2016 was the Last Election for White America

[Jack]

So she has no guts!

Maybe she is shy?

 

[Mason Melchizedek]

Maybe she is shy?

Maybe she is chickenshit!

 

[Jack]

 

[Nordberg]

Wups. You forgot the Environmental Protection Agency. They're unconstitutional too.

Promote the general welfare is in the preamble. You would lose in court against that.
Can you imagine someone talking about eliminating Health and human & Sevices when a pandemic might be coming? HHS includes the Office of Health preparedness and response,, the hospital preparedness program and the program that deals with emerging and Zootic Infectious diseases.

 

[Into the Night]

Promote the general welfare is in the preamble.

Not a power or authority. A directive. You cannot use that to circumvent the remainder of the constitution, dude.

You would lose in court against that.

No court has authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III.

Can you imagine someone talking about eliminating Health and human & Sevices when a pandemic might be coming?

Irrelevant. I am talking about the EPA. But since you decided to bring them up, they are unconstitutional too and should be dissolved. Again, it's a State and local issue, if anything.

 

[Nordberg]

Not a power or authority. A directive. You cannot use that to circumvent the remainder of the constitution, dude.

No court has authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III.

Irrelevant. I am talking about the EPA. But since you decided to bring them up, they are unconstitutional too and should be dissolved. Again, it's a State and local issue, if anything.

That preamble clause has been used by the Supreme court many times. As usual. you are wrong..
Are you familiar with the originalism argument/? That is exactly what it is doing. It interprets the constitution and pretends to understand what the writers were thinking. Interpretation is what the supreme court does.
remember the clause. It explains why you are wrong about the EPA and many other of your claims.

 

[Teflon Don]

That preamble clause has been used by the Supreme court many times. As usual. you are wrong..
Are you familiar with the originalism argument/? That is exactly what it is doing. It interprets the constitution and pretends to understand what the writers were thinking. Interpretation is what the supreme court does.
remember the clause. It explains why you are wrong about the EPA and many other of your claims.

Where in the original text of the Constitution did the Founders say it was the Supreme Courts job to be the final “interpretation” of said Constitution?

That was a power it gave itself with a ruling and the Legislative and Executive branches acquiesced

It has done irreparable damage to our Republic

 

[Nordberg]

Where in the original text of the Constitution did the Founders say it was the Supreme Courts job to be the final “interpretation” of said Constitution?

That was a power it gave itself with a ruling and the Legislative and Executive branches acquiesced

It has done irreparable damage to our Republic

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx
I hate conversing with lots of rightys. They are clueless

 

[Into the Night]

That preamble clause has been used by the Supreme court many times. As usual. you are wrong..

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III.

Are you familiar with the originalism argument/? That is exactly what it is doing. It interprets the constitution and pretends to understand what the writers were thinking. Interpretation is what the supreme court does.

Nope. See Article III.

It explains why you are wrong about the EPA and many other of your claims.

Nope. The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution or interpret it. See Article III for what the Supreme Court CAN do.

 

[Into the Night]

...deleted Holy Quote...
I hate conversing with lots of rightys. They are clueless

The ONLY authoritative reference of the Constitution is the Constitution, dumbass.
NO court has the authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Nordberg]

Where in the original text of the Constitution did the Founders say it was the Supreme Courts job to be the final “interpretation” of said Constitution?

That was a power it gave itself with a ruling and the Legislative and Executive branches acquiesced

It has done irreparable damage to our Republic

here. you really are living in a right wing fog. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx That is what they do.