None needed in the Democrat party, Void."Yes they can."
No, they can't. At least not before the conversation and only if those who pledged to Biden can unpledge.
The Oligarchy behind the Super Delegates simply choose. That's it.
None needed in the Democrat party, Void."Yes they can."
No, they can't. At least not before the conversation and only if those who pledged to Biden can unpledge.
There's no argument. Had he chosen to stay in as the Dem candidate, nobody could do shit about it. He'd still be the Dem candidate today.Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, Void.
It doesn't matter if "they" chose. If they went to him in Saturday night, the night before he RESIGNED, asked him to quit and he said "no", what could they do? How would they force him out?None needed in the Democrat party, Void.
The Oligarchy behind the Super Delegates simply choose. That's it.
Hmmm....No, in fact, I'm always telling folks here that America is not a democracy, rather, that it's a Constitutional Republic.
Libhater said:You know what is a threat to democracy?
I don't know. What percentage? I'll bet you don't have an answer.and yet what percentage of people in the US say they were better off under Trump than they are under Biden.........fuck the opinion of the lib'rul rag you quoted......
https://news.gallup.com/poll/469898/half-say-worse-off-highest-2009.aspxI don't know. What percentage? I'll bet you don't have an answer.
You don't seem to understand much about time. You think the 1800s are not part of US history and you think Feb 2023 is July 2024.
and you mistakenly think you're relevant.........You don't seem to understand much about time. You think the 1800s are not part of US history and you think Feb 2023 is July 2024.
Leftists?Ignoring the election at presidential primaries and having donors decide on the presidential candidate.
You are locked in another paradox. You cannot clear it by denying it. You MUST utterly discard one of the conflicting arguments.There's no argument.
Leftist ShitLords!Ignoring the election at presidential primaries and having donors decide on the presidential candidate.

RQAAIt doesn't matter if "they" chose. If they went to him in Saturday night, the night before he RESIGNED, asked him to quit and he said "no", what could they do? How would they force him out?
2009 is not a year earlier than 2024.You don't seem to understand much about time. You think the 1800s are not part of US history and you think Feb 2023 is July 2024.
And you think Trump was President in 2022 because the poll you reference is about finances compared to a year earlier.
Nope. There is no conflict...as I explainedYou are locked in another paradox. You cannot clear it by denying it. You MUST utterly discard one of the conflicting arguments.
Of course, you never do, and you choose to remain irrational.
Your answer made no sense. They could not FORCE him out. Period. He CHOSE to quit.RQAA
You cannot clear you paradox by denying it, moron.Nope. There is no conflict...as I explained
Sorry, you are still locked in that paradox. Which is it, dude?Your answer made no sense. They could not FORCE him out. Period. He CHOSE to quit.
Deal with it.