shorter dicks....

Same with ADD. Lots of kids have it and a portion of them get medical intervention without their permission. SF should ban ADD medication, according to you Tom.
 
Topspin said:
it's not, but most think it's funny when one claims a law degree and then retracts the claim.
Click to expand...

this is probably the sixth time i've had to remind you why i now do not talk about what i do....i sent you a PM detailing WHY and yet you act as if i never sent it

after maineman's stalking, i simply don't talk about my private life with any modicum of seriousness. can you get that through you retarded brain? or do i have to repeat it every day to you?
 
tom prendergast said:
It is the same principle because it is an unnecessary medical intervention performed without the permission of the person in question.
Click to expand...

not true. one is mutilation, the other is not. further, it is NOT always medical "intervention" as it is a religious practice. do i need to teach you what medical intervention means?

a parent could raise their kid a vegan, are you now going to argue that this is BRAINWASHING their kid? because the kid did not give the parent permission to raise them in such a manner and now they are forever mentally scarred as a result of their upbringing.

circumcision does not damage the penis. and as i have repeatedly told you, it has been PROVEN to be a medical benefit. shit, if twins were born conjoined, you would not allow the doctors to use surgery to seperate them. how in the world can you justify such an ignorant POV?
 
Yurt said:
this is probably the sixth time i've had to remind you why i now do not talk about what i do....i sent you a PM detailing WHY and yet you act as if i never sent it

after maineman's stalking, i simply don't talk about my private life with any modicum of seriousness. can you get that through you retarded brain? or do i have to repeat it every day to you?
Click to expand...
Quit giving out personal information, you dope....don't let anyone gloat you into doing that.
 
bravo said:
Quit giving out personal information, you dope....don't let anyone gloat you into doing that.
Click to expand...

i haven't lately....that was BEFORE maineman's stalking, i made one comment about it on USMB to another person and topshit has hounded me about it ever since, so i told him to fuck off and that i was a garbage collector or something....thinking that joking about it would cause the nitwits to stop obsessing over what i do for a living. who cares. unless you're like jarod who frequently talks about his job and his greatness at being a lawyer....i don't see how it is relevant
 
Yurt said:
not true. one is mutilation, the other is not. further, it is NOT always medical "intervention" as it is a religious practice. do i need to teach you what medical intervention means?

a parent could raise their kid a vegan, are you now going to argue that this is BRAINWASHING their kid? because the kid did not give the parent permission to raise them in such a manner and now they are forever mentally scarred as a result of their upbringing.

circumcision does not damage the penis. and as i have repeatedly told you, it has been PROVEN to be a medical benefit. shit, if twins were born conjoined, you would not allow the doctors to use surgery to seperate them. how in the world can you justify such an ignorant POV?
Click to expand...

Sacrificing babies to the Gods used to be a religious practice, would you advocate that? Vegans can always eat meat, try getting your foreskin back. Siamese twins, well that's just bullshit and those medical benefits are dubious at best except maybe in Africa where sex without condoms is rife and many men are not very hygienic. Also no medical procedure is risk free except of course in your world.
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
And we know this by our dealing with the pinheads every day right here.:palm:
Click to expand...
sd_coneheads_01_large.jpg
 
tom prendergast said:
Sacrificing babies to the Gods used to be a religious practice, would you advocate that? Vegans can always eat meat, try getting your foreskin back. Siamese twins, well that's just bullshit and those medical benefits are dubious at best except maybe in Africa where sex without condoms is rife and many men are not very hygienic. Also no medical procedure is risk free except of course in your world.
Click to expand...

I've never seen a man so preoccupied with his and others men's foreskins. If you're trying to substantiate your ugly member, fine, but enough already!

