shorter dicks....

Damocles said:
Mostly because it takes nothing away from the enjoyment of sex for the male while offering different positives. There is pretty much zero positives that go with female "circumcision"...

Female circumcision takes away the ability to enjoy sex for the woman. It is mutilation.
Click to expand...

There's an argument to be made that it increases pleasure for the woman. Why don't liberals want women to have orgasms?
 
I have to admit that USA had a sweet dentist burn earlier.

And I personally take credit for starting the Burn the crocked teeth Brit roll.
 
tom prendergast said:
The principle is exactly the same, as a lawyer I'm sure you know that's true.
Click to expand...

it is not the same at all....i'm a meter maid, not a lawyer and even i know the difference, pity you don't

i even gave you medical reasons they are different, but you ignore reality that doesn't comport to your world view. medical speaking, they are not even close to being the same. you need to read up on this, you're making a fool out of yourself.
 
Yurt said:
it is not the same at all....i'm a meter maid, not a lawyer and even i know the difference, pity you don't

i even gave you medical reasons they are different, but you ignore reality that doesn't comport to your world view. medical speaking, they are not even close to being the same. you need to read up on this, you're making a fool out of yourself.
Click to expand...

I said the principle is the same, so stop trying to twist things as you usually do.
 
don't know, do know he gave me some good tips on diff places to consider on Moving to cali. I think he's that rarest breed, a CALIFORNIA CONSERVATIVE
 
He maybe a 39 yr old law student still living at home. I know he's too ashamed to list his profession. LOL
 
tom prendergast said:
I said the principle is the same, so stop trying to twist things as you usually do.
Click to expand...

how am i twisting anything you're saying? the principle is physically impossible to being the same. its like saying cutting your child's hair is the same as female circumcision.

being a lawyer has nothing to do with knowing the principle. you just like to make things personal because you're a petty twit. its a simple medical issue. had you clicked on the links i gave you, you would not be still be spouting this nonsense. if you want to make an analogy, female circumcision is the same thing as cutting off the entire head of the penis. getting rid of foreskin, which i gave you links that showed it actually has medical benefits, is not mutilation.
 
Yurt said:
how am i twisting anything you're saying? the principle is physically impossible to being the same. its like saying cutting your child's hair is the same as female circumcision.

being a lawyer has nothing to do with knowing the principle. you just like to make things personal because you're a petty twit. its a simple medical issue. had you clicked on the links i gave you, you would not be still be spouting this nonsense. if you want to make an analogy, female circumcision is the same thing as cutting off the entire head of the penis. getting rid of foreskin, which i gave you links that showed it actually has medical benefits, is not mutilation.
Click to expand...

It is the same principle because it is an unnecessary medical intervention performed without the permission of the person in question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top