Not if everything else is moving at 17,000 mph in the same orbit.Even a chip of paint traveling at 17,000 mph, almost 25x the speed of sound, is like a hypersonic bullet that destroys anything it hits.
As Einstein said, "It's all relative."
Not if everything else is moving at 17,000 mph in the same orbit.Even a chip of paint traveling at 17,000 mph, almost 25x the speed of sound, is like a hypersonic bullet that destroys anything it hits.
Great Post Big Dog!A busy Wawa off the beltway, posted cash only as credit card services went down. It was like the apocalypse. Well, a sign of what it would be like. People could not conduct business or purchase gas unless they had cash.
If the world's satellites were destroyed by a space nuke, so many things would cease to function.
You only have to destroy a few satellites and the debris from those will destroy other satellites. It is known as the cascade effect, and would wipe out all satellites and the debris would make it virtually impossible to use that part of the exosphere for long into the future.
How should the U.S. respond if Putin nukes LEO outerspace and wipes out all satellites?
Geostationary satellite are very distant from the Earth, so have a lot of lag. They also have limited bandwidth. If possible they are replaced with cables as much as possible. Developing countries, along with rural areas, are falling behind replacing them with cables.
Destroying satellites would hurt everyone, but would hurt India, China, Russia, etc. far worse. And of course would hurt Wyoming far more than New York City.
Nope. Wouldn't hurt Wyoming at all. They are connected by the Wasatch Relay system (a 'cable').Geostationary satellite are very distant from the Earth, so have a lot of lag. They also have limited bandwidth. If possible they are replaced with cables as much as possible. Developing countries, along with rural areas, are falling behind replacing them with cables.
Destroying satellites would hurt everyone, but would hurt India, China, Russia, etc. far worse. And of course would hurt Wyoming far more than New York City.
Basically correct.The Kessler effect (Kessler syndrome) is what you are talking about and it won't occur as quickly as you think or as depicted in the movies. When a satellite is destroyed, the debris goes into its own orbit. For the debris to hit something else it has to be orbiting at the same height and in a different direction for it to damage another satellite.
Thank you, Geeko, I thought it would be a fun topic.Great Post Big Dog!
Naturally we would retaliate by shooting down theirs.
But anyway, it would present a huge problem for the entire world- including Russia. And Russia would be shooting itself in the head- if they were to ever attempt some insane act like that.
Here is a study that may make you feel a little more rest assured that we have people working on this!
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blo...ould-require-a-firm-us-response-not-hysteria/
Yeah.Not if everything else is moving at 17,000 mph in the same orbit.
As Einstein said, "It's all relative."
You are speculating without providing any evidence. This is typical white lib behavior. In general, the less advanced a country is, the less its people will be affected.
You are a Trump fan Big Dog, and one thing that comes to mind when people ask what Donald Trump's Legacy will be, but for sure, was Trump's announcement that we were naming our Space Program the SPACE FORCE and naming it as another branch of our armed services.
I think everyone liked that idea, whether that was a Donnie idea or not.
I don't know the back story on that, but I credit him with doing it!
The Doomsday Clock is at a record 90 seconds thanks to Kamala and Plugs.Your OP topic was idle speculation about something that has a snowball's chance in hell of ever happening.
You know nothing about military tactics, and the importance of controlling the high ground.I thought it was a stupid idea that unnecessarily created another level of bureaucracy.
The USAF was doing a perfectly good job coordinating with NASA on whatever defense related issues existed involving outer space.
Just another Trump glory hound attention grab.
Your IQ is at a record 60 thanks to the fact that you're a complete fucking N4T idiot.The Doomsday Clock is at a record 90 seconds thanks to Kamala and Plugs.
None of that shit has anything to do with your dumbass OP about flakes of paint destroying satellites or Putin nuking them knowing that the debris it would create would also destroy Russian satellites.And according to your messiah ...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-nuclear-weapons-threat-real-biden-warns-rcna90114
Putin nuclear weapons threat is 'real,' Biden warns
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-nuclear-weapons-threat-real-biden-warns-rcna90114
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › world › putin-nucle...
Jun 20, 2023 — President Joe Biden has warned that the threat of Russian President Vladimir Putin's using tactical nuclear weapons is “real,” as Ukraine's ...
You sure as hell don't.You know nothing about military tactics, and the importance of controlling the high ground.
Explosive diarrhea in your pants, poor thing.Your IQ is at a record 60 thanks to the fact that you're a complete fucking N4T idiot.
None of that shit has anything to do with your dumbass OP about flakes of paint destroying satellites or Putin nuking them knowing that the debris it would create would also destroy Russian satellites.
DUHHHHH
You sure as hell don't.
If my bill is 19.50, I'll give them 20.50 so I can get a dollar back. That really blows their mind.Hell, pay cash when the system is working and some teen is at the cash register. They can't make change. The math involved eludes them.
I didn't say they weren't addressed Mr. Low Attention Span.Explosive diarrhea in your pants, poor thing.
If you'd learn to read, you would know all those things have already been addressed in the thread. Poor poor Slow nomad.
When have you ever had $20?If my bill is 19.50, I'll give them 20.50 so I can get a dollar back. That really blows their mind.
The more backup infrastructure, the less you are dependent on satellites. That is just the math of the situation.the larger the population density, the more fucked you would be I'll take Wyoming and people that still know how to be self reliant any day
Do they live off the grid, or on the fringes of the grid? There is an important difference.Yep, the farther "off grid" you are, the less affected you will be.
Satellites have not been used in the first world for decades now. I still remember the problems with delays because of satellites for international phone calls, but that was back in the 1980's. Seriously fiber optic cables are literally a million times better than satellite in bandwidth, and ten to hundred times better lag.Because it's 1970...
ROFL
Just the opposite of what you claim is the reality. Copper is being expunged in the developed world. Fiber is still heavily used, Satellite is mostly for large data transfers. Point to point wireless is used more and more. Microwave and 5G LTE dominate for high speed data. LTE is susceptible to weather conditions, microwave is not, but LTE is faster and cheaper. Most backbones are still fiber, but for everything else, wireless rules.