Anybody think we are 'over breeding' the Planet?

J

Jack

Verified User
"Many scientists think Earth has a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people."
https://www.livescience.com/16493-people-planet-earth-support.html

And, as a secondary question, if YOU believe 'Human Activity' is causing degradation of the Land, Water, and Atmosphere, ... why would YOU support MORE PEOPLE?

*This thread is NOT intended for the Jesus Freaks that think we will all end up in Heaven playing Horse Shoes with Jesus for Eternity.
 
The US can't control 'population growth' in other Countries. But it CAN control 'population growth' in the US.
 
MASON said:
Like with Marijuana,the majority of breeding males,must be up rooted and destroyed
Click to expand...

It was more a serious question. Like, 'Extinction'.

You have Red Team that is against 'Birth Control/Abortion'.
And you have Blue Team that supports 'Immigration for All'.

Trying to be unbiased and objective here, ... it doesn't look good for the 'Survival of the Humanoids as a Species'.
 
Jack said:
It was more a serious question. Like, 'Extinction'.

You have Red Team that is against 'Birth Control/Abortion'.
And you have Blue Team that supports 'Immigration for All'.

Trying to be unbiased and objective here, ... it doesn't look good for the 'Survival of the Humanoids as a Species'.
Click to expand...

Don't worry,after the Apocalypse,
.01% will survive
 
MASON said:
Don't worry,after the Apocalypse,
.01% will survive
Click to expand...

Yeah. I'm guessing the Jesus Freaks really don't care. I was trying to get some input from those that live in Reality.

"Many of the water systems that keep ecosystems thriving and feed a growing human population have become stressed. Rivers, lakes and aquifers are drying up or becoming too polluted to use. More than half the world’s wetlands have disappeared. Agriculture consumes more water than any other source and wastes much of that through inefficiencies. Climate change is altering patterns of weather and water around the world, causing shortages and droughts in some areas and floods in others."
https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/water-scarcity
 
Jack said:
Yeah. I'm guessing the Jesus Freaks really don't care. I was trying to get some input from those that live in Reality.

"Many of the water systems that keep ecosystems thriving and feed a growing human population have become stressed. Rivers, lakes and aquifers are drying up or becoming too polluted to use. More than half the world’s wetlands have disappeared. Agriculture consumes more water than any other source and wastes much of that through inefficiencies. Climate change is altering patterns of weather and water around the world, causing shortages and droughts in some areas and floods in others."
https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/water-scarcity
Click to expand...

I thought I gave you great news!
The only way to save the planet and the plants and animals.
Is a huge reduction in the offender!Modern man!
A 99.09 % reduction should do the trick.
There's really isn't any other viable solution!:)
 
Jack said:
"Many scientists think Earth has a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people."
https://www.livescience.com/16493-people-planet-earth-support.html

And, as a secondary question, if YOU believe 'Human Activity' is causing degradation of the Land, Water, and Atmosphere, ... why would YOU support MORE PEOPLE?

*This thread is NOT intended for the Jesus Freaks that think we will all end up in Heaven playing Horse Shoes with Jesus for Eternity.
Click to expand...

How do you breed a planet?
 
Jack said:
"Many scientists think Earth has a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people."
https://www.livescience.com/16493-people-planet-earth-support.html

And, as a secondary question, if YOU believe 'Human Activity' is causing degradation of the Land, Water, and Atmosphere, ... why would YOU support MORE PEOPLE?

*This thread is NOT intended for the Jesus Freaks that think we will all end up in Heaven playing Horse Shoes with Jesus for Eternity.
Click to expand...

That must be the same idiot scientists that believe the climate change hoax. They can't be trusted.

If more people are a problem, there is an easy solution. All of the idiots that believe the climate change hoax can immediately, and voluntarily, stop breathing. If they truly cared about the planet and truly believed what they claim to believe, why wouldn't they do their part about all the CO2 they emit when they exhale?
 
Jack said:
Yeah. I'm guessing the Jesus Freaks really don't care. I was trying to get some input from those that live in Reality.

"Many of the water systems that keep ecosystems thriving and feed a growing human population have become stressed. Rivers, lakes and aquifers are drying up or becoming too polluted to use. More than half the world’s wetlands have disappeared. Agriculture consumes more water than any other source and wastes much of that through inefficiencies. Climate change is altering patterns of weather and water around the world, causing shortages and droughts in some areas and floods in others."
https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/water-scarcity
Click to expand...


You better hope Hell can hold that many. It's going to be uncomfortable for you.
 
