I made no mention of a competition. Go back and reread the thread and you can confirm that the first mention of a "competition" in this thread was in post #15 by you. See? If you can develop this habit of just rereading when you get confused, you can reduce the number of times you embarrass yourself this way. Good luck!
A different Supreme Court.
- Thread starter Mina
- Start date
lying sack of shit. in post #1 you mentioned Republicans have won it once. if it wasn't a competition in your mind, they couldn't of won or lost retard
Mina_The_Retard_in_post_#1 said:
Dear retard. your best best is to grab a dictionary - and start learning single letter words I, A, and so forth
then you can advance to 2 letter words
maybe one day, you can finally learn the meaning of three letter words - like won - the past tense of win
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/win
As you're now aware, you brought up the concept of a competition. Now that you understand how you screwed up, you can try to do better in the future. Good luck!
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
checked RealClearPolitics lately?
Congressional Job Approval
RCP Average 3/1 - 5/3 -- 24.2 66.0 -41.8
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html
I understand you'd like to suggest that you read my mind and that's what led you to introduce the "competition" into this thread. But that doesn't change the fact you were the one who introduced it. Learn from your error and do better in the future. I know critical thinking can be hard for those who are working with lower IQ's, but I'm convince that if you just take the time to reread, even people like you can cut down on the number of times you humiliate yourself. I'll be pulling for you.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Thank you, Donald Trump.....
California did not "override" my state of New Jersey. We were able to see the clod, Trump, for the loser he is...and voted for Biden overwhelmingly.
If you want to think the other 49 states voted for your moron, do it. We all enjoy a laugh.
By the way, California is a land mass...just as every other state is a land mass. Land masses do not vote. The people living in those land masses do...and every vote should matter.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
every vote does matter......they determine which candidate gets each state's electoral votes....electoral votes are calculated two per state plus one for every selected number of people in the state......its how the system works......for some reason, despite it being our system for 250 years, demmycrats still don't understand it.......
How could you win if it wasn't a competition? You said no one could win unless there was a competition. Now you are saying you could win but it was not a competition.
dumbest man in any room he walks in right here.
poor poor Richard. dumb as can be.
You presented us with a false claim when you said the majority of the US lives in "a handful of urban areas on the two coasts." A majority is more than 50%. I merely pointed out that the majority does not live in urban areas on the coast since the US has over 330 million people and only about 100 million live in large urban areas within 350 miles of the 2 coasts. (No one would consider Buffalo a coastal city but I did include Atlanta as coastal.) Your entire premise is based on a faulty premise since your initial claim is clearly false. It seems it is you that is attempting to use the McNamara fallacy while at the same time using bad data.
The US House representation is based on population so there would be no change with the House. 435 of the electoral college is based on representation in the House. Changing to a popular vote wouldn't suddenly make the coasts dominate over other land areas. It would only eliminate a quirk where the majority vote getter isn't the winner. With the current scheme if every state that touches the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean vote for one candidate the other candidate can not win even if they win every other state. So the coasts already do what you say you don't want them able to do.
https://www.270towin.com/
As you now realize, the question was "competition" -- a word you introduced to the thread. Try harder and you'll make fewer such mistakes in the future. Good luck.
no child - you introduced it talking about winning things. you can't win if you don't compete little boy
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Just take the L and try harder in the future. Perhaps there's some scrap of dignity you can still salvage.
sorry tardo - you lost in the first post when you foolishly pretended to win something that isn't a competition
dumbest man in any room he walks in right here.
poor poor Richard. dumb as can be.
Dumbest man in any room, he walks in right here.
Sentences should always start with a capital letter. A comma should be used when starting a sentence with a subordinate clause.
Since a person can't walk into a website, did you intend this to be a metaphor? "Right here" is awkward and redundant.
Poor poor Richard, dumb as can be.
You failed to capitalize first word in a sentence again. Not a complete sentence since there is no verb. Replace the period with a comma to tie the two phrases together. Is this failure to use grammar correctly while calling someone else "dumb" an attempt at irony or was it unintentional?
While your attempt to communicate was somewhat successful, you undermined your message by making so many grammatical mistakes.
In case all that went over your head, I did just call you "stupid."
shit stain is wasting time on caps concerns.
poor, poor Richard the poor