefan915]

I'd admit it if it were true, but it is more likely the other way around. That's based on the obvious vindictiveness of the former first lady...

Show me the money. Just don't quote WorldNutDaily or some other RW rag. Because her so-called vindictiveness is a figment of con imaginations.

 

[christiefan915]

Inference requires evidence and reasoning, doesn't it?

And the evidence has all been reasoned out but I'll cliff it for you: correlation does not imply causation.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Show me the money. Just don't quote WorldNutDaily or some other RW rag. Because her so-called vindictiveness is a figment of con imaginations.

Her vindictiveness is legendary, and needs no cited evidence here. In fact would put her squarely to blame for the decline of rational debate between the two parties, since the first Clinton term.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

And the evidence has all been reasoned out but I'll cliff it for you: correlation does not imply causation.

Yes that is true that correlation is not causation. I wish people would be consistent with that, but alas some are very selective about the correlation they attribute to causation

 

[Big Money]

And the evidence has all been reasoned out but I'll cliff it for you: correlation does not imply causation.

Your reasoning is flawed. Deal with it.

 

[tinfoil]

heheheheheheheheheh

What a partisan old fool you are

 

[christiefan915]

Her vindictiveness is legendary, and needs no cited evidence here. In fact would put her squarely to blame for the decline of rational debate between the two parties, since the first Clinton term.

In other words, you've got nothing.

 

[MAGA MAN]

In other words, you've got nothing.

No, it's just a waste of time linking to the obvious...

 

[tinfoil]

methinks that big phony has a secret crush on Hillary.

You're like 65 going on 16
What an immature hack you are

 

[Big Money]

Where's that list of The Hildebeast of Benghazis' accomplishments?

 

[maineman]

why would you want a list of her accomplishments? would they make you consider voting for her?

 

[Big Money]

why would you want a list of her accomplishments? would they make you consider voting for her?

So either you can't produce one, or don't want to because you know how ridiculous it will look?