Into the Night
Verified User
Never did. Science isn't philosophy, although it's defined by philosophy.
Science isn't philosophy.
Not how quantum mechanics got started.
Buzzword fallacies. Science isn't philosophy.
Religious affiliation of American scientists
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
You've identified a salient indicator of low IQ, poorly educated and hateful, if not evil, people: They spout their opinions then spread hate and lies against anyone who disagrees. Sad.Usually, white Christian nationalists only read material they agree with, which is why they always lose debates against prepared opponents, and then are left screaming angrily at their interlocutors in ALL CAPS rants,
They claim to be Christians, but only talk the talk and never walk the walk. This proves they are evil people. Followers of a false god, mammon and Satan. Their choice.
When it comes to spreading hate and harm toward others, people will be judged by theirs actions, not just their words. IMHO, a big measure will be a scale of how much good a person did with their lives versus how much harm.
JPP proves daily that hateful people exist and that they are unrepentant, staunch members of the Alt-Right AKA the White Nationalist Party of America. The WNPA.
OTOH, your two biggest fans (not counting socks) are clearly mentally handicapped. As you know, my expertise is in "weeding out", not helping. It's taken people like my wife and others, including members of this forum, to persuade me to be more considerate of my fellow citizens.
Into the Night
Verified User
Go stuff you racism up your butt, Sybil. There is no place for it here.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I haven't studied it close enough to know, but suspect philosophy and science have had a very long relationship.
A long standing practice of including philosophical interpretations in science:I haven't studied it close enough to know, but suspect philosophy and science have had a very long relationship.
"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical stance on quantum mechanics that suggests that subatomic particles don't have definite properties until they are measured, and that the act of measurement causes the particle's wave function to 'collapse' into a single outcome"
Google AI
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
That quickly gets above my paygrade.
Isn't that akin to Schrödinger's cat and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
Schroedingers cat was a thought experiment intended to poke holes in Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics.
I think the uncertainty principle can be considered akin to a fundamental law.
The Copenhagen interpretation is one of at least three main competing philosophical interpretations of the ultimate meaning of quantum mechanics.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
but not science........
stfu with your bullshit.
so boring.
no real impact.
masturbatory.
but not science........
stfu with your bullshit!
Laypersons who's only exposure to science was tenth grade biology class tend to think the rote stepwise procedures of the scientific method is all that science is. That's because your tenth grade biology teacher was not expected or required to give you a more complete education in the body of knowledge the scientific endeavor spans.
Science is more than just the scientific method because it includes the body of knowledge gathered over time and involves multiple, flexible processes, not just the linear, step-by-step method often taught in schools. The scientific method is a foundational tool for scientific inquiry, but actual scientific practice can involve backtracking, adapting the steps, developing models, and other creative approaches to understand the world.
Science relies on certain philosophical assumptions, such as the existence of an external reality and the consistency of natural laws. It can also be limited by a lack of current tools or technology, as seen in attempts to study phenomena that are not yet measurable.
-Google AI
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
pretentious bullshit.
you miss the point of religion and science.
and you couldn't even come up with your own answers.
you're an idiot.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
yes.I would add epistemology along with ontology as the nexus at which science and philosophy are sharing the same ground.
but you ALWAYS do dumb things.
your every thought should be rejected by your own self.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
you're describing JPP dems.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
like your mom and your football coach?I haven't studied it close enough to know, but suspect philosophy and science have had a very long relationship.
Google AI is saying exactly the same thing I said 200 posts earlier in this thread, and you are obviously angry that my statements got corroborated and confirmed.pretentious bullshit!
I accept your tacit confession that your only experience with science was ninth grade science class, which gave you the impression science was nothing more than simply following the cookbook steps of the experimental method.
Now, you suddenly and belatedly agree with me that science isn't just a cookbook method of simply following the rote steps of the experimental method, but the profession of science also crosses over into philosophical interpretation, ontology, epistemology, conjecture, thought experiment.
My work here is done
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Excellent point!I would add epistemology along with ontology as the nexus at which science and philosophy are sharing the same ground.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
yes, you do dumb things.Now, you suddenly and belatedly agree with me that science isn't just a cookbook method of simply following the rote steps of the experimental method, but the profession of science also crosses over into philosophical interpretation, ontology, epistemology, conjecture, thought experiment.
My work here is done
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
You made the observation hundreds of posts ago that science and philosophy have some overlap.