Canceled.2014.2
Canceled
filmmakers......
As usual, fell off the reality train and hit your head.
filmmakers......
No, his avatar is a child, and they are usually teachable. You cannot teach a man who thinks he knows everything. And if you think your better than you really are....your as good as your ever going to get.
what a petty annoying little smart ass you are - and have always been. Is your avatar a self portrait?
No, his avatar is a child, and they are usually teachable. You cannot teach a man who thinks he knows everything. And if you think your better than you really are....your as good as your ever going to get.
As usual, fell off the reality train and hit your head.
no.....and neither is yours.....
no.....and neither is yours.....
if we can blame film makers for Benghazi isn't it reasonable to treat the Iraq war equally?......
My point exactly.....maineman and obviously you, think nothing of holding Bush responsible for 9/11 but refuse to hold Obama or Hillary responsible for Benghazi...
But I'll defend Bush for this simple fact, the 9/11 terrorists were in country before Bush became President...and thus set the stage for the attack.....
.who gets the 'blame for that'?......
The Great Clinton ?...Mr. SuperSpy Clark ?....certainly not Bush, who wasn't even there yet.....
Circumstances in Benghazi are quite different......SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...thats wtf her job required.....
and Bush lied about the absolute certainty of Saddam's WMD's and he and his team falsely implied a pre-9/11 connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda that never happened. Those two falsehoods, when conflated, provided the sense of urgency and fear that Bush needed to cow Americans into supporting a war against Iraq that had abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING to do with the folks that had attacked us, all the while, he, by his own admission, had lost interest in OBL. I certainly DO blame Bush for all our dead in Iraq. And I am upset with the current president for not getting out of Afghanistan.
Wrong again shit-for-brains. He believed the same intelligence Clinton did. But you're too dishonest and partisan to acknowledge the truth.
Aren't you the same dimwitted dunce who claimed that had we followed the correct decisions of our allies and abandoned our mission in Benghazi we were "surrender monkeys?"
It's a fascinating thing when debating dishonest hyper partisan assholes like you; you can't remember the last dishonest moronic taking point you posted and desperately try to engage in a never ending circle of stupidity.
Yes shit-for-brains; you really are THAT dishonest and THAT stupid.
What he "believed" is irrelevant. He didn't state his belief, he stated, as a statement of fact, that there was absolute certainty about Saddam's WMD stockpiles when he knew full well that uncertainty did exist even within his own intelligence agencies. That made it a lie.
His direct quotes about WMD's were legion, but on at least one occasion, he stated, "THERE IS NO DOUBT...." when referring to the existence of Saddam's stockpiles. That made it a lie, because there was, in fact, doubt, uncertainly, caveats, qualifiers concerning that very subject within his own intelligence services.
If he had said, "I personally have no doubt" or "there is little doubt" that would not have been a lie. Words have meanings and I certainly expect my president to use them with accuracy and precision.... don't YOU?
I think you will find that only AL Gore made a statement that stated absolute certainty about Saddam's stockpiles of WMD's and he made that AFTER he left office. Bush was our commander-in-chief when he lied about it.And once again shit-for-brains; he was NOT alone in such assertions. But again, I am trying to have a debate with a dishonest dunce invested in hyper partisan talking points.