2nd Amendment Conversation from the Defund thread

Is reading comprehension not a right-wing forte?

My state has a constitution too.

Article I, Section 21 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution states: "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."

So, what does the legislature have to say about that? It looks clearly defined, no?
 
and you have lousy reading comprehension, combined with an innate refusal to study history
You merely claiming that is an ad hominem not a valid argument.

Your lousy reading comprehension is apparent by your refusing to rebute this actual State law and legal equivalent in any given and several State of our Union:
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
My state has a constitution too.

Article I, Section 21 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution states: "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."

So, what does the legislature have to say about that? It looks clearly defined, no?
Why do we have security problems in our free States?

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
You merely claiming that is an ad hominem not a valid argument.

Your lousy reading comprehension is apparent by your refusing to rebute this actual State law and legal equivalent in any given and several State of our Union:

so all of your arguments are invalid ad hominems.................good to know.

RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE and SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is all anyone needs to know
 
every piece of historical documentation refers to the militia as able bodied private citizens. there are also numerous pieces of historical documentation that states clearly that the federal government has absolutely zero power or authority over the arms of the people.

bear-arms.jpg
 
so all of your arguments are invalid ad hominems.................good to know.

RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE and SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is all anyone needs to know
Your ignorance is showing, like usual.

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
 
Politicians like Biden who allow illegals into this country, and judges like this Supreme Court nominee who are soft on crime. In other words...DEMOCRATS. That's why.
I agree to disagree. Right-wingers don't understand that being "hard on crime" IS socialism on a national or international basis.
 
I agree to disagree. Right-wingers don't understand that being "hard on crime" IS socialism on a national or international basis.

So we should let sexual perverts who have child porn on their computers run free? I agree to disagree...
 
Simple question. Do you think "we the people" should be disarmed?

No. I believe our elected representatives should do the job they get paid to do.

What is their job concerning the 2nd. Amendment?

There are thousands of gun clubs around this country. They are organized.

Is reading comprehension not a right-wing forte?

^Another perfect example of why one cannot debate a dishonest leftist dumbass. :palm:
 
I agree to disagree. Right-wingers don't understand that being "hard on crime" IS socialism on a national or international basis.

WRONG. But then, you are an uneducated, boorish, low IQ dumbass on steroids whose arguments are tantamount to "because you say so." :palm:

dumb
adjective
\ ˈdəm \
1a: lacking intelligence : STUPID
b: showing a lack of intelligence
c: requiring no intelligence
d: not having the capability to process data
 
Back
Top