Simple solutions to school shootings

Taichiliberal said:
You refer to the bunch of willfully ignorant, paranoid and bigoted clowns who refuse to acknowledge or don't realize that an AWB does NOT "grab their guns" or magically lessen the effectiveness of the plethora of handguns, rifles and shotguns currently available. Although many members of Congress are bought and paid for by the NRA, the majority of it's members are FOR gun control amendments that the NRA leadership lobby against! Don't take my word for it, do some honest research on it.
Click to expand...

I could care less for that bunch of NRA butter nutters, i'm talking about the unseen thousands of people who have them and are constitutionally bound to be defiant to the end. WHAT DO YOU DO??????
 
Taichiliberal said:
What's to explain? You're talking about ILLEGAL transactions....hell, cops have been trying to stop the "Saturday Night Special" type dealings for decades....but it's hard to do when some joker can just bop to a state with minimum requirements for purchasing and then sneak them into another state with more stricter rules (see stories about the "iron pipe line" and NYC).
Click to expand...

the above is one of the main reasons there can be no debate.......it's because you're clueless how gun sales work. the FEDERAL background check is the same in every state. it's not more lax in one state than another because it's FEDERAL

really, you should quit while you're just a little behind.
 
Taichiliberal said:
As I have NEVER advocated for "just banning guns", as the AWB and gun control is about NOT selling specific category of weapons to the general public. You do realize that by law military issued weapons are for military use only even though they are made by private companies. So don't bandy about the phrase "banning guns", because that can be misleading.
Click to expand...

If you are for reinstating the AWB that means you are in favor of banning guns. General public, these guns are banned from being purchased by you. I lived through the Clinton AWB. Had a gun that was grandfathered in. Here is what it looked like:

vpj5.jpg


After the ban went into effect you couldn’t buy them. They quit manufacturing them. They were banned. I’m not bandying about anything here. Just calling a spade a spade.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Really? Care to provide proof that one could buy an AR-15 (style) weapon under the AWB? because that would mean the manufacturer tried subterfuge to skirt the law. Did you look into legal wrangling that happened over such? Bet you didn't.
Click to expand...

the AWB had to define what it prohibited. After the list of defining characteristics were prohibited, a simple cosmetic change to the weapon made it perfectly legal to sell.
 
leaningright said:
If you are for reinstating the AWB that means you are in favor of banning guns. General public, these guns are banned from being purchased by you. I lived through the Clinton AWB. Had a gun that was grandfathered in. Here is what it looked like:

vpj5.jpg


After the ban went into effect you couldn’t buy them. They quit manufacturing them. They were banned. I’m not bandying about anything here. Just calling a spade a spade.
Click to expand...

looks kinda "old school cool".....
 
CFM said:
Life it hard if you're stupid. You should try not to be stupid. However, being what you are automatically makes you that way, boy, and there's nothing you can do to change it.

Care to address the content of the post or divert because you're a pussy?
Click to expand...

I am smarter that you, racist scumbag...
lol
 
Taichiliberal said:
No stupid, I'm telling you that if Cruz could not buy that gun at all through a dealership, he most likely would NOT have paid a higher price from a private seller (or illegal seller, if he could find one). But folk like you want to make it and keep it easier FOR A WEAPON THAT IS UNNECESSARY GIVEN THE PLETHORA OF GUNS AVAILABLE THAT ARE NOT ON THE AWB LIST.

Got that, bunky?
Click to expand...

Still didn't answer the question. But nice try.
 
leaningright said:
Only weird-o’s like you (anti-gunners) would characterize a person enjoying fine weaponry in such a way. What is it you say? .... Bugger off now...
Click to expand...

I'll bugger off when I'm good and ready. Get back under the bed with your armoury, and have a merry night! :)
 
iolo said:
I'll bugger off when I'm good and ready. Get back under the bed with your armoury, and have a merry night! :)
Click to expand...

Lol...getting ready to start my day...headed to work to teach some children some maths. You have a merry night. ;)
 
leaningright said:
Lol...getting ready to start my day...headed to work to teach some children some maths. You have a merry night. ;)
Click to expand...
Don't shoot too many, or you might have to take up work as a Republican President or something, though I suppose maths teaching might be a bit elitist for those who can count only to ten!
 
Peridot said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Really? Care to provide proof that one could buy an AR-15 (style) weapon under the AWB? because that would mean the manufacturer tried subterfuge to skirt the law. Did you look into legal wrangling that happened over such? Bet you didn't.
Click to expand...


How is following the law skirting the law? Just Google "post ban AR" and you'll find thousands. So long as it didn't have too many certain features, it was legal and not covered by the ban.
Click to expand...

I asked for proof in relation to your previous statement, because the list of weapons under the AWB was quite clear. YOU made a statement, the burden of proof is on YOU. That's how it works in a debate, toodles...just ask any high school kid on the debate team. If you can't provide proof or don't really know WTF you're babbling about, then don't waste my time with these lame dodges, because I'm not doing your homework for you.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Okay, listen up NRA flunkies and republican/conservative wonks. To prevent shootings like what recently happened in Florida, you do the following:

1. Reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban. Had this been in place, Cruz would NOT have had an AR-15 in his possession.

2. Treat ALL weapons like an automobile. This means that they have to be licensed and registered, and the owner has to pass a written and physical competency test. This will severely cut down on the trafficking of illegal gun sales and greatly assist in the tracking of guns used in a crime.

Got that?
Click to expand...

Great suggestions, or we could have a giant firing squad and murder all republicans.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You refer to the bunch of willfully ignorant, paranoid and bigoted clowns who refuse to acknowledge or don't realize that an AWB does NOT "grab their guns" or magically lessen the effectiveness of the plethora of handguns, rifles and shotguns currently available. Although many members of Congress are bought and paid for by the NRA, the majority of it's members are FOR gun control amendments that the NRA leadership lobby against! Don't take my word for it, do some honest research on it.
Click to expand...
I could care less for that bunch of NRA butter nutters, i'm talking about the unseen thousands of people who have them and are constitutionally bound to be defiant to the end. WHAT DO YOU DO??????
Click to expand...

If you remember correctly, the AWB specifically stated that all those who purchased said weapons PRIOR to the enactment of the law were legally and lawfully allowed to keep them and sell them as they saw fit. A re-enactment of the law would carry the same provisions, so I don't know what the hell you're going on about. The whole point of the OP is to make it easier for law enforcement and harder for criminals and nut jobs regarding these type of weapons. What is your beef with that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top