Into the Night
Verified User
Argument by repetition fallacy.Spain right now;
...deleted spam...
Argument by repetition fallacy.Spain right now;
...deleted spam...
I answer point by point because people are making multiple points.
Void argument fallacy. Which events are you referring to?
Inversion fallacy.
Theories of science are not BS. Neither is mathematics.
All of the quotes I make are in context.
Science and mathematics is not anyone's flunkie myopia.
Good. That makes them aware of these theories that are being ignored by the Church of Global Warming.
Science isn't folly. Neither is mathematics. Denying them like you do certainly is though.
False authority fallacy. NASA is a government agency. They are not a theory of science.
Science isn't babbling. Neither is mathematics.
YALIF.
I like Jules Verne. When did I guff him?
None of it became science or any device we use today.
The trip to the Moon? We used a rocket, not a cannon.
20,000 leagues under the sea? The ocean isn't that deep, dumbass.
Journey to the center of the Earth? Know a way down there without melting yourself, dumbass?
Around the World in 80 days? He used existing technology.
Don't panic. There is no natural disaster as you describe.
Define 'climate change'. It is not possible to 'manage' climate. Terraforming is another piece of science fiction.
False authority fallacy. You can't use a news source as science.
YALIF.
this simpleton just stated that NASA is NOT a "theory of science"! My God, if he's serious then he has grown up in this country without a clue as to NASA's history, and damn well didn't even read the info in the link (would have been interesting watching him deny satellite images).Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You're not a very good right wing troll, are ya bunky? I mean, no one can be this stupid or stubborn or …. wait, there's that orange faced guy in the White House. But just to watch your silly ass deny reality again:
https://climate.nasa.gov/
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issue...limate-change/
https://www.ipcc.ch/
https://skepticalscience.com/global-...termediate.htm
False authority fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global sea level, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the emissivity of Earth, or the total snow and ice content on Earth.
Science does not use consensus or supporting evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It only uses conflicting evidence.
So what is your favorite argument for the so-called 'greenhouse effect'? Do you like the Magick Blanket argument or the Magick Bouncing Photon argument?
It isn't. NASA is a government agency. YOU are trying to make NASA out to be 'science'.this simpleton just stated that NASA is NOT a "theory of science"!
I know NASA and I know what they did. Today, NASA is NOT what is was then. It has been retasked with pushing the Church of Global Warming and now denies science and mathematics. NASA is no longer about space flight or aeronautics.My God, if he's serious then he has grown up in this country without a clue as to NASA's history,
Satellites are incapable of measuring an absolute temperature. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. We don't have enough thermometers.and damn well didn't even read the info in the link (would have been interesting watching him deny satellite images).
YALIF.Faced with this type of willful ignorant troll,
Argument of the stick. Have fun isolating yourself into the kiddie pool.it's time to put him in the IA bin with the other clowns and clear up the threads.
OMG! A true trump chump troll, parroting the moronic mantra "fake news". Yeah, he's an idiot folks. I'm done with him.