Straight Question for the Left (and Everybody Else)

IBDaMann said:
Has anyone in the DNC considered wooing Tulsi Gabbard back over to the Democrat party with the promise that she'll be the next Presidential nominee? She would probably beat Vance. Tulsi would win. This is why I am certain the DNC wouldn't even consider the idea.
Click to expand...
What does the Democratic party need with another crazy person?
 
RB 60 said:
Jssh Shapiro

Oh, forget that, Dems hate Jews...
Click to expand...
Funny, it wasn’t a Democrat who wined and dined Holocaust deniers at his home, nor it wasn’t a Democrat who spread idiocy that Jews were using drones to start fires on the west coast

You got to turn the channel every now and then to know what is really happening
 
archives said:
There isn’t any “top candidate” at this point, rather an array of potential candidates including Governors, Senators, one Representative, and others currently not even in politics.
Click to expand...
There's always an array of candidates. surely there's a "top" one in your opinion. The reason I'm asking is because I see the same array of candidates and I'm not seeing anything even remotely viable, but of course that's just my perspective. I wanted to get other perspectives to point out what I'm not seeing.

Who is your preferred candidate right now, versus who do you think would stand the best chance at winning the Presidency right now?

archives said:
Currently Newsman is getting the most publicity and Booker leads in dollars, but neither are dominating anything. Over three years away, an eternity in politics
Click to expand...
I get it. Nonetheless, in three years, all of these "array of candidates" will still be around, and it wouldn't hurt to start considering who will be running against Vance and why.

archives said:
And why you so sure Nance will be the GOP candidate?
Click to expand...
That's the nature of certainty. It's always a sure thing.

archives said:
If Trump takes a fall, fifty fifty proposition, Nance could descend with him.
Click to expand...
Trump will ride out his Presidency. It has been revealed in my crystal ball. What has not been revealed is Vance's opponent, and that's what I'm hoping to glean (get a little insight) into what Democrats and leftists are thinking. I always like to factor that into my own thoughts on the matter.

archives said:
In three years even the GOP might have had enough Trumpism and “RINO” emerges as the savior
Click to expand...
My crystal ball says that will have to wait until after Vance's second term.
 
archives said:
Nah, no politicians who burns bridges on one side then joins the other ever really succeeds going forward, neither side really trust them
Click to expand...

America's two greatest modern day presidents were Reagan and Trump, and both of them were Democrats until they decided
that it was a disastrous failed party, and then became pro American Republicans.
 
archives said:
Nah, no politicians who burns bridges on one side then joins the other ever really succeeds going forward, neither side really trust them
Click to expand...
I get it. I'm just saying that if the DNC were to woo Tulsi back and run her against Vance, she would win. I am also saying that because she would win, the DNC doesn't want anything to do with her. The DNC didn't want anything to do with her back when she would have defeated Trump.
 
IBDaMann said:
There's always an array of candidates. surely there's a "top" one in your opinion. The reason I'm asking is because I see the same array of candidates and I'm not seeing anything even remotely viable, but of course that's just my perspective. I wanted to get other perspectives to point out what I'm not seeing.

Who is your preferred candidate right now, versus who do you think would stand the best chance at winning the Presidency right now?


I get it. Nonetheless, in three years, all of these "array of candidates" will still be around, and it wouldn't hurt to start considering who will be running against Vance and why.


That's the nature of certainty. It's always a sure thing.


Trump will ride out his Presidency. It has been revealed in my crystal ball. What has not been revealed is Vance's opponent, and that's what I'm hoping to glean (get a little insight) into what Democrats and leftists are thinking. I always like to factor that into my own thoughts on the matter.


My crystal ball says that will have to wait until after Vance's second term.
Click to expand...
Here you go, a list from both parties as to potential candidates:

Presidential candidates, 2028

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics
ballotpedia.org ballotpedia.org

Personally, Pritzker, Governors have administrative experience, he is a relative outsider, has middle left outlook, and certainly money wouldn’t be a problem

Nance may inherit MAGA, but he, like DeSanits, lack the charisma Trump has, under heavy scrutiny, he couldn’t bob and weave as Trump does

Why are you so sure Trump is exiting in 2028? As we have already seen he has doing all he can to centralize power in the Executive Branch, and now with his immunity bailout, he may decide he ain’t leaving in 2028
 
4qniw8.jpg


At this point, I expect the Democrats to go into 2028 with a stage of political midgets like this...

PHREEHUZIYI6TGQW3RKR5JNEHM.jpg


They'll squabble over details of their agenda offering nothing new or alternative. The most ardent Leftists among them might openly call for socialism, gun confiscation, etc.
 
Libhater said:
America's two greatest modern day presidents were Reagan and Trump, and both of them were Democrats until they decided
that it was a disastrous failed party, and then became pro American Republicans.
Click to expand...
Regan perhaps, but he wasn’t a leading Democrat politician prior to changing parties, and Trump, he wasn’t anything, may have been registered as a Democrat, but was just about as much a Democrat then as he is today a Republican, Trump’s only loyalty or convictions ever were always just to Trump

Last I looked historians had Trump ranked in the bottom, and please, spare us the historians are commies bullshit
 
T. A. Gardner said:
4qniw8.jpg


At this point, I expect the Democrats to go into 2028 with a stage of political midgets like this...

PHREEHUZIYI6TGQW3RKR5JNEHM.jpg


They'll squabble over details of their agenda offering nothing new or alternative. The most ardent Leftists among them might openly call for socialism, gun confiscation, etc.
Click to expand...
Thanks, just what matters most to Democrats, an opinion from a Red Hat Clubber
 
IBDaMann said:
I get it. I'm just saying that if the DNC were to woo Tulsi back and run her against Vance, she would win. I am also saying that because she would win, the DNC doesn't want anything to do with her. The DNC didn't want anything to do with her back when she would have defeated Trump.
Click to expand...
She already attempted a run and went nowhere
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Show how I'm wrong. What strong national candidate does the Democrat(ic) party have to offer right now?
Click to expand...
Three years out, several, but it is anyone’s race at this point

​

 
archives said:
She already attempted a run and went nowhere
Click to expand...
She, like say Kristen Simena, weren't sufficiently Leftist for their party. That's the problem the Democrats have today. They can't or won't run someone who isn't a Leftist. They ran Biden out of desperation needing a candidate that was at least marginally palatable to most Americans.
 
archives said:
Regan perhaps, but he wasn’t a leading Democrat politician prior to changing parties, and Trump, he wasn’t anything, may have been registered as a Democrat, but was just about as much a Democrat then as he is today a Republican, Trump’s only loyalty or convictions ever were always just to Trump

Last I looked historians had Trump ranked in the bottom, and please, spare us the historians are commies bullshit
Click to expand...

Trump's history hasn't been written yet, at least by reputable historians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top