21 y.o. black tells truth about black failure. IT'S IQ, NOT RACISM

Corazón said:
Yet there are obviously differences in IQ nonetheless. Look at the Chinese or the Southern Indians. 45% of the top 64 chess grandmasters are Jewish, why is that?
Click to expand...

early childhood nutrition and education

it explains every fucking bit of that racist
 
domer76 said:
States don't have rights, moron. People do.
Click to expand...

Actually, both do:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
 
evince said:
early childhood nutrition and education

it explains every fucking bit of that racist
Click to expand...
The truth is not racist, I believe much of that can be explained by them all being close knit societies that don't inter-marry much and consequently dilute their genes. Oh and you proved your racist credentials by calling Melania Trump Russian and laughing at her English, fucking racist. She speaks five languages, you can hardly speak one.
 
domer76 said:
You're an idiot. The Constitutional founders were federalists, you fucking moron. Advocates of a stronger federal government, including Washington. Know who he was, cretin? They saw the failure of "states' rights" in the piece of shit Articles of Confederation. The epitome of state's rights.

Stupid fuck.
Click to expand...

If the founding fathers opposed states rights, why did they put the tenth amendment in the constitution.? And why did they specify that only the states can amend the FEDERAL constitution.? THINK, hater.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
If the founding fathers opposed states rights, why did they put the tenth amendment in the constitution.? And why did they specify that only the states can amend the FEDERAL constitution.? THINK, hater.
Click to expand...

The 10th Amendment adds nothing, moron. It was an appeasement to the anti-Federalists. Nothing more. In US vs Darby Lumber, it says it best:

"The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered. There is nothing in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than declaratory of the relationship between the national and state governments as it had been established by the Constitution before the amendment or that its purpose was other than to allay fears that the new national government might seek to exercise powers not granted, and that the states might not be able to exercise fully their reserved powers."
 
Right said:
Actually, both do:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Click to expand...

Where do you find the word "rights" in that quote?
 
domer76 said:
No "oops", idiot. From your very citation:

"The Federalists were also aware that that the problems of the country in the 1780s stemmed from the weaknesses of the central government created by the Articles of Confederation."

The Federalists were for a STRONGER federal government because they saw how a weak one led to massive problems.
Click to expand...

Oh, it's most definitely an oops, because what you wrote was written in the context of TDAK's post, here:

Text Drivers are Killers said:
All the Founding Fathers believed in states rights. They would be appalled at america today, where the feds run everything.. The constitution was written to limit the federal govt, but it hasn't worked. The feds just ignore it and do as they please.
Click to expand...

Nice try at moving the goal posts though, lol
 
Right said:
Definition of power
1b : legal or official authority, capacity, or right

m-w.com
Click to expand...

Fail.

Find the words in the 10th Amendment that says 'right'. It doesn't, idiot. You search for things that aren't there. Typical for morons like you.

The 10th adds nothing and is no more than an appeasement.

You are such a mental weakling.
 
Right said:
Oh, it's most definitely an oops, because what you wrote was written in the context of TDAK's post, here:



Nice try at moving the goal posts though, lol
Click to expand...

Hilarious! You are basing your opinion on possibly (other than you), the biggest fucktard of the forum? REALLY? Priceless.

Much like you, that poor fuck doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. He doesn't know what the Founding Fathers "would be" anything.

What IS fact, is that the Founders organized a Constitutional Convention because the Articles of Confederation was a failure. You know, that whole notion of a bunch of loose, independent dates running around. They intended for a stronger central government to hold the nation together. There were differences in the degree of that. But guess what, stupid fuck? The Hamiltonians won!
 
domer76 said:
What IS fact, is that the Founders organized a Constitutional Convention because the Articles of Confederation was a failure. You know, that whole notion of a bunch of loose, independent dates running around. They intended for a stronger central government to hold the nation together.
Click to expand...

NONONO. The founding fathers did NOT want a strong federal govt and the articles of confederation prove it. The fact that they started with the super weak fed govt of the Articles shows that that is where their sympathies lay. Then they realized they had gone too far and wrote the constitution giving the feds more power but still not very much.

If the FF opposed states rights, they would have never written the tenth amendment. THINK.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
And all the evidence says blacks are very mentally inferior. Sorry you can't think or face facts.
Click to expand...

Your robes are ready.

Miss-Ruth-High-Res-9.jpg
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
NONONO. The founding fathers did NOT want a strong federal govt and the articles of confederation prove it. The fact that they started with the super weak fed govt of the Articles shows that that is where their sympathies lay. Then they realized they had gone too far and wrote the constitution giving the feds more power but still not very much.

If the FF opposed states rights, they would have never written the tenth amendment. THINK.
Click to expand...

You fucking idiot, they recognized what a huge failure that the weak central government that the Articles provided. The nation was falling apart because of it.

The 10th was the 'appendix' of the BofR. Appeasement and nothing else. Give them a bone. lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top