shorter dicks....

Its not subjective. I have to live everyday with the shame of knowing I'm different from other guys in the eyes of society. Its not as bad as being small, but it is an annoyance.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Tom the "trumpeteer"

African_Elephant_Trunk.jpg
Click to expand...

Above, you will find a photo of just how large a "trumpet" it takes to satisfy our frigid IceQueen of the NorthWest...when she's not "playing her own instrument" that is.

:lol:
 
Tom, you're an idiot. At least in this thread. You've been burned at every turn, from the ear piercing SET-UP, to the asinine comparisons/analogies, to the self-pwn about sensitivity, to the other self-pwn where you claimed doing it for society's women is an inferior reason. Hell, women are expected to shave their junk, so I guess that's barbaric as well...
 
Threedee said:
Tom, you're an idiot. At least in this thread. You've been burned at every turn, from the ear piercing SET-UP, to the asinine comparisons/analogies, to the self-pwn about sensitivity, to the other self-pwn where you claimed doing it for society's women is an inferior reason. Hell, women are expected to shave their junk, so I guess that's barbaric as well...
Click to expand...

Apparently there are a lot of idiots in the US medical profession also, funnily enough Doctors Opposing Circumcision is based in Market Street, Seattle. Maybe you could go down there and tell them they are idiots?

http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/mrsa.html
 
tom prendergast said:
Are really so stupid as to believe I don't know the difference between male and female circumcision? I wouldn't presume you to be so ignorant, arrogant yes, ignorant no. Here is a medical study on the dramatically increased risk of MSRA from male infant circumcision. There are virtually no antibiotics left that treat MRSA so why would you want to increase the chances of it becoming resistant to Vancomycin, one of the few that still works? Here is a quote from the article.

Doctors Opposing Circumcision consistently has advised parents that genital integrity (non-circumcision) is most likely to produce the highest state of health and well-being56,57 and is the preferred medical option for newborn boys.61 The arrival of community MRSA in epidemic proportions adds additional force to that recommendation.

Public health officials should act to suspend the performance of medically-unnecessary non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.

Hospital administrators must respond to this new threat to all newborn infants and especially circumcised male infants by limiting circumcisions to those for which there is a clear and present immediate medical indication and by increasing aseptic protocols in newborn nurseries.

Medical practitioners must consider the epidemic status of MRSA and exercise their independent judgment regarding the performance of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. There is an ethical duty to decline and avoid scientifically invalid treatment, especially when it puts the patient at risk.60 Doctors must act in the best interests of their child-patients regardless of parental requests.63-65 Doctors may conscientiously object to the performance of non-therapeutic circumcision of children.64-66


http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/mrsa.html
Click to expand...

LOL...a study by a group that is opposed to male circumcision....give me a break tom...at leat the links i gave you were unbiased

your comments in this thread comparing male circumcision to female circumcision leads me to believe you don't know the difference. you've repeatedly said that if one is against male circumcision, then they should be against female circumcision. that precisely means you're comparing them as similar or identical. when in fact, MEDICALLY, they are nothing remotely similiar or identical.

you can try to pass off your BELIEFS that the practice is barbaric, however, your BELIEFS do not make it a fact. it is not a violation of human rights. that is the most absurd thing i've ever heard.
 
Yurt said:
LOL...a study by a group that is opposed to male circumcision....give me a break tom...at leat the links i gave you were unbiased

your comments in this thread comparing male circumcision to female circumcision leads me to believe you don't know the difference. you've repeatedly said that if one is against male circumcision, then they should be against female circumcision. that precisely means you're comparing them as similar or identical. when in fact, MEDICALLY, they are nothing remotely similiar or identical.

you can try to pass off your BELIEFS that the practice is barbaric, however, your BELIEFS do not make it a fact. it is not a violation of human rights. that is the most absurd thing i've ever heard.
Click to expand...

You said there was practically zero medical risk, I showed you a study that stated that there is a significant risk and you just dismiss it out of hand. Why am I not surprised?
 
Yurt said:
LOL...a study by a group that is opposed to male circumcision....give me a break tom...at leat the links i gave you were unbiased

your comments in this thread comparing male circumcision to female circumcision leads me to believe you don't know the difference. you've repeatedly said that if one is against male circumcision, then they should be against female circumcision. that precisely means you're comparing them as similar or identical. when in fact, MEDICALLY, they are nothing remotely similiar or identical.

you can try to pass off your BELIEFS that the practice is barbaric, however, your BELIEFS do not make it a fact. it is not a violation of human rights. that is the most absurd thing i've ever heard.
Click to expand...

I likewise supplied an extnsive link with several pages of studies and personal stories... mr trumpet dick is just being a nancy boy about his weird looking appendage :rofl:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top