A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts ‘Consensus’ Climate Science

crowonapost said:
Crazy. It's like changing the aerosol spray from clorofluorcarbons made shit better for the upper atmosphere because science. SOOO Fuck you and shit.
Amirite?

According to you we NEED more Nuclear radiation from above ground nuclear tests. Amirite?

Just keeping it 'libertarian' and shit. I mean corporatist trust find baby like, YOU TWO can be a lottery winner from magic past.
Click to expand...

Can anyone interpret this in English?
 
Corazón said:
Maybe you pay attention to what James Lovelock, who first brought the world's attention to ozone depletion, has to say on climate change alarmism and general hysteria?

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/ozone_depletion_02

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/09...nd-why-he-changed-his-mind-on-climate-change/
Click to expand...

2 great examples, Ireland in 1970, the blog and Brexit.
Wow so intellectual, so on point.Except where it's not on any level.
That was pathetic, as a response.

I want to give you smart, but you are not,

As Trump states, sad.
 
crowonapost said:
2 great examples, Ireland in 1970, the blog and Brexit.
Wow so intellectual, so on point.Except where it's not on any level.
That was pathetic, as a response.

I want to give you smart, but you are not,

As Trump states, sad.
Click to expand...

Do you think that your enigmatic posts make you appear smarter?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
crowonapost said:
2 great examples, Ireland in 1970, the blog and Brexit.
Wow so intellectual, so on point.Except where it's not on any level.
That was pathetic, as a response.

I want to give you smart, but you are not,

As Trump states, sad.
Click to expand...
Try this then, if somebody as eminent as James Lovelock can change his mind shouldn't you at least wonder why? I guess that you think you're smarter than him and better informed, amirite?

http://torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel/wcm/04339e7a-d24f-400f-a871-b85198018d88

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Corazón said:
Try this then, if somebody as eminent as James Lovelock can change his mind shouldn't you at least wonder why? I guess that you think you're smarter than him and better informed, amirite?

http://torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel/wcm/04339e7a-d24f-400f-a871-b85198018d88

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There he goes again, throwing the names, like as I noted earlier, the other nine out of ten scientists wouldn't agree

Besides, if I read it right, he didn't throw out his entire prior views on climate change but rather they will pose a problem in the future more so than today

Regardless, dropping climate skeptic names is inane given so many more scientists disagree

Now next we'll get the personal crapola, book it
 
archives said:
There he goes again, throwing the names, like as I noted earlier, the other nine out of ten scientists wouldn't agree

Besides, if I read it right, he didn't throw out his entire prior views on climate change but rather they will pose a problem in the future more so than today

Regardless, dropping climate skeptic names is inane given so many more scientists disagree

Now next we'll get the personal crapola, book it
Click to expand...
No matey, you bring absolutely fuck all to the table so will be ignored in future.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Corazón said:
No matey, you bring absolutely fuck all to the table so will be ignored in future.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It's as easy as predicting the sun will come up tomorrow, and I fully understanding banning those that expose your faulty arguememts, that's why those that think the way you do are called deniers
 
This is how warmists deal with inconvenient truths:


8UvCa0R.png
 
RB 60 said:
Can anyone interpret this in English?
Click to expand...

crowonapost said:
For you, not so much. Try Arabic. It suits your fear.
Click to expand...

RB 60 said:
Fear of what?
Click to expand...

RB 60 said:
Asking for an explanation of gibberish is a fear?
Click to expand...

Micawber said:
Crow said you all are climate science denying libertarians and the ozone guy has no pertinence.
Click to expand...

lol Micawber, I was going to do a lengthy explanation but you succinctly made my point. thank you.
 
Corazón said:
Aloysious says that you're a fraud and a serial liar, can't help but agree.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Boy was that a relevant and cogent counter argument. One day people will write papers about that counter argument bullshit. Oh, and then use it for toilet paper. Small chunky detail...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top