anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Even if the Ukrainian government collapses, the Russians will be facing years of resistance. Putin will never will and the Russians will eventually pull out.
Hard to say. Look at Chechnya.
Even if the Ukrainian government collapses, the Russians will be facing years of resistance. Putin will never will and the Russians will eventually pull out.
Says who? The NY Slimes?![]()
History will move them up.
He wants to sound informed and intelligent. The MAGATs hate the "failing New York Times" because 1) their fuehrer told them to, and 2) they perceive it as something liberal "elitists" subscribe to. Maybe I should change the title under my screen name from "Leftist Vermin" to "New York Times Subscriber."![]()
New presidential rankings place Obama in top 10, Reagan and Trump below Biden
A new poll of historians coming out on Presidents’ Day weekend ranks Mr. Biden as the 14th-best president in American history, just ahead of Woodrow Wilson, Ronald Reagan and Ulysses S. Grant. While that may not get Mr. Biden a spot on Mount Rushmore, it certainly puts him well ahead of Mr. Trump, who places dead last as the worst president ever.
https://[B]www.foxnews.com/us/new-presi...mp-below-biden[/B]
And ended the 20+ year war in Afghanistan. Oversaw record low unemployment and increased domestic oil production to historic levels. Decreased the cost of prescriptions and diabetic supplies; allowed Medicare to negotiate pricing.
Biden’s record and accomplishments are extremely positive
ROFL
The Voice of The Reich rating presidents is as useful as a pig rating piles of shit.
The average bum on skid row has more insight into the value of presidents than do the mindless cunts of the NY Times.
Trump will permanently be the worst President in US history.
It was a rough war there and I'm not sure it's over just because American news doesn't carry it. It's landlocked and much smaller than Ukraine.Hard to say. Look at Chechnya.
They questioned respondents on the DNC.
Among the American Marxists of the filthy democrat party.
Obiden has done more damage to the Constitutional Republic than any - or all presidents before him. Why not rate him #1? The goal of the NY Times is to end and then erase America - no one has done more to make that a reality than Obiden.
Standard Disclaimer: Obama squatted and took a steaming Biden on America....
List the source. I've seen a number of those lists over the years from various "academics" and it's pretty easy to see they put little thought into them, making them pretty much worthless other than being their opinion as they clearly didn't base their evaluations on any sort of ranking criteria.
First, explain why you claimed no source was provided in the article, when anyone who looked at the article clearly saw the source was highlighted and hyperlinked.
Why did you assert so confidently the article wouldn't provide a source?
The NYT had absolutely nothing to do with this ranking. They simply reported on it like every other media source in the country including FOX.Among the American Marxists of the filthy democrat party.
Obiden has done more damage to the Constitutional Republic than any - or all presidents before him. Why not rate him #1? The goal of the NY Times is to end and then erase America - no one has done more to make that a reality than Obiden.
Standard Disclaimer: Obama squatted and took a steaming Biden on America....
Thanks for that. I looked up the survey. It's nothing but an opinion poll.
http://www.brandonrottinghaus.com/u...1/presidential_greatness_white_paper_2024.pdf
This was the polling base:
Respondents included current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association, which is the foremost organization of social science experts in presidential politics, as well as scholars who had recently published peer-reviewed academic research in key related scholarly journals or academic presses. 525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.1
The respondents did not have to use any set of criteria, and each was free to use any method they chose. That makes it an opinion poll, not some statistical measure. That pretty much makes the whole thing rubbish.
The source may as well be Skull and Bones. You can call that a source if it pleases you.
Did you see how to become a member?
These ”presidential rankings” are like comparing athletes of different eras. Useless.
You can still rank them using criteria and even weighting things for different eras. That wasn't done in the poll being discussed here. Participants were asked to rate presidents on a scale of 0 to 100 thus:
The primary purpose of this survey was to create a ranking of presidential greatness that covered all presidents from George Washington to Joe Biden. To do this, we asked respondents to rate each president on a scale of 0-100 for their overall greatness, with 0=failure, 50=average, and 100=great. We then averaged the ratings for each president and ranked them from highest average to lowest.
There was no ranking criteria beyond the participant's own opinion. That the survey used supposed "experts" is just an irrelevant appeal to authority in this case. Just because you are some academic somewhere doesn't make your opinion--on its own--more or less valuable than anyone else's. If they had some ranking system and were justifying their responses based on factual evidence, it would have some actual value.
As it is, this is nothing but a worthless opinion survey taken by 154 people.
No matter where you look, Trump is always ranked forty first or below
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States