10 Things the Church Should Know about Homosexuality

Rana said:
Homosexuality, between two consenting adults is not a sin. The site gives the proper interpretations of Scripture.
Click to expand...

The Bible clearly does condemn homosexuality. It also says that eating shrimp is an abomination, and that it's A-okay to beat a slave half to death.

Point being, the Bible says a lot of crazy shit. Isn't it time to move on as a society? Why are we still holding stories written by sheep farmers 3,000 years ago in such high regard?
 
Voltaire said:
The Bible clearly does condemn homosexuality. It also says that eating shrimp is an abomination, and that it's A-okay to beat a slave half to death.

Point being, the Bible says a lot of crazy shit. Isn't it time to move on as a society? Why are we still holding stories written by sheep farmers 3,000 years ago in such high regard?
Click to expand...

As an atheist, and a "non-believer", you can't "credibly" comment on the God, religion, the Bible, or dogma and doctrine. So STFU.
 
Voltaire said:
Who gives a damn? The bible is all fairy tales anyway.

You can't polish a turd.
Click to expand...

And you've just disrespected and dismissed the faith and beliefs of countless others, among some here, which they are entitled to, under the first amendment to the Constitution, a document, I would imagine you hold in "high esteem". So either you're the worst hypocrite, and don't believe or support what is written, or you're not an American, at all, and your words are contemptible and you should be shunned or ignored.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I think that ranks alongside your ridiculous assertion that AIDS was a man made disease designed by whites to oppress Africans.
Click to expand...

My assertion? Google the Rolling Stones expose' from about 10 years ago. It's a business. Read the book, "...and the band played on". I don't express ridiculous assertions...you underestimate white greed and avarice. I don't.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
It's a barking mad conspiracy theory that has been totally discredited and is only believed by charlatans and the dim witted.

http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/aids.asp
Click to expand...

Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
 
poet said:
Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
Click to expand...

A belief in barking mad CT theories like the origin of AIDS is a good indicator, in my view, to a person's credibility generally.
 
poet said:
Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
Click to expand...

Do you believe that ranting and raving enhances your argument?
 
poet said:
And Paul needed to dot the i's and cross the t's of Christ Jesus????????????????????? Paul, was rumored to be a latent homosexual and a virulent misogynist. I don't put much faith in his letters or his teachings.

And since you're so well-read and versed, why don't you explain for us? Why is #8 wrong, and what did Paul say to justify that position?
Click to expand...

Number 8 has nothing to do with whether Jesus said it, hence the reason I pointed it out as number 8 being wrong. It simply says that they "must" follow Leviticus. That's flat wrong.
 
poet said:
Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
Click to expand...

why are you so bitter?
 
poet said:
I will if I want to. I mean, who are you to tell me otherwise? A "failed" semanarian?
Click to expand...

/shrugs.....didn't fail.....and the reason I tell you otherwise is because I have presented the evidence to prove you wrong and you simply refuse to read it.......someone who refuses to read the evidence that proves he is wrong shouldn't pretend his posts on the subject are truthful.......
 
Rana said:
Homosexuality, between two consenting adults is not a sin. The site gives the proper interpretations of Scripture.
Click to expand...

actually, it doesn't....it states
Leviticus, in the Hebrew Scriptures, condemns homosexual behaviour, at least for males. Yet, "abomination", the word Leviticus uses to describe homosexuality, is the same word used to describe a menstruating woman.
Click to expand...

while it is true that the English word "abomination" is the same word, the Hebrew word translated into English is different from the Hebrew word used to describe a menstruating woman.....
 
poet said:
Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
Click to expand...

WE HAVE A WHINE SPILLAGE ON AISLE 10.
PLEASE BRING A BIG BOX OF KLEENEX WITH YOU.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
/shrugs.....didn't fail.....and the reason I tell you otherwise is because I have presented the evidence to prove you wrong and you simply refuse to read it.......someone who refuses to read the evidence that proves he is wrong shouldn't pretend his posts on the subject are truthful.......
Click to expand...

Hebrew is irrelevant to the New Testament. Hello? Aramaic, Greek, and Latin, are the languages of Jesus' day, in relation to Christianity. Of course I refuse to read your propaganda, touted as evidence and proof. It serves your agenda. Mine serves mine. What's the problem? I can't help it, if you're lacking in your powers of persuasion. Go have a good cry.
 
poet said:
Hebrew is irrelevant to the New Testament.
Click to expand...

Leviticus isn't in the New Testament......my "propaganda" was the unaltered text of the original Hebrew of Leviticus....true.....it served my agenda, which was to present you with the unaltered original Hebrew text of Leviticus......and, to show everyone else it is foolish to claim "the Bible says...." when you refuse to read what the Bible says......
 
poet said:
Do I fucking tell you what to believe, you lowlife. Aren't you the one, sitting over there, with a figurehead monarchy, and Parliament that resembles Saturday Night wrestling?
Why don't you treat yourself to a "fish and chips", and choke on it, as you imagine me laughing my ass off?
Click to expand...

Well you are the one that tries to pass himself off as rational and objective whilst clinging to loony theories that have long ago been discredited.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top