70% Accept Same Sex Marriage, even Republicans

Marriage is a holy union between a man and a woman, and it compliments God's command to "be fruitful and multiply". Marriage, as we know it in an Earthly sense, also mirrors a Christian's spiritual relationship with Jesus. IOW, it mirrors the spiritual marriage between Jesus Christ and The Church.


In a secular frame of mind, marriage is a union between a man and a woman, IOW, a union in which procreation in principle is possible. This possibility of reproduction (being fruitful) is what gives marriage its meaning. Without that, we are only left with a close fellowship between two people.

Gays, in this manner, bastardize marriage via their feeble attempt to make their relationship into a sexual one, even though reproduction is not possible (even in principle) since a butthole is not a vagina (and a vagina is not a penis). A "gay marriage", while not platonic in the minds of the two participants, is ultimately no different in result than a platonic relationship between two people.

There is absolutely zero possibility for reproduction in a "gay marriage", not even in principle. This renders the whole notion of "gay marriage" to be completely and utterly meaningless, and in no way is it the same thing as a marriage (in which reproduction is possible, even if that possibility only be in principle).

One of the most perverted obscene comments ever on the forum
 
I need you to provide factual citations and links to prove who defined marriage. thank you
I'm not interested in a holy link war.

Are you not up for a philosophical discussion about marriage?


Like I said, if one removes the in principle possibility to procreate, then one has removed the whole essence of marriage. IOW, any "marriage" that attempts to mirror marriage is no different in result than having a platonic relationship with someone.

Two men bastardizing marriage via butthole sex is not marriage, as there is absolutely zero possibility to reproduce via butthole sex, not even in principle.
 
I'm not interested in a holy link war.
that's good. I'm agnostic so I have a feeling I wouldn't come close to winning.

Are you not up for a philosophical discussion about marriage?
I could give it a try, but as an agnostic Libertarian, i'm pretty much solidly in the camp of government shouldn't be involved in the marriage business anyway. the 'license' seems merely just a way for them to steal more of peoples money


Like I said, if one removes the in principle possibility to procreate, then one has removed the whole essence of marriage. IOW, any "marriage" that attempts to mirror marriage is no different in result than having a platonic relationship with someone.

Two men bastardizing marriage via butthole sex is not marriage, as there is absolutely zero possibility to reproduce via butthole sex, not even in principle.

I can understand the religious aspect of seeing marriage in that regard, but being a limited government person, I see marriage as nothing more than a contract between two people.
 
I'm not interested in a holy link war.

Are you not up for a philosophical discussion about marriage?


Like I said, if one removes the in principle possibility to procreate, then one has removed the whole essence of marriage. IOW, any "marriage" that attempts to mirror marriage is no different in result than having a platonic relationship with someone.

Two men bastardizing marriage via butthole sex is not marriage, as there is absolutely zero possibility to reproduce via butthole sex, not even in principle.

People have been telling you you're stupid and a more on literally all your life it's time you started believing them
 
People being gay was never a worry for me much. I have gay friends and relatives and the shit fits people make over gays never made sense. I literally realized my uncle was gay one day and said, oh, he must be gay. The End.

Yeah I know when I was growing up I had an aunt that lived with another woman and it never clicked on me till years later that hey she's lesbian.
 
I'm not interested in a holy link war.

Are you not up for a philosophical discussion about marriage?


Like I said, if one removes the in principle possibility to procreate, then one has removed the whole essence of marriage. IOW, any "marriage" that attempts to mirror marriage is no different in result than having a platonic relationship with someone.

Two men bastardizing marriage via butthole sex is not marriage, as there is absolutely zero possibility to reproduce via butthole sex, not even in principle.

Your assumption that homosexuals all do butthole sex is incorrect you have this deep hearted need to be an inbred opioid addicted delusional moron
 
Why get married?

there are a multitude of personal dynamics in many relationships.......some spouses put another through school, some raise kids, some make more than others while the other does domestic jobs............that 'marriage' or contract is utilized to hopefully prevent one person from using another to their advantage, then throwing the other away when their usefulness has ended
 
there are a multitude of personal dynamics in many relationships.......some spouses put another through school, some raise kids, some make more than others while the other does domestic jobs............that 'marriage' or contract is utilized to hopefully prevent one person from using another to their advantage, then throwing the other away when their usefulness has ended
That doesn't sound any different than entering into a contract with an employer. There doesn't seem to be anything special about marriage under this view... Why call it marriage as opposed to calling it a contract??
 
Back
Top