Mason Michaels
Verified User
Can you see a world with more people than Jobs?
A world that builds For-Profit Prisons.
Prisons that hold the 'excess people'.
Welcome to 2020 Trump's America!
Can you see a world with more people than Jobs?
A world that builds For-Profit Prisons.
Prisons that hold the 'excess people'.
Once the Capitalists understand they can't sell Gizmos to people that have no money, they will be the biggest proponents to Andrew Yang and his Universal Basic Income.
Once the Capitalists understand they can't sell Gizmos to people that have no money, they will be the biggest proponents to Andrew Yang and his Universal Basic Income.
Never happen.
The appeal of UBI has less to do with consumption and more to do with efficiency. The problem with Yang's proposal is that he wants to add UBI to the current welfare system. That would be financial suicide.
UBI should instead replace the welfare state. It would be vastly more efficient, and we could lay off a lot of the dead weight in government. The overall cost would be a lot less than the current welfare state as well, as long as the stipend is relatively low.
Can you see a world with more people than Jobs?
A world that builds For-Profit Prisons.
Prisons that hold the 'excess people'.
As automation takes over more Jobs, it will be the only.
Welcome to 2020 Trump's America!
Can you see a world with more people than Jobs?
A world that builds For-Profit Prisons.
Prisons that hold the 'excess people'.
Can you see a world with more people than Jobs?
Welcome to 2020 Trump's America!
The appeal of UBI has less to do with consumption and more to do with efficiency. The problem with Yang's proposal is that he wants to add UBI to the current welfare system. That would be financial suicide.
UBI should instead replace the welfare state. It would be vastly more efficient, and we could lay off a lot of the dead weight in government. The overall cost would be a lot less than the current welfare state as well, as long as the stipend is relatively low.
As automation takes over more Jobs, it will be the only.
"First, if you're already receiving some forms of government aid — such as food stamps or TANF — then under Yang's plan you would choose to keep your current benefits or take the $1,000-a-month UBI instead. In other words, rather than stacking atop the existing welfare state, Yang's Freedom Dividend would replace portions of it depending on recipients' voluntary decisions.
Granted, America's existing welfare programs are shot through with capricious requirements, random income cutoffs, and a whole mess of despiriting bureaucracy that lower-income Americans have to navigate. As Yang himself put it: "Our welfare programs are designed to be difficult." Replacing that maze with a simple, monthly, no-strings-attached check would arguably leave a lot of people better off, even if some of them would have to give up some of their existing benefits."
https://theweek.com/articles/858097/andrew-yangs-ubi-problem
I agree it would be more efficient and you could cut the bureaucracy.
Only if idiots like Bernie are in charge.
WTF does this have to do with anything?
Do you think there is a difference between privately controlled prisons and Government controlled prisons?
For-Profit Prisons creates an incentive to lock people up.
It's immoral business practices
Would it be 'immoral' if the Judge got a kick-back for everyone he sent to Prison? Or maybe he's just given free Stock in the Corporation?
For-Profit Prisons creates an incentive to lock people up.
For-Profit Prisons creates an incentive to lock people up.
It's immoral business practices
Would it be 'immoral' if the Judge got a kick-back for everyone he sent to Prison? Or maybe he's just given free Stock in the Corporation?
Or a seat on the board of directors
How do they do that? Are they sending out private police forces to find perps? I doubt you are smart enough to see how stupid that sounds.