Denmark passes controversial bill to seize assets and valuables from refugees

Toby451 said:
sure, and things worked out so well in Yugoslavia didn't they....
Click to expand...

Charleston church shooting suspect Dylann Roof wore white supremacist apartheid-era flag patches on jacket

rhodesia.jpg


TOBY ROOF
 
moon2012 said:
Ask the birds.

They are refugees because ' we ' have destroyed their homes. Moral; Don't kick a termites' nest with bare feet.
Click to expand...

They are fleeing radical Islamic barbarians and heading to Europe; and they're bringing some of their barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes with them. These people aren't westerners, they come from a part of the world where women are looked upon as chattel. You just can't allow great numbers of them in and think things will be honky-dory.

Some of the European leaders are afflicted with the same insanity as you. Fortunately, 'xenophobia' [aka coming to your senses on immigration lol] is breaking out so Europe may be able to right the ship before it's too late.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
They are fleeing radical Islamic barbarians and heading to Europe; and they're bringing some of their barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes with them. These people aren't westerners, they come from a part of the world where women are looked upon as chattel. You just can't allow great numbers of them in and think things will be honky-dory.

Some of the European leaders are afflicted with the same insanity as you. Fortunately, 'xenophobia' [aka coming to your senses on immigration lol] is breaking out so Europe may be able to right the ship before it's too late.
Click to expand...

Let's look at the comic aspects of your xenophobia.
For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
In general terms that should permit you to accept roughly two-thirds of the refugees on the grounds that they don't fit your profile for rejection.
Thirdly, to attempt to claim that 100% of all the adult male refugees ' treat women like chattels ' and have ' barbaric and uncivilised cultural ...er... attributes [sic] ' would be plain silly just in mathematical terms, let alone allowing for the fact that you probably haven't met even one of them let alone 100%
Of course, it isn't really comic. It's pathetic. People shouldn't laugh at pathos.
 
moon2012 said:
Let's look at the comic aspects of your xenophobia.
For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
In general terms that should permit you to accept roughly two-thirds of the refugees on the grounds that they don't fit your profile for rejection.
Thirdly, to attempt to claim that 100% of all the adult male refugees ' treat women like chattels ' and have ' barbaric and uncivilised cultural ...er... attributes [sic] ' would be plain silly just in mathematical terms, let alone allowing for the fact that you probably haven't met even one of them let alone 100%
Of course, it isn't really comic. It's pathetic. People shouldn't laugh at pathos.
Click to expand...

Jeez, you are so full of shit!! Those "children" living Sweden especially in Stockholm station are mainly Moroccan teen gangs. They have entered the EU via Ceuta and Melilla, the two Spanish enclaves in Morocco and then onto Spain. They have lived on the streets virtually all their lives, are illiterate and live off their wits by mugging people. The vast majority of migrants are not Syrian and the ones that are mainly comprise deserting soldiers. I would not be against genuine children up to the age of 12 being accepted but most of those are in fact in refugee camps in the Middle East. Of course somebody as full of agitprop bullshit as you would never ask the question why they ended in Sweden having transited through Denmark, a country that most people would be more than happy to live in. Well my fine feathered friend, it is because the benefits in Sweden are more generous, so that tells me immediately that they are economic migrants not genuine refugees for the most part.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...n-“take-over”-stockholm-train-station-steal-g
 
Last edited:
Borboletta said:
Jeez, you are so full of shit!! Those "children" living Sweden especially in Stockholm station are mainly Moroccan teen gangs. They have entered the EU via Ceuta and Melilla, the two Spanish enclaves in Morocco and then onto Spain. They have lived on the streets virtually all their lives, are illiterate and live off their wits by mugging people. The vast majority of migrants are not Syrian and the ones that are mainly comprise deserting soldiers. I would not be against genuine children up to the age of 12 being accepted but most of those are in fact in refugee camps in the Middle East. Of course somebody as full of agitprop bullshit as you would never ask the question why they ended in Sweden having transited through Denmark, a country that most people would be more than happy to live in. Well my fine feathered friend, it is because the benefits in Sweden are far generous, so that tells me immediately that they are economic migrants not genuine refugees for the most part.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...n-“take-over”-stockholm-train-station-steal-g
Click to expand...

We can only be thankful that you, and malicious views such as yours, are representative of a sick section of society which is a small minority . You're free to mouth this intolerant filth, certainly, and it will serve to identify you at some future point when fascists are again required to answer to civilised society.
 
moon2012 said:
Let's look at the comic aspects of your xenophobia.
For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
Click to expand...

Why should the taxpayer have to fund these people?
 
moon2012 said:
We can only be thankful that you, and malicious views such as yours, are representative of a sick section of society which is a small minority . You're free to mouth this intolerant filth, certainly, and it will serve to identify you at some future point when fascists are again required to answer to civilised society.
Click to expand...

What a load of pompous pretentious piffle.
 
moon2012 said:
We can only be thankful that you, and malicious views such as yours, are representative of a sick section of society which is a small minority . You're free to mouth this intolerant filth, certainly, and it will serve to identify you at some future point when fascists are again required to answer to civilised society.
Click to expand...

funny how you SJW types always want to put foreigners ahead of your own people, how does that work for you?
 
Let's review some of the comic aspects of xenophobia;

For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
In general terms that should permit you to accept roughly two-thirds of the refugees on the grounds that they don't fit your profile for rejection.
Thirdly, to attempt to claim that 100% of all the adult male refugees ' treat women like chattels ' and have ' barbaric and uncivilised cultural ...er... attributes [sic] ' would be plain silly just in mathematical terms, let alone allowing for the fact that you probably haven't met even one of them let alone 100%
Of course, it isn't really comic. It's pathetic. People shouldn't laugh at pathos.
 
Toby451 said:
funny how you SJW types always want to put foreigners ahead of your own people, how does that work for you?
Click to expand...

I don't have any of ' my own people '. I'm human.

However, if I were a doctor I'd be inclined towards treating a wounded elephant before a human fascist.
 
moon2012 said:
We can only be thankful that you, and malicious views such as yours, are representative of a sick section of society which is a small minority . You're free to mouth this intolerant filth, certainly, and it will serve to identify you at some future point when fascists are again required to answer to civilised society.
Click to expand...
Pompous wanker!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top