If you want an eloquent leader, any old actor will suffice. Leadership, however, involves much more than just being able to give eloquent speeches.
I agree. Unfortunately Toadstool can't do that, either.
If you want an eloquent leader, any old actor will suffice. Leadership, however, involves much more than just being able to give eloquent speeches.
Your "natural product of aging" is a pretzel twist to attempt to excuse the fact that Trump is observably not nearly as mentally sharp as he was even just 10 years ago. I am just a few years younger than he is, and could give a far better interview/speech/talk without notes than he is capable of doing. In fact, I do so in class nearly every week, as a student. BTW, I am also a retired dementia care nurse. His speech patterns and even his gait are very similar to what we observe in this population.
I agree. Unfortunately Toadstool can't do that, either.
In this link are side-by-side videos showing him today and 30 years ago. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/02/06/opinion/trump-speech-mental-capacity.html
As a dementia nurse, you robably know that it is unethical to diagnose someone without clinical testing.
Who said 'tons of energy"?
Reread the thread.
A half-century of leadership experience says otherwise.

Of course. And no one is doing that here, are we? We are merely discussing observable characteristics of a very public figure, including a measurable difference in speaking abilities, obesity, and admitted lack of exercise while consuming an admitted unhealthy diet.
leadership?
He really fooled the flyover country rubes, for decades people in NYC has known don as a conman who had ties to the mob and who went bankrupt many times
leadership?
![]()
Of course. And no one is doing that here, are we? We are merely discussing observable characteristics of a very public figure, including a measurable difference in speaking abilities, obesity, and admitted lack of exercise while consuming an admitted unhealthy diet.
Yes. It’s called the Goldwater Rule.
“The Goldwater rule is the informal name given to section 7 in the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Principles of Medical Ethics,[1] which states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures whom they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule
Heff must have forgotten all the cyber-diagnoses of Hillary without clinical testing.
No, I didn’t mean to deflect. I just assumed a former professional might still hold some ethical standards.What is your point? Are you trying to equate a group of anonymous posters on an obscure message board, discussing observable problems with the POTUS, with one of us being a licensed physician diagnosing that same individual with a specific condition?
This is distraction. You cannot rebut the fact that Trump's mental acuity is in decline, so you've gone off on a tangent.
Heff must have forgotten all the cyber-diagnoses of Hillary without clinical testing.
Our great president, President Trump, was just given a clean bill of health. Six (6) more years!
Cypiss posts this many times and the Docs always give him a clean bill of health.
Stupid liar.
Our great president, President Trump, was just given a clean bill of health. Six (6) more years!
If trump start falling fainting at public events, you might have a point, but you don’t.
No, I didn’t mean to deflect. I just assumed a former professional might still hold some ethical standards.
But still, without a clinical evaluation all you have is speculation. I have no problem with speculation, but often it leads to conspiracy theories.
One faint, while she was battling pneumonia.