Define a 'Liberal' or a 'Conservative'

It is his statements like the one you mentioned that make me question if he doesn't want to jump the line and dabble! Projection, you know!

It is my personal belief that he is gay, but conflicted. He has been taught that it is 'wrong' and his religious convictions, noble as they might be to him, are conflicting with his personal desires. Hence he is angry with other gay people who have had the courage to come out of the closet over the years and to stand proud about who they are. He wants to be able to do that, but cannot, because his religious convictions are too strong.
 
So a straight couple is so fundamentally WEAK, that a change in the mere definition of a WORD will make them weaker? Are you suggesting that straight couples are THAT pathetic? That a definition can hurt them?

This is a straw man argument, the same type that you rail against here:

This is the absurdity that most left wingers take when describing libertarians. Just stop. It is pathetic. Libertarians do not want 'NO government' or 'NO taxes' etc... it is not the absolute you pretend it is.
 
This is a straw man argument, the same type that you rail against here:

That is not a straw man my friend.... he is suggesting that redefining the term marriage somehow makes traditional marriages weaker. I am attempting to probe that statement to find out HOW it makes them weaker? Thus far he has given no evidence. Hence the questions posed to him.

A gay couple being allowed to marry would not affect the relationship you have with your wife would it?
 
HE is all of them and I suspect ALias, too! They have to change names, everyone eventually puts them on ignore! Then they have to, or talk only to yurt and loyaldancinginherend.
 
This tired insult again. Its still funny though, because it points out the hypocrisy of liberals by calling folks that they disagree with "gay". :lol:

actually that was not an insult. It was an observation. I leave open the possibility that I could be wrong. But it is a tendency for those who protest the most are those that are angry with themselves for not being true to themselves.
 
A Liberal is someone who thinks if you get sick and need help, the Government should help...

A Conservative is someone who thinks if you get sick and need help...too bad...you should be left to die...



The audience Monday night’s CNN Tea Party Express Republican primary debate was eager to see the death of a hypothetical man who was in a coma and also did not have health care insurance.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer posed this question to Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul: “A healthy young, 30-year-old man has a good job, makes a good living but decides, ‘You know what? I’m not going to spend $200 or $300 a month on health insurance because I’m healthy, I don’t need it.’ But something terrible happens, all the sudden he needs it. What’s going to happen if he goes into a coma? Who pays for that?”

“What he should do is whatever he wants to do,” Paul replied. “That’s what freedom is all about, taking your own risks. This whole idea that you have to prepare to take care of everybody…”

“Are you saying society should just let him die?” Blitzer asked.

The audience responded with shouts of “Yes!”
A hospital won't 'let him die'. They have to treat him. He can pay it off later (and there are a surprising number of ways to pay, at substantially low rates).
 
That is not a straw man my friend.... he is suggesting that redefining the term marriage somehow makes traditional marriages weaker. I am attempting to probe that statement to find out HOW it makes them weaker? Thus far he has given no evidence. Hence the questions posed to him.

A gay couple being allowed to marry would not affect the relationship you have with your wife would it?
That's not my argument. I've stated that traditional marriage is the backbone of the family, which in turn is the backbone of society, so society has an obligation to protect it.
 
Back
Top