I don't see why it should be easy to explain why I think he's a bad President.
I didn't ask you to explain why Trump was a bad President.
That's true. You said it should be easy for me to explain why he wasn't the best U.S. President ever. We're miles apart in viewpoint. Since my view is so far from yours, I decided to bring it back to my own to some extent.
You're not a fan of Trump, so you must have a reason that he wasn't the best President EV-AH! After all, if he were the best President EV-AH!, you'd be a fan, right?
Sure. But like I said, our viewpoints are miles apart. I think he's one of the worst. Perhaps not -the- worst, but certainly in the running. The only thing I was happy about is that he didn't finance any new war while he was President, as far as I know. And he briefly considered having RFK Jr. as his "Vaccine Czar". Apparently, Big Pharma then gave him some money and he let go of that idea.
I presume that your explanation will center around the official duties of the Presidency, because if Trump is the best President EV-AH! then you'd be a fan and would vote for him for President, yes? So, the floor is yours.
I'm not even sure what you mean by "official duties". Care to elaborate?
There is one snippet of one of his speeches that will probably stay with me forever:
**
When do we beat Mexico at the border? They’re laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they are beating us economically. They are not our friend, believe me. But they’re killing us economically.
The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everybody else’s problems.
Thank you. It’s true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
**
Source:
Here’s Donald Trump’s Presidential Announcement Speech | Time
Color me disappointed.
Presumably because it wasn't one of his official duties I imagine.
That was a campaign speech.
It was, yes.
It was also entirely accurate.
No, it wasn't. The fact that you think it was says volumes about certain viewpoints you hold.
If you can't figure it out, I think this conversation is coming to a close.
Having a father who was born and raised in Mexico and being Canadian-Mexican myself, those lines certainly weren't very endearing.
You should pay attention next time and not allow yourself to become instantly triggered over certain words. Gullible people, such as you, allow leftists to rule your world and control your communication. When they order you to become irrationally triggered at hearing certain words, you become part of the problem.
You heard the word "Mexican" and decided to OBEY your instructions to no permit that word to be spoken.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I guess I have to spell out my objection. More than anything, it's these lines:
"They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists."
Now, imagine if some Canadian Prime Minister were to say that of Americans going to work in Canada. As an American, would you not only say that that would be an innacurate statement, but also be strongly offended?
You are irrational and your comments end up being totally stupid.
I suppose that's the type of rhetoric that fits right in with Trump fans. I find it ironic that you seem to have more sympathy for Gazans then the people who are just south of your border. Have you ever heard of a film called "Under the Same Moon"? Here's a trailer:
I also finished listening to the audio version of this book, quite good:
Love Across Borders: Passports, Papers, and Romance in a Divided World | goodreads.com
I find the lines particularly ironic given the accusation that he himself violently raped a 13 year old girl:
Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It? | Huffington Post
... and in your mind, an accusation is as good as a conviction, right?
No, but in this case I do believe the accusation is true.
That being said, I have to admit that he might still be better than Biden.
Let's see ... I can list off pages of substantive reasons that Biden has greatly harmed the US in the performance of his official duties
I imagine we could probably agree on some of those, certainly if you weren't a fan of the vaccine mandates, for one.
I recently heard someone say that when Trump was President, the U.S. bankroll any major war and put effort into getting ones it was already in.
Would you consider rewriting this in English?
The English was fine, but I missed some rather important words, I think I was in a rush to finish the post. It should have read (bolded words/letters added):
I recently heard someone say that when Trump was President, the U.S.
didn't bankroll any major war
s and put effort into getting
out of the wars that the U.S. was already in.