Powell strikes back!

The reality is the same tears in the constitution are appearing right now, I complained then, I complain now. The only difference.... liberals stopped complaining.

Instead of magically ending wiretapping with no warrants, we actually get it harder and faster with an argument added that you cannot sue them. Liberals, some barely mention it in some threads on this message board but otherwise ignore it, the rest... silence.

Tribunals... momentarily suspended, then started right back up again. Silence.

Iraq... Bush's time line... silence...

In all the things that supposedly mattered the most before the election, the things I heard the most about and often agreed with y'all about... all we get from you is silence and apology.

For the past 8 years I have spoken against the expansion of government by what normally would be my own party, but they bowed down to liberalism, heard the powerful sirens call of fascism. Bush was no conservative.

I suggest you follow the ACLU cases being filed against the Obama administrations recent actions...then listen to the progressive programs of Pacifica Broadcasting. There are a LOT of people not happy with Obama's decisions, and are quite vocal about it. Hell, I even started a thread questioning whether Obama was the new Slick Willy. Not many folk touched that...I would have thought every neocon on this board would have chimed in....go figure.

That the MSM doesn't cover this is no big surprise...given their less than stellar performance during the Shrub's reign.

As for the Shrub not being a conservative...you're right. He was a NEW Conservative...or a neocon for short. As I said, the PNAC agenda has NOTHING to do with liberalism, and that is what the Shrub followed to the letter. So Southern Man's claim is just illogical, if not irrational.
 
So after a week or so of spin culminating into almost admitting that I am right, you went right back into full emotional rant mode and refuse to acknowledge my rock solid assertion. Let me try another tack then.

You're a liar. I detest liars and will not let them get away with it.....here's a quote where I answered you and you didn't have the brains or the guts to honestly respond:

. Southern Man: Modern Liberalism seeks to tear down the Constitution, create a government that controls nearly all aspects of our lives:
Taichiliberal: Again, Prove it! Let's see how you do.
Southern Man: "Fairness Doctrine",
Taichiliberal: which required broadcast stations to devote AT LEAST ONE PORTION of their broadcast schedule to reflect an alternative political/social view point, in order to avoid a monopoly type situation. As TV came into view, station owners whined that it was "too difficult" to arrange their schedules to do such, and lobbied to remove the Doctrine and got Ronnie Raygun to do it. Now you have Fox News, Clear Channel, Air America...and other politically/socially lopsided stations/networks. Gee, whatever happened to anti-trust laws?
Southern Man: State run media;
Taichiliberal: You mean collusion with the state media? Like GE (military contracts) owning broadcast stations?
Southern Man: Gun registration, restrictions and out-right bans;
Taichiliberal: Puh-leeze, spare us all this constant regurgitation of NRA propaganda that preys on paranoid souls like you. Bottom line: If you are a law abiding citizen, you can buy a gun for home protection, you want to carry, you can fill out a form, pay a fee, take the course.....and to date the only "ban" you gun dupes are whining about is that you can't get your hands on every possible weapon known to man. As it stands, you get a plethora hand guns, hunting rifles, semi-automatic weapons. If you feel you can't defend yourself with that, then join the police force or the military. (Washington, DC was the only true "ban", that lasted 30 years before being voted down).
Southern Man: Total usurpation of the People and State's rights by creation of a federal government that completely ignores its limited mandate of enumerated powers.
Taichiliberal: Yeah, you don't like the Federal gov't....no surprise. Funny how folk like you had no problem (and were happy as clams in beer)with the Federal gov't under Nixon, or Reagan or the Bush family. Can you say Hypocrit, boys & girls? Sure you can, I knew you could.


Can explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.

It's called Congress, moron....the Senate and the House of Representatives: They approved the formenetioned, passed it into law. Any contentions went before the SCOTUS...and were approved within the context of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's how it works, genius. You don't like it, write your congressman or senator. And if you're really pissed, just write a check to the IRS to give back those two welfare, err stimulus checks from the Shrub you cashed.
Now, go repeat your bullshit.
 
Last edited:
It's called Congress, moron....the Senate and the House of Representatives: They approved the formenetioned, passed it into law. Any contentions went before the SCOTUS...and were approved within the context of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's how it works, genius. You don't like it, right your congressman or senator. And if you're really pissed, just write a check to the IRS to give back those two welfare, err stimulus checks from the Shrub you cashed.
Now, go repeat your bullshit.
Congress has acted unconstitutionally before, so has the SCOTUS. Remember Scott v. Sandford?