Jack said:
"Many scientists think Earth has a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people."
https://www.livescience.com/16493-people-planet-earth-support.html

And, as a secondary question, if YOU believe 'Human Activity' is causing degradation of the Land, Water, and Atmosphere, ... why would YOU support MORE PEOPLE?

*This thread is NOT intended for the Jesus Freaks that think we will all end up in Heaven playing Horse Shoes with Jesus for Eternity.
Click to expand...

Those numbers are extremely conservative and probably far off the mark. In North America alone only around 25% of our arable land is even populated. Approximately half the population of North America live in the Continental US east of the Mississippi River and even there the population density is about half that of Europe.

The planets human carrying capacity of the planet far exceeds the numbers the article quotes by 3 to 4 times those numbers. Look at Asia for another example. Of the 4.5 billion people in Asia 3 billion live in China and India with most of their populations concentrated along their coasts. Both nations together represent about 20% of the land area of Asia. Massive areas of northern and Central Asia are still sparsely populated but have the carrying capacity for much larger human populations. They may have unpleasant climates but certainly ones in which large numbers of humans can survive and thrive in.

As for the ecological effects of course those areas seeing large population growth are profoundly impacted. As to why more, that’s a question with no real answer. Because we can? Ultimately humanity is governed by the laws of biology and if human populations exceed the capacity to support life then large numbers of the excessive populations will die until a balance with carrying capacity is reached.
 
MASON said:
I thought I gave you great news!
The only way to save the planet and the plants and animals.
Is a huge reduction in the offender!Modern man!
A 99.09 % reduction should do the trick.
There's really isn't any other viable solution!:)
Click to expand...

How about you climate change hoax believers immediately, and voluntarily, stop breathing and emitting the CO2 you claim is causing the problem?
 
CFM said:
That must be the same idiot scientists that believe the climate change hoax. They can't be trusted.

If more people are a problem, there is an easy solution. All of the idiots that believe the climate change hoax can immediately, and voluntarily, stop breathing. If they truly cared about the planet and truly believed what they claim to believe, why wouldn't they do their part about all the CO2 they emit when they exhale?
Click to expand...

I believe you are a Jesus Freak, so you could care less what happens.
 
Mott: "Those numbers are extremely conservative and probably far off the mark."
Jack: The Scientists came up with the number. They must have had a reason for the calculation.

Mott: "The planets human carrying capacity of the planet far exceeds the numbers the article quotes by 3 to 4 times those numbers."
Jack: Wow! Are you sure it's not 10 or 20 times the number the Article quotes? (I'm taking their word on this over yours)

Mott: "As for the ecological effects of course those areas seeing large population growth are profoundly impacted."
Jack: Yes. Scarcity of Fresh Water would be one thing.

Mott: "As to why more, that’s a question with no real answer."
Jack: The Answer would be LESS Humans. NOT MORE. Is there ANY benefit for MORE Humans on the Planet?

Mott: "Ultimately humanity is governed by the laws of biology and if human populations exceed the capacity to support life then large numbers of the excessive populations will die."
Jack: Yes. Or Humans have the capacity to see what could happen and Plan for the Future.

Mott: "... until a balance with carrying capacity is reached."
Jack: OR ... the Humans degrade the Planet, the Water, and the Atmosphere, to the point no Humans can exist on Earth, the Home Planet.


It's funny (not funny haha, but funny odd) that the same people that claim 'Climate Change' is caused by 'Human Activity', don't support a Program of Population Control.



Mott the Hoople said:
Those numbers are extremely conservative and probably far off the mark. In North America alone only around 25% of our arable land is even populated. Approximately half the population of North America live in the Continental US east of the Mississippi River and even there the population density is about half that of Europe.

The planets human carrying capacity of the planet far exceeds the numbers the article quotes by 3 to 4 times those numbers. Look at Asia for another example. Of the 4.5 billion people in Asia 3 billion live in China and India with most of their populations concentrated along their coasts. Both nations together represent about 20% of the land area of Asia. Massive areas of northern and Central Asia are still sparsely populated but have the carrying capacity for much larger human populations. They may have unpleasant climates but certainly ones in which large numbers of humans can survive and thrive in.

As for the ecological effects of course those areas seeing large population growth are profoundly impacted. As to why more, that’s a question with no real answer. Because we can? Ultimately humanity is governed by the laws of biology and if human populations exceed the capacity to support life then large numbers of the excessive populations will die until a balance with carrying capacity is reached.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top