A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts ‘Consensus’ Climate Science

archives said:
It's as easy as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow, and I fully understanding banning those that expose your faulty arguememts, that's why those that think the way you do are called deniers
Click to expand...

Not once have you ever attempted to discuss the science, so what's the point? I asked for your opinion on post 91 and got nothing. so again, what is the point?
 
archives said:
Discuss the latest

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...s-climate-is-warming-and-humans-are-the-cause
https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

Next
Click to expand...
Global temperatures are returning to pre-El Nino levels, discuss that!

HadCRUT4 global temperature for September 2017 is 0.56 deg C — which is the same as the September temps in 2005 (0.57), 2009 (0.56), 2012 (0.55), and 2013 (0.54).

Source: Met Office, HadCrut4



https://principia-scientific.org/global-temperatures-continue-to-drop-back-to-pre-el-nino-levels/
9bbfa43cd9566636993a7e0c17e889d3.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
archives said:
Discuss the latest

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...s-climate-is-warming-and-humans-are-the-cause
https://science2017.globalchange.gov/

Next
Click to expand...

Over the past two millenia, average Northern Hemisphere temperatures have exceeded natural variability (defined as two standard deviations from the pre-1865 mean) at least hi three times:

1) the peak of the Medieval Warm Period
2) the nadir of the Little Ice Age and
3) since 1998.

Human activity couldn't have been the cause of the first two deviations. Modern warming only exceeds pre-industrial natural variability by a maximum of 0.216°C as shown in the graph.

0f58869d3c09e6c583fb8e6afe4dd0c7.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Prof. Richard Lindzen on the corruption of climate science. He reminds everybody that when government gets involved then politics will inevitably become part of the message.


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Corazón said:
Prof. Riatalk
Click to expand...


Climate Contrarian Gets Fact-Checked by MIT Colleagues in Open Letter to Trump
'This is not a view shared by us'

"The MIT staff addressed specific inaccuracies in Lindzen's letter, including his assertion that "carbon dioxide is not a pollutant."

"The risks to the Earth system associated with increasing levels of carbon dioxide are almost universally agreed by climate scientists to be real ones," they wrote. "These include, but are not limited to, sea level rise, ocean acidification, and increases in extreme flooding and droughts, all with serious consequences for mankind."


Richard Lindzen testifies at a House Science Committee hearing on global climate change on Nov 17, 2010. Credit: CSPAN
Lindzen has spent years downplaying the significance of man-made climate change through his published research, testimony in lawsuits and appearances before Congress. He has compared "global warming believers" to a "cult," and called the most recent assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world's leading climate science body, "a political document." He served as a meteorology professor from 1983 to 2013. He is now a distinguished senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based conservative think tank.

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...l-scientists-richard-lindzen-mit-donald-trump
 
Freeman Dyson contemporary of both Einstein and Oppenheimer, and without a shadow of a doubt the greatest living physicist, answers his critics. As Krauthammer says, Dyson has more intelligence in his pinkie than the whole of the EPA combined.


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
How many times have you heard scientific illiterates parrot the same old nonsense? The IPCC outlines four RCP scenarios (see post 91), so which of those do these scientists agree with? They never ask that question which then allows the alarmists to assume that they all mean RCP 8.5 when I doubt that very many do. It highlights exceedingly well the fallacy of equivocation, what's that you say? Well watch the video and find out.


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
The National Climate Assessment Report is truly an embarrassment, full of bullshit stats, half truths, contradictions and, in some cases, outright lies.

Heller makes his frustration with government funded climate science clear: “Government funded climate science is the biggest fraud in history.”


http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.t9VYNEnr.dpbs

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Corazon seems to be on a serious climate change denier wonk bent....pity they can't directly toe to toe hold their own with valid peer reviewed research that just faults their denial. Oh, and to date I have yet to hear the rationale behind the insanity of denying the effect of a century plus global deforestation, urbanization and industrial pollutants on the natural climate change of the earth.

And the beat goes on.
 
What does the chronology of the posts have to say on the matter? I refer you to the quote by the late great Robert Oppenheimer.


There must be no barriers to freedom of inquiry … There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors.
 
Last edited:
Do you ever see polar bears on the Great Barrier Reef? That's because Australian coalminers killed them all off!

Record cold is just 'weather', whilst any warm event, drought, flood, storm, wind or fire is without doubt linked to global warming.

https://twitter.com/x/status/929224013083238401


Dr. Ryan Maue has been tracking the forecasts for the Northeast, and the result is…ah, chilling. Maue says the “polar vortex” is responsible for the exceptionally cold and dry air invading the Northeast USA.

He goes on to say that the all time record for New York City of 22°F forecast by morning in NYC would be coldest, earliest temperature on record.

The previous earliest record of reaching 22°F was Nov 13, 1873. The 21°F expected for NYC would be the coldest in 144 years. Further up Long Island, temperatures are expected in the teens.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/11/11/144-year-earliest-cold-record-for-new-york-city-to-be-broken/

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top