A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

maineman said:
"blame"? I don't think that word is appropriate when discussing the unfortunate deaths of Americans. Who do I blame? I blame the terrorists who killed them. My question is: WHY THE FUCK DON'T YOU?????
Click to expand...

They requested help repeatedly and were denied and the Senate Committee said it could have been prevented. Hillary is the boss. Suck on it, bootlicker.
 
NOVA said:
Really?.....you have no problem with 'blaming' Bush for 9/11 and US troops kia in Iraq....do you 'blame' Obama for the his 75% of the total kia in Afghanistan ?

Those Americans killed in Benghazi were under the direct protection of Hillary and her State Department...
SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible for at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...
that wtf her job required.....
Click to expand...
Bush can be legitimately blame for Iraq. Invading the wrong country was a mistake a wide awake eighth grader would have avoided. Not so with the cokehead in chief who lid about WMD to do it.
 
Last edited:
1966stang said:
Bush can be legitimately blame for Iraq. Invading the wrong country was a mistake a ice awake eighth grader would have avoided. Not so with the cokehead in chief who lid about WMD to do it.
Click to expand...

Bush is gone. Obama is the president. Deranged Cockroach. Grow up and take responsibility, lying filthy asslicker.
 
christiefan915 said:
This is an excerpt from a much longer article. It's guaranteed to annoy the Hillary haters, who probably won't even read it in full before going into attack mode.

"Fifteen months after Mr. Stevens’s death, the question of responsibility remains a searing issue in Washington, framed by two contradictory story lines.

One has it that the video, which was posted on YouTube, inspired spontaneous street protests that got out of hand. This version, based on early intelligence reports, was initially offered publicly by Susan E. Rice, who is now Mr. Obama’s national security adviser.

The other, favored by Republicans, holds that Mr. Stevens died in a carefully planned assault by Al Qaeda to mark the anniversary of its strike on the United States 11 years before. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of covering up evidence of Al Qaeda’s role to avoid undermining the president’s claim that the group has been decimated, in part because of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs...

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

(Continued)

http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/#/?chapt=0
Click to expand...
Why would this annoy us? Anyone who isn't a complete kneepad wearing whore knows that publication is full of shit. Stop kissing Obama's ass, Christiekins, no one's buying your bullshit.
 
NOVA said:
You wanna discuss ?

again.....

"The security of our embassy's are the DIRECT responsibility of the State Dept....Hillary was the head of that State Dept....

Blame ?....If not her.....WHO?

Where the fuck does the 'buck stop' in this administration....the lowest aide...the file clerk...or is it still at GW's desk ?"
Click to expand...

Show me some outrage over this. The security of Americans is the direct responsibility of the POTUS... bush was the potus... Blame?

I sure as hell didn't see any repubs holding his feet to the fire when almost 3,000 Americans died on 9/11, it was ALL about the evil Muslims.

CIA_Memo.JPG
 
1966stang said:
Bush can be legitimately blame for Iraq. Invading the wrong country was a mistake a ice awake eighth grader would have avoided. Not so with the cokehead in chief who lid about WMD to do it.
Click to expand...


The wrong country ?....the wrong country for what ?......every intelligence group in the western world believed Saddam had WMD....wrongly, but that is what
was believed prior to the war.....the infamous quotes from Democrats going back to the Clinton administration prove that beyond any doubt....
Learn some history idiot....the truth won't hurt you.
Quotes from Clinton himself, Hillary, Albright, several Dem. Senators, Kerry, Al Gore, etc.....all talked about Saddams WMD.

In 1998, the United States Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the "Iraq Liberation Act".

The act made it official U.S. policy to "support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein
although it also made clear that "nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces."
even though Clinton had been using US aircraft to launch missiles and bomb Iraqi positions for years.....Clinton double speak, I guess.....

Before the election in 2000...
The Republican Party's campaign platform called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act and removal of Saddam Hussein....
Then came the War Resolution....so the war was no surprise and approved by Congress before action was taken.....

History stang....facts.
 
christiefan915 said:
Show me some outrage over this. The security of Americans is the direct responsibility of the POTUS... bush was the potus... Blame?

I sure as hell didn't see any repubs holding his feet to the fire when almost 3,000 Americans died on 9/11, it was ALL about the evil Muslims.

CIA_Memo.JPG
Click to expand...

My point exactly.....maineman and obviously you, think nothing of holding Bush responsible for 9/11 but refuse to hold Obama or Hillary responsible for Benghazi...

But I'll defend Bush for this simple fact, the 9/11 terrorists were in country before Bush became President...and thus set the stage for the attack.....
.who gets the 'blame for that'?......

The Great Clinton ?...Mr. SuperSpy Clark ?....certainly not Bush, who wasn't even there yet.....

Circumstances in Benghazi are quite different......SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...thats wtf her job required.....
 
NOVA said:
Really?.....you have no problem with 'blaming' Bush for 9/11 and US troops kia in Iraq....do you 'blame' Obama for the his 75% of the total kia in Afghanistan ?