I made too much money to qualify for the "stimulus" check; can I have some of yours?

But you ignored the question: can explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
It's called Congress, moron....the Senate and the House of Representatives: They approved the formenetioned, passed it into law. Any contentions went before the SCOTUS...and were approved within the context of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's how it works, genius. You don't like it, right your congressman or senator. And if you're really pissed, just write a check to the IRS to give back those two welfare, err stimulus checks from the Shrub you cashed.
Now, go repeat your bullshit.


Congress has acted unconstitutionally before, so has the SCOTUS. Remember Scott v. Sandford? Yes, and that was over ruled (albeit indirectly) by 16 years later by the Court in the Slaughter House Cases...which pointed out that the passing of the 14th Amendment 6 years earlier automatically overruled the decision. Surely you are NOT trying to compare your little list of ultra conservative gripes with the Dredd Scott decision?

I made too much money to qualify for the "stimulus" check; can I have some of yours? You are SO full of shit, it's tragic...you claim to earn $75K or $150 with the wife, yet you waste an enormous amount of time getting everything ass backwards on these boards with your neocon based diatribes. Pardon me if I don't put my cognitive reasoning skills on hold to swallow that.

But you ignored the question: can explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action. Haven't you learned that this childish ploy of yours doesn't work anymore....everytime I give you an answer that you don't like and cannot disprove, you just try some dodge then repeat yourself. Or maybe I'm just taking for granted that you share the same generic knowledge of history as I and the rest of America does.I am not without compassion....here, FYI http://www.answers.com/topic/welfare-system
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
It's called Congress, moron....the Senate and the House of Representatives: They approved the formenetioned, passed it into law. Any contentions went before the SCOTUS...and were approved within the context of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's how it works, genius. You don't like it, right your congressman or senator. And if you're really pissed, just write a check to the IRS to give back those two welfare, err stimulus checks from the Shrub you cashed.
Now, go repeat your bullshit.
You ignored the question again: can explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.
 
Wait until you find out that "done with you" means he'll continue ranting, for several more posts.

He's just a wall flower hoping to impress anyone, by trying to appear intelligent.

As usual, he fails and fails miserably

Well fortunately nobody here takes you to be intelligent and with every post you just confirm their initial observations.
 
You ignored the question again: can explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.

I answered you...even gave a link at one point, as the recorded posts show. Your problem is that you just can't admit to being wrong...or you're too stupid to comprehend the information and logic presented to you.

Unfortunately, you seem to think covering your eyes and repeating yourself is validation of your assertions. Sorry to inform you, but as I learned in grade school that is pure folly on your part. The only other person you'll impress are like minded fools like USfreedom (someone should inform that poor dullard that America's freedom was Never in danger on 9/11). Oh well, congratulate yourself or have a maudlin exchange with the other neocon parrots. I'll just enjoy the show.
:corn:
 
Well fortunately nobody here takes you to be intelligent and with every post you just confirm their initial observations.

He's a pathetic soul, isn't he? He spent several days throwing stones at me through other posters before actually addressing me directly when I first got on this site. Oh well, there are enough neocon numbskulls of his caliber here to keep him company.....so much more to pity.

Other than that, how's it going Tom?
 
I answered you...even gave a link at one point ...
What irony, a link in your own words.

Again, please explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.
 
Isn't the poster the sweetest little fella?

You are right, none of which you speak are Constitutional. Our government has been getting away with this crap for years.

What irony, a link in your own words.

Again, please explain to me, in your own words, how any one of these programs is Constitutional on the federal level: welfare, government housing, government run schools, or Affirmative Action.
 
Isn't the poster the sweetest little fella?

You are right, none of which you speak are Constitutional. Our government has been getting away with this crap for years.
Maybe if TaiChiLiberal would open his closed mind a tiny little crack we can pour some knowledge in there. :)
 
No, you need to give me odds; because you were the one that said it was a possibllity and I think you're incorrect.

I'll settle for 3 to 1 odds.
How does that sound?
Yeah but I was being all hope and changey back there; not my usual wise, cynical self. :clink:
 
Poor Blabba....still hiding behind others and throwing rocks...yet not possessing the brains nor courage to honestly debate an issue.

You've got a new start here, sweet pea. Use it.

DAMN sissie!!

You got so flustered that you forgot to color your post.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
 
Back
Top