tigerred59
Verified User
If Trump is given a free pass and walk without any blame for the hell he's raged on this nation......than STOP TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY TO OUR KIDS!!
Deal to drop all charges against trump
- Thread starter Yakuda
- Start date
Who decided that?
Only one justice was on the court when Bush V. Gore was heard, Thomas never said it was a mistake.
You post plenty of over the top Trump hate.
You are extremely partisan. The democrats, though left of Stalin, may still be too conservative for you.
ROFL
Keep dreaming.
LOL - you live in a fantasy world.
Joe Biden has ended democracy by having his thug, Jack Smith end the 1st Amendment. Open assault on the Constitution is right in the lap of the SCOTUS. Smith will again be crushed by the Supreme Court.
Joe Biden is prosecuting Donald Trump to tamper with the 2024 election - it's something despots and tin horn dictators like Biden do.
Biden brought in a hit man, Jack Smith to take out Trump. Mobster Jack has charged Trump with illegal speech - claiming that saying the 2020 election is stolen is illegal - unlike when Biden said 2016 was stolen.
Mobster Jack has criminalized speech. You cheer him on because you only care about power for your Reich.
Yet the Biden Cartel isn't charging Trump with "shady behavior." The Reich has criminalized speech and is charging him with "conspiracy" based on stating that the 2020 election was stolen. Mobster Jack claims that saying the 2020 election is stolen is a "lie" and that Trump knows it's a lie - somehow when Trump says it, it's completely different than Stacy Abrams saying the 2018 was stolen, because Sieg Heil.
Smith, on behalf of the Big Guy, isn't just violating the 1st Amendment - he's ending it. Ending the bill of rights is a major agenda item for the democrat party.
Tinkerpeach
Member
Plenty of people who've suffered under him would disagree with you.
Many lawyers and judges would disagree with you.
He was a very bad pick to go after Trump because judges are aware of his reputation.
So then, your Reich is a thousand year Reich and can never be defeated?
500 million guns, and they aren't in the hands of your fellow wokesters. I know, Quid Pro wants to use nukes against American citizens - but your wet dream of the military backing your treason is just a fantasy.
Reich has its privilege.
We can't expect Reich members to be held to laws.
Laws are there to beat the outsiders into submission.
Of course you did. The idea that Hillary would be held to the same laws as Donald Trump is laughable.
Reich has its privilege.
Hunter agreed to plead guilty to income tax and gun charges.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question. If Trump takes the primary, which is very likely - and then somehow overcomes all of the tricks democrats have put in place to rig the election and somehow wins the EC - do you think the democrats would allow him to take office?
Biden recently stated that he "would in no way allow Donald Trump to become president again." He is already using the weaponized DOI and FBI to carry out political attacks. Using the military isn't too far of a stretch.
The Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory propagated by the democrat party had a lot to do with the protest against the Reich on 1/6/21 - the Reichstag Fire.
4 years of treason by democrats tends to cause bad feelings among Americans.
What action is that, Herr Himmler?
BartenderElite
Verified User
Many centrists and independents can't stand Trump, and what he has done to America.
That's not a good supporting point for your incorrect contention that I'm a Dem, or "extremely partisan." I'm not either.
They were mad Trump lost and believed the election fraud lies and were seeking to block the electoral vote count. "Bad feelings" is not justification for violence, assault, and seditious conspiracy.
Tinkerpeach
Member
For a slap on the wrist.
Who wouldn't take that deal.
Thankfully the judge threw it out.
Right, you just want to make it clear that ANYONE who goes against the ruling Oligarchy will be utterly destroyed.
That's what this is really all about. Trump stood up to the globalist rulers. The attacks on Trump have to be HARSH to send a message to anyone else - no matter how rich or popular you are - going against the rulers of the nation and the planet will bring a never ending war against you - exactly what we have seen your Reich do to Trump.
But this also shows that those you serve are vulnerable - they fear exposure.
I'm not kidding when I say he is a mob lawyer. That's exactly what he is and why Biden appointed him.
Facts?
ROFL
The indictment reads like a Rachel Maddow monologue. Pure partisan hackery with no basis in fact or law.
Now you have no knowledge of the law, and no care about the law,
But for fun, let Matt Taibbe of Rolling Stone school you
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the opening passages of the indictment Smith rails against Trump’s “knowingly false statements,” saying they created an “intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger,” intended to “erode public faith in the administration of the election.” I thought I was having an acid flashback when I read this passage. Instead of focusing on overt acts in the individual states, episodes which clearly make even some Trump supporters nervous, the prosecutors are after bigger game. They want to argue that by spreading “lies” Trump created an “atmosphere of mistrust and anger” that, by the end, they will argue led to the “violent” “attack” on the Capitol. This argument brings in fairly anodyne Trump tweets, like “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!”, or “Our country has had enough, they won’t take it anymore!”, and ties it to the crowd’s “Send it Back!” chants, its “steady, violent advancement” toward Capitol doors, and scenes of crowd members “violently attacking law enforcement.”
The Supreme Court in 1969 heard a landmark case, Brandenburg v. Ohio, that set an extremely high bar for government intervention in speech cases, making the standard “likely to incite or produce… imminent lawless action.” A tweeting campaign that begins in November and produces a general “atmosphere of mistrust and anger” that by January works a protesting crowd into a lather is exactly the kind of behavior Brandenburg says is not illegal.