shorter dicks....

Like abortion because its convenient for the women....

That was in response to
Originally Posted by apple0154 View Post
So you base the validity of circumcision solely on the fact it has been commonly practiced?

In that case other barbaric rituals commonly practiced elsewhere should also be considered OK.

You just had to sneak that in there. Oh, well. Abortion prevents child abuse, remember? We've been through this before.
 
Circumcision makes it easier for young boys to keep themselves clean, and helps eliminate the threat of infection. I also had to deal with the issue of the foreskin pushing up and causing minor aches. Once I started masturbating the problem went away, of course...
 
Even more reason to respect their rights, as they are not in a position to do so themselves.

Then let's just do away with parental notification altogether. Police/prosecutors can now question minors without parents present. Minors now make their medical decisions instead of parents. Students no longer need parental signatures/approval for anything. Etc.
 
Then let's just do away with parental notification altogether. Police/prosecutors can now question minors without parents present. Minors now make their medical decisions instead of parents. Students no longer need parental signatures/approval for anything. Etc.

That's a totally absurd response.
 
He can't get no satisfaction
He can't get no satisfaction
'Cause he tries and he tries and he tries and he tries
He can't get no, he can't get no


The mere thought of seeing his morbid obesity in all it's naked glory is enough to cause a catastrophic vomit explosion that would bury the state of Texas.
 
So you are a qualified doctor now?

biased doctors....perhaps you should just respect all those doctors that said smoking doesn't cause cancer....

how hypocritical tom...i give you doctor reports that you dismiss out of hand, are you are qualified doctor? face it, those risks YOUR biased doctors spoke are very, very rare. there is more risk of your child getting sims than those risks. you're being disengious in order to try and pass off your BELIEFS as fact.

you've now run away from your claim that male and female circumcision are similiar, this is as step in teh right direction tom. perhaps you can't take a breath and reevaluate your position because its already changed just in this very thread.
 
Tom, you're an idiot. At least in this thread. You've been burned at every turn, from the ear piercing SET-UP, to the asinine comparisons/analogies, to the self-pwn about sensitivity, to the other self-pwn where you claimed doing it for society's women is an inferior reason. Hell, women are expected to shave their junk, so I guess that's barbaric as well...

I'm an anti-shaver. Hair holds pheromones and I just LOVE the scent of a woman!
 
Women claim the right to have control over their own bodies, so why isn't that the same for men?
If they really want to they can reverse it later in life. But who the heck wants an ugly penis that takes special attention to keep care of and is always vulnerable to infection?

The point Tom, is that this causes no ill effect to the "men", isn't mutilation like female circumcision, and IMO is a valid action in preventative medicine that people should have the choice to do for their child. The idea that they don't like it so they are going to tell you what to do. What next, ban formula? What if the child refuses breast milk?
 
Back
Top