Religious affiliation of American scientists

[Into the Night]

Einstein famously brought philosophical thinking to science.

Never did. Science isn't philosophy, although it's defined by philosophy.

He is universally considered one of history's greatest philosophers of science.

Science isn't philosophy.

The Einstein-Niels Bohr debates famously broached the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics,

Not how quantum mechanics got started.

and considered whether to consider the Copenhagen interpretation as being epistemological or ontological.

Buzzword fallacies. Science isn't philosophy.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Usually, white Christian nationalists only read material they agree with, which is why they always lose debates against prepared opponents, and then are left screaming angrily at their interlocutors in ALL CAPS rants,

You've identified a salient indicator of low IQ, poorly educated and hateful, if not evil, people: They spout their opinions then spread hate and lies against anyone who disagrees. Sad.

They claim to be Christians, but only talk the talk and never walk the walk. This proves they are evil people. Followers of a false god, mammon and Satan. Their choice.

When it comes to spreading hate and harm toward others, people will be judged by theirs actions, not just their words. IMHO, a big measure will be a scale of how much good a person did with their lives versus how much harm.

JPP proves daily that hateful people exist and that they are unrepentant, staunch members of the Alt-Right AKA the White Nationalist Party of America. The WNPA.

OTOH, your two biggest fans (not counting socks) are clearly mentally handicapped. As you know, my expertise is in "weeding out", not helping. It's taken people like my wife and others, including members of this forum, to persuade me to be more considerate of my fellow citizens.

 

[Into the Night]

You've identified a salient indicator of low IQ, poorly educated and hateful, if not evil, people: They spout their opinions then spread hate and lies against anyone who disagrees. Sad.

They claim to be Christians, but only talk the talk and never walk the walk. This proves they are evil people. Followers of a false god, mammon and Satan. Their choice.

When it comes to spreading hate and harm toward others, people will be judged by theirs actions, not just their words. IMHO, a big measure will be a scale of how much good a person did with their lives versus how much harm.

JPP proves daily that hateful people exist and that they are unrepentant, staunch members of the Alt-Right AKA the White Nationalist Party of America. The WNPA.

OTOH, your two biggest fans (not counting socks) are clearly mentally handicapped. As you know, my expertise is in "weeding out", not helping. It's taken people like my wife and others, including members of this forum, to persuade me to be more considerate of my fellow citizens.

Go stuff you racism up your butt, Sybil. There is no place for it here.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Einstein famously brought philosophical thinking to science. He is universally considered one of history's greatest philosophers of science.

The Einstein-Niels Bohr debates famously broached the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, and considered whether to consider the Copenhagen interpretation as being epistemological or ontological.

I haven't studied it close enough to know, but suspect philosophy and science have had a very long relationship.

 

[Cypress]

I haven't studied it close enough to know, but suspect philosophy and science have had a very long relationship.

A long standing practice of including philosophical interpretations in science:

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical stance on quantum mechanics that suggests that subatomic particles don't have definite properties until they are measured, and that the act of measurement causes the particle's wave function to 'collapse' into a single outcome"

Google AI

 

[Dutch Uncle]

A long standing practice of including philosophical interpretations in science:

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical stance on quantum mechanics that suggests that subatomic particles don't have definite properties until they are measured, and that the act of measurement causes the particle's wave function to 'collapse' into a single outcome"

Google AI

That quickly gets above my paygrade.

Isn't that akin to Schrödinger's cat and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?

 

[Cypress]

That quickly gets above my paygrade.

Isn't that akin to Schrödinger's cat and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?

Schroedingers cat was a thought experiment intended to poke holes in Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics.

I think the uncertainty principle can be considered akin to a fundamental law.

The Copenhagen interpretation is one of at least three main competing philosophical interpretations of the ultimate meaning of quantum mechanics.