Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
I found nothing.
Ah, there is nothing on Google, because they manipulate things.
On Yahoo it's the 2nd page.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=letit...AAEA41C180C3C90CB6BA9DFA&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl=
I found nothing.
A legitimate source is on page twoAh, there is nothing on Google, because they manipulate things.
On Yahoo it's the 2nd page.
So you think you're clairvoyant, aye?
What am I thinking right now?...
That you wish you were not a simpleton moron, so you could make better arguments.
What do i win?
And no clairvoyance is needed to read your idiocy.
Indeed.
you never need to post anything more than that to reveal your thoughts.
You are Boebert level dumb.
Trump is going bonkers. No doubt he's breaking every dish within reach.He owned the corporation that owns it, The corporation is in receivership of the state of New York, pending appeal.
Trump is going bonkers. No doubt he's breaking every dish within reach.
![]()
Nikki. She's matching Ronnie in the polls.Who is birdbrain?
What did the judge decide as a matter of fact? Tell us?
based on the judge's finding that the property is only worth $18M.......ibviously not meeting the reasonableness test used on appeal of a finding of fact.......sucks to be as stupid as you and the judge.....No the ISSUE is the judge found he has committed p consistent and continual fraud.
obviously no......I don't expect the appeals court to find any statement of Trump to be fraudulent.....because Trump's statement of the value on the loan application is obviously more reasonable than the one the trial judge decided to be "fact".......yet you think a superior court will say 'sure all of those FACTS you have shown us in the Trump various filings are indeed fraudulent
that the value of MarLago was only $18M.......but then, you knew that unless you're a mindless fuckwitted......
based on the judge's finding that the property is only worth $18M.......ibviously not meeting the reasonableness test used on appeal of a finding of fact.......sucks to be as stupid as you and the judge.....
Judge did not find that the property was only worth 18 Million, you are a liar like all insecure Trumppers.
based on the judge's finding that the property is only worth $18M.......ibviously not meeting the reasonableness test used on appeal of a finding of fact.......sucks to be as stupid as you and the judge.....
obviously no......I don't expect the appeals court to find any statement of Trump to be fraudulent.....because Trump's statement of the value on the loan application is obviously more reasonable than the one the trial judge decided to be "fact".......
The judge using Trumps submission of the valuation when Trump argued it was worth LESS than $18MM you simple minded moron.
![]()
![]()
YOu know the rule when it comes to any topic in the legal domain and that you shut up as you get EVERYTHING wrong.
The appeals court is not going not say 'you used Trumps own legal submissions on value so we are overturning this'.
what did he find then?
Was your prison bunkmate an accountant, Matt?You're such a simp. Tax assessment price which can only go up 3% a year and market value are 2 completely deferent things.
The Judge said the value of Mar-A-Lago was only 18 Million? I call bullshit. Prove it you liar. Your pussy ass cant... so run!
Was your prison bunkmate an accountant, Matt?
The judge did no estimates. He simply said what Mira Lardo was rated at by Trump's people in the past for tax purposes.