Those Americans killed in Benghazi were under the direct protection of Hillary and her State Department...
SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible for at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...
that wtf her job required.....
Click to expand...

who do YOU blame for 9/11? Bush, or OBL?
 
NOVA said:
My point exactly.....maineman and obviously you, think nothing of holding Bush responsible for 9/11 but refuse to hold Obama or Hillary responsible for Benghazi...

But I'll defend Bush for this simple fact, the 9/11 terrorists were in country before Bush became President...and thus set the stage for the attack.....
.who gets the 'blame for that'?......

The Great Clinton ?...Mr. SuperSpy Clark ?....certainly not Bush, who wasn't even there yet.....

Circumstances in Benghazi are quite different......SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...thats wtf her job required.....
Click to expand...

and all of the 9/11 hijackers entered this country under totally legal circumstances. We had no reason to stop any of them from entering. Once they got here, they DID start learning how to fly jet airliners and they WERE quite specific that they really didn't care to ever learn how to LAND them... and Bush's FBI team DID become aware of that fact... and those FBI agents DID write urgent memos to their bosses telling them about this strange and troubling anomaly... (kinda like the ambassador writing to request more security)... but nobody in Team Bush thought to do ANYTHING about those reports, because, up until 9/12, Team Bush thought that islamic terrorism was so "last century" and nowhere NEAR as important as Star Wars.... Bush gets a free pass for 3K dead, and Hillary is totally castigated for 4. That makes plenty of sense.
 
NOVA said:
My point exactly.....maineman and obviously you, think nothing of holding Bush responsible for 9/11 but refuse to hold Obama or Hillary responsible for Benghazi...

But I'll defend Bush for this simple fact, the 9/11 terrorists were in country before Bush became President...and thus set the stage for the attack.....
.who gets the 'blame for that'?......

The Great Clinton ?...Mr. SuperSpy Clark ?....certainly not Bush, who wasn't even there yet.....

Circumstances in Benghazi are quite different......SHE KNEW security was far from adequate...
SHE KNEW the danger was very high from the previous attacks just in the last few months before that attack
She didn't lift a finger to attempt a rescue....even if a rescue would have been too late, it should have been attempted....even Carter tried in Iran...a failed attempt is better than no attempt....
The buck stops with her.....she didn't fire the bullets or fire the APG,s....she is responsible at least for incompetence in providing adequate security and lack of a rescue effort...thats wtf her job required.....
Click to expand...

Look up Bojinka plot. Everybody knew terrorists were in the country before bush so why didn't he do something about it? During the Clinton admin three of the terrorists got life sentences and one was cooperating with our government. It was no secret that more attacks were in the works. I suppose your Messiah bush was too busy mountain biking and cutting brush to give it more than passing notice, though.
 
and Bush lied about the absolute certainty of Saddam's WMD's and he and his team falsely implied a pre-9/11 connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda that never happened. Those two falsehoods, when conflated, provided the sense of urgency and fear that Bush needed to cow Americans into supporting a war against Iraq that had abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING to do with the folks that had attacked us, all the while, he, by his own admission, had lost interest in OBL. I certainly DO blame Bush for all our dead in Iraq. And I am upset with the current president for not getting out of Afghanistan.
 
maineman said:
and Bush lied about the absolute certainty of Saddam's WMD's and he and his team falsely implied a pre-9/11 connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda that never happened. Those two falsehoods, when conflated, provided the sense of urgency and fear that Bush needed to cow Americans into supporting a war against Iraq that had abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING to do with the folks that had attacked us, all the while, he, by his own admission, had lost interest in OBL. I certainly DO blame Bush for all our dead in Iraq. And I am upset with the current president for not getting out of Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

I'm upset with him about A'stan too, among other things. But I'm even more upset with the egregious excuses these clowns make to justify bush's actions and their continued bleating that Hillary herself was responsible for the four deaths in Benghazi.

bush = 9/11 = 3,000 deaths <yawn; it's all the Muzzies' fault>

Hillary = Benghazi = 4 deaths <all hell breaks loose; no terrorist gets blamed>
 
Why don't you go away and come back when you have ANYTHING of substance to add... your insults are boring and seem more and more like spam.

::yawn::
 
christiefan915 said:
Show me some outrage over this. The security of Americans is the direct responsibility of the POTUS... bush was the potus... Blame?

I sure as hell didn't see any repubs holding his feet to the fire when almost 3,000 Americans died on 9/11, it was ALL about the evil Muslims.
Click to expand...

yeah, I remember it well.....Bush said "somebody saw a movie"......
 
maineman said:
what a petty annoying little smart ass you are - and have always been. Is your avatar a self portrait?
Click to expand...

No, his avatar is a child, and they are usually teachable. You cannot teach a man who thinks he knows everything. And if you think your better than you really are....your as good as your ever going to get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top