Religious affiliation of American scientists

[Hume]

I challenge you to walk into any university physics department and harangue a physics professor that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics has nothing to do with science and does not belong in the scientific endeavor.

That guy does not even know basic grammar. What do you expect?!

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

I challenge you to walk into any university physics department and harangue a physics professor that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics has nothing to do with science and does not belong in the scientific endeavor.

I'm more of a Skoal guy.


Bandits for the win.

 

[gmark77]

your MAGA buddies

My maga buddies. LOL

LOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOL

 

[gmark77]

I challenge you to walk into any university physics department and harangue a physics professor that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics has nothing to do with science and does not belong in the scientific endeavor.

Yup. That poster is about the speed of your debate. You should try debating someone who actually knows some shit. But when that happens you usually pitch a fit and start insulting people.

Why don't you just scream "BOHR" at him a bit more.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

 

[Cypress]

You should try debating someone who actually knows some shit! But when that happens you usually pitch a fit and start insulting people!

ftfy...^^ Sadly, Perry is always trying to derail the thread and make it about his petty grievances about me

 

[Cypress]

Why don't you just scream "BOHR" at him a bit more!

ftfy....You and my hostile interlocutor would have never heard me mention Niel Bohr and the Copenhagen Interpretation, if you had just accepted I was correct that science includes philosophical Interpretations, thought experiments, etc.

If you want to find someone to blame for why Niels Bohr and Erwin Schrodinger were even brought up in this thread, then take a good look in the mirror.

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical and physical framework for understanding quantum mechanics, emphasizing that a quantum particle exists in all possible states (superposition) until it is measured, at which point its state "collapses" into a single, definitive outcome. It challenges philosophical realism by suggesting that properties of quantum objects are not determinate until they are observed "

-Google AI

 

[gmark77]

ftfy....You and my hostile interlocutor would have never heard me mention Niel Bohr and the Copenhagen Interpretation, if you had just accepted I was correct that science includes philosophical Interpretations, thought experiments, etc.

If only we would have let little Cypress say whatever the fuck he wants to say. Little Cypress will stamp his widdle feet and pound his widdle fists.

So angry little Cypress is.

 

[gmark77]

ftfy....You and my hostile interlocutor would have never heard me mention Niel Bohr and the Copenhagen Interpretation, if you had just accepted I was correct that science includes philosophical Interpretations, thought experiments, etc.

Ummm, Hey fuckwit, if you are so very smart, then show me where I discussed the Copenhagen Interp. I just suggested that you scream Bohr at the other fuck up you argue with (because you can't argue with someone who actually knows shit)

 

[Into the Night]

A long standing practice of including philosophical interpretations in science:

Philosophy isn't 'interpretation', Cyborg. Science is not philosophy either.

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical stance on quantum mechanics that suggests that subatomic particles don't have definite properties until they are measured, and that the act of measurement causes the particle's wave function to 'collapse' into a single outcome"

Google AI

Not philosophy, Cyborg.

 

[Into the Night]

Schroedingers cat was a thought experiment intended to poke holes in Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics.

There is no 'Bohr interpretation of quantum mechanics, Cyborg.
Schroedinger's cat is not science.

I think the uncertainty principle can be considered akin to a fundamental law.

There is no such thing as a 'fundamental law', Cyborg.

The Copenhagen interpretation is one of at least three main competing philosophical interpretations of the ultimate meaning of quantum mechanics.

There is no 'ultimate meaning' of quantum mechanics. Religion is not science.

 

[Into the Night]

Laypersons who's only exposure to science was tenth grade biology class

Science is not a class.

tend to think the rote stepwise procedures of the scientific method is all that science is.

Science is not a method or procedure.

That's because your tenth grade biology teacher was not expected or required to give you a more complete education in the body of knowledge the scientific endeavor spans.

Science is not an 'endeavor span'.

Science is more than just the scientific method ​

Science is not a method or procedure.

because it includes the body of knowledge​

Science is not knowledge.

gathered over time and involves multiple, flexible processes, not just the linear, step-by-step method often taught in schools. The scientific method is a foundational tool for scientific inquiry, but actual scientific practice can involve backtracking, adapting the steps, developing models, and other creative approaches to understand the world. ​

​

Science is not a method or procedure. Science is not a 'practice' or profession.

Science relies on certain philosophical assumptions, such as the existence of an external reality and the consistency of natural laws. It can also be limited by a lack of current tools or technology, as seen in attempts to study phenomena that are not yet measurable. ​

​

-Google AI​

Buzzword fallacies. Go learn what philosophy is, what 'reality' is, what a natural constant is, and what a falsifiable theory is.

 

[Into the Night]

I would add epistemology along with ontology as the nexus at which science and philosophy are sharing the same ground.

Science is not philosophy, Cyborg.

 

[Cypress]

Ummm, Hey fuckwit!

ftfy....were one of the belligerent interlocutors who kept insisting to me that anything that isn't testable is never, ever allowed in the field of science.

You could have just accepted that I was correct.

Instead, it was your fault (along w/your friends ITN and Fredy Figbottom) that I even had to bring up minutia like string theory, the Copenhagen Interpretation, NielsBohr, Schrodingers Cat.

 

[Into the Night]

My belligerent interlocutors usually get angry when the statements I make are corroborated by reliable outside sources.

Void reference fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

"The Copenhagen interpretation is a philosophical and physical framework for understanding quantum mechanics, emphasizing that a quantum particle exists in all possible states (superposition) until it is measured, at which point its state "collapses" into a single, definitive outcome. It challenges philosophical realism by suggesting that properties of quantum objects are not determinate until they are observed "

-Google AI

Not philosophy, Cyborg.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Oooh, @Cypress , you know what I want: I want to be on your knees before you and appreciating your manhood.

You're weird.

 

[Into the Night]

The Copenhagen Interpretation and Schrodingers Cat are universally understood to be part and parcel of the scientific endeavor, even though they are philosophical interpretations and thought experiments respectively.

Science is not 'an endeavor'. Schrodinger's cat is not science. Science is not philosophy.

 

[Hume]

Science is not 'an endeavor'. Schrodinger's cat is not science. Science is not philosophy.

And you are severely mentally ill.

 

[Into the Night]

I challenge you to walk into any university physics department and harangue a physics professor that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics has nothing to do with science and does not belong in the scientific endeavor.

Science isn't a university or a professor. You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Science is not an 'interpretation'. Science is not an endeavor.