Outlaw in the UK already and until then STFU and STFD!
 
wow how many times does Tom come back to get slapped in the face. LOL

Nice burn preoccupied with other's foreskin. Priceless
 
tom prendergast said:
Sacrificing babies to the Gods used to be a religious practice, would you advocate that? Vegans can always eat meat, try getting your foreskin back. Siamese twins, well that's just bullshit and those medical benefits are dubious at best except maybe in Africa where sex without condoms is rife and many men are not very hygienic. Also no medical procedure is risk free except of course in your world.
Click to expand...

so let me get this straight...removing foreskin is akin to sacrificing babies. real logical there tom. how are siamese twins bullshit? oh, is it because you agree with seperating them, a medical procedure without their consent that can never be taken back?

tell me the medical harm that has resulted from being circumcised. surely you have some stats to make such a wild claim. that like saying, no swimming is risk free of drowning. does this mean we should not swim?

the medical benefits have been proven in numerous studies. it isn't just aids. face it, there is virtually zero harm in being circumcised, quite the opposite of female circumcision. why haven't you been able to tell me the difference between the two? i've asked you 3 times now, perhaps you really don't want to know, because the knowledge would show you're wrong.
 
Yurt said:
so let me get this straight...removing foreskin is akin to sacrificing babies. real logical there tom. how are siamese twins bullshit? oh, is it because you agree with seperating them, a medical procedure without their consent that can never be taken back?

tell me the medical harm that has resulted from being circumcised. surely you have some stats to make such a wild claim. that like saying, no swimming is risk free of drowning. does this mean we should not swim?

the medical benefits have been proven in numerous studies. it isn't just aids. face it, there is virtually zero harm in being circumcised, quite the opposite of female circumcision. why haven't you been able to tell me the difference between the two? i've asked you 3 times now, perhaps you really don't want to know, because the knowledge would show you're wrong.
Click to expand...

Are really so stupid as to believe I don't know the difference between male and female circumcision? I wouldn't presume you to be so ignorant, arrogant yes, ignorant no. Here is a medical study on the dramatically increased risk of MSRA from male infant circumcision. There are virtually no antibiotics left that treat MRSA so why would you want to increase the chances of it becoming resistant to Vancomycin, one of the few that still works? Here is a quote from the article.

Doctors Opposing Circumcision consistently has advised parents that genital integrity (non-circumcision) is most likely to produce the highest state of health and well-being56,57 and is the preferred medical option for newborn boys.61 The arrival of community MRSA in epidemic proportions adds additional force to that recommendation.

Public health officials should act to suspend the performance of medically-unnecessary non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.

Hospital administrators must respond to this new threat to all newborn infants and especially circumcised male infants by limiting circumcisions to those for which there is a clear and present immediate medical indication and by increasing aseptic protocols in newborn nurseries.

Medical practitioners must consider the epidemic status of MRSA and exercise their independent judgment regarding the performance of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. There is an ethical duty to decline and avoid scientifically invalid treatment, especially when it puts the patient at risk.60 Doctors must act in the best interests of their child-patients regardless of parental requests.63-65 Doctors may conscientiously object to the performance of non-therapeutic circumcision of children.64-66


http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/mrsa.html
 
Last edited:
tom prendergast said:
I wholeheartedly agree with this, how anybody in this day and age can support this barbaric practice is beyond me? If you think that female circumcision is disgusting then the same should apply to the male version. Nobody in Europe does this apart from Jews and Muslims. If somebody wants to do this when they are an adult that's their decision but to to take the choice away is a violation of human rights.
Click to expand...

UH - Female circumcison involves the removal of the entire clitoris.
Are you assuming that male circumcision involves removing the entire head of the penis.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
I am sorry you are offended by my elephant trunk analogy, it's just the way
I see it. Where did I ever say vaginas are attractive, Precious?

You don't want to tidy up your uncircumcised penis then by all means
Don't let ANYONE stop you. Seeing how you take care of your teeth
In the UK, is it any wonder?
Click to expand...

Not sure why you'd associate teeth with uncircumcised penises but you sure know how to unsettle a man. :chesh:
 
christiefan915 said:
Okay, here's an example.

Suppose both a snipped and unsnipped man get a chance to have sex with Angelina Jolie. Each comes away from the experience saying "man, that was the best sex I ever had."

The snipped guy can't compare his pleasure to the unsnipped because it's all subjective.
Click to expand...

I don't think either guy would complain. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top