The Supreme Court faces an existential crisis of legitimacy

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/

I suspect you wouldn't have your panties in a bunch if 6 of the SC members were all alt-lefties. Now that we have all seen the true side of Garland, I will be sending a cash donation for McConnel's re-election.
 
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/

The Republican Party has been screaming "activist judges" for years and now they've proved they are the ones doing it.

The Republican Party has stuffed SCOTUS with activist judges to politicize the Supreme Court. Sad. I used to respect the US Supreme Court, now I know it's filled with liars.

Brett Cavanaugh? LIED during his nomination process.

Amy Coney Barrett? LIED during her nomination process.

Clarence Thomas? LIED during his nomination process.

How can a nation respect lying justices or a kangaroo court that simply follows party politics?
 
I suspect you wouldn't have your panties in a bunch if 6 of the SC members were all alt-lefties. Now that we have all seen the true side of Garland, I will be sending a cash donation for McConnel's re-election.

I posted basically the same thing.

Soto would not be worried that “the Constitution and its reading are just political acts” if the Court was 5-4 or 6-3 liberal.

She never supports the Constitution...ever.
 
I posted basically the same thing.

Soto would not be worried that “the Constitution and its reading are just political acts” if the Court was 5-4 or 6-3 liberal.

She never supports the Constitution...ever.

But she is a "WISE LATINA" ... just ask her
 
But she is a "WISE LATINA" ... just ask her

Indeed... my esposa is a wise Latina...she married me.

Soto is a partisan, totally biased Justice who never defends from deviations to the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said it better than any of the court’s external critics. "Will this institution survive the stench this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” she asked during oral arguments on Mississippi’s abortion law on Wednesday. “If people believe this is all politics, how will we survive? How will this court survive?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...court-faces-an-existential-crisis-legitimacy/

Then justice Sotomayor believes public opinion should be the deciding factor in making the court's ruling. Hell we don't need a court then. Let's just enact laws through mob rule!
 
yes, their OWN bodies, not the body of an unborn human being inside their body. But lets pursue your "logic" a little further. and I'm going to ignore your juvenile attempt to insult me.

Using your logic, why shouldn't a mother be able to kill a 2 year old when he or she becomes a financial problem or interferes with her social life? If inconvenience is the criteria for murder, why does it only apply pre birth?

Because the rights of the mother do not supersede the rights of the child after it's born.

One sentence.

It's that simple, you pile of shit.
 
the idiots in Roe used the first amendment (speech) as the criteria for making it legal.

You really are a fucking idiot. Roe's decision is grounded in the 14th Amendment. Read it, you country fucking hick.
 
In God’s eyes, the rights of the mother do not exceed the rights of the child before and after the child is born.

In about six months, the S.C. will say pretty much the same thing.
 
There are two bodies involved...two hearts, two brains...the mother has the right to do what she wants with her own body but not the unborn baby who has rights too.

This will all be settled in a few months and I believe the right for a mother to murder her own child will be restricted...greatly.

The government cannot force a woman to fulfill a pregnancy. An aborted child never knows it was aborted.

I fear you might be correct, though, that the Neanderthals on the Supreme Court will strengthen their position that women are subhuman and not worthy of human rights. That's really what you mean/want.
 
I suspect you wouldn't have your panties in a bunch if 6 of the SC members were all alt-lefties. Now that we have all seen the true side of Garland, I will be sending a cash donation for McConnel's re-election.

That doesn't surprise anyone. Make sure to steal from your great grandchildrens' piggy banks to pay for Trump's legal bills too. :laugh:
 
Indeed... my esposa is a wise Latina...she married me.

Soto is a partisan, totally biased Justice who never defends from deviations to the Constitution.

Sounds like a dumb, desperate bitch who needed a green card. She definitely cheats on you.
 
In God’s eyes, the rights of the mother do not exceed the rights of the child before and after the child is born.

In about six months, the S.C. will say pretty much the same thing.

There is no gawd, cracker. You should have been aborted.
 
The good protectors of the Constitution will rightly rule that the unborn children have rights too.

The “settled law” issue was dealt with by the listing of settled law cases that have been overturned.

There will be no diminishment of women’s rights after the ruling, just their never existent right to murder their own child.

Unwanted children can and are adopted...contraception is available to rich and poor.
 
The raised in a barn pendejo can take a hike.

His scatological posts scream “look at me...look at me, please.”

Perhaps a neglected child seeking attention, anyway he can get it.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't surprise anyone. Make sure to steal from your great grandchildrens' piggy banks to pay for Trump's legal bills too. :laugh:

Dear Mr. Mom jeans,
country-jpg.872720
 
The good protectors of the Constitution will rightly rule that the unborn children have rights too.

The “settled law” issue was dealt with by the listing of settled law cases that have been overturned.

There will be no diminishment of women’s rights after the ruling, just their never existent right to murder their own child.

Unwanted children can and are adopted...contraception is available to rich and poor.

They were wrong about Dredd Scott too.

The Republican authoritarians demand that the potential child's rights supersede that of an adult American citizen. Only Authoritarian cocksuckers support such an agenda.

We know pedophiles support such as agenda as seen in Trump, Matt Gaetz and other Republican pedophiles. Maybe they should change their motto to "Save babies for fucking"?

NSFW MEME REPUBLICAN PEDOS

5wprkr.jpg
 
The good protectors of the Constitution will rightly rule that the unborn children have rights too.

The “settled law” issue was dealt with by the listing of settled law cases that have been overturned.

There will be no diminishment of women’s rights after the ruling, just their never existent right to murder their own child.

Unwanted children can and are adopted...contraception is available to rich and poor.

You hate women. We get it. Shut the fuck up already.
 
The raised in a barn pendejo can take a hike.

His scatological posts scream “look at me...look at me, please.”

Perhaps a neglected child seeking attention, anyway he can get it.

And the raised in a gutter bruto can do us all a favor by slitting his own throat.

His scatalogical posts scream, "I'm an old, white male and am therefore not to be questioned!"

Perhaps a 100-year-old racist seeking to justify his wife beating and racism.
 
Back
Top