Into the Night
Verified User
But you are unable to explain your statement about fraud? You could have explained yourself in the time you took to insult me.
Educate me, sir.
Is there anything fraudulent about this study? Yes or no.
RQAA
But you are unable to explain your statement about fraud? You could have explained yourself in the time you took to insult me.
Educate me, sir.
Is there anything fraudulent about this study? Yes or no.
It almost certainly is a complete fraud, so it carries no weight with me unless someone I trust who is an expert at these sorts of things gets the data, goes over everything, and tells me that it looks legit.
Bret and Heather would be fine.
Lie. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
If it said Fox News viewers are the most informed would you also say it is fraudulent unless somebody read it for you?
Oh, you poor man. Do NOT get sucked into that. All he and his troll sock, goat do, is make these statements, with no support, then when you ask them to prove it, like you just did, they give you babbling double talk and do anything except answer the question. Hawkeye10 and goat are troll sock brothers. Both do the same thing. Don't engage either, other than to flame them/him.
Don't like the results? Attack the election.
Don't like the results? Attack the study.
So transparent.
Zero for three, Hawrthorne Blowmehard.
Statistical math was not involved. Just a conclusion with no published unbiased raw data. The method of collecting it and the time of collecting it is likewise unpublished.Wrong! I pointed out the reason it was bad, among others. You come back with nonsense. It isn't the first statistical study I've panned for reasons related to the statistics involved.
They may have taken several years of statistics, but statistical math is not involved here.I think my best one was pointing out the bullshit studies used by radical Leftists in the Tucson Unified School District to claim their racist, hater, "Raza Studies" program was a success.
It was amazing in that case that the number of students per semester for five semesters never changed, nor did their racial make up...
That was an obvious major red flag right off. From there, things went down hill. Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne picked up on that via a reporter at the Arizona Republic I was feeding that stuff to and used it, in part, to get the program shutdown.
That's what taking several years of statistics and then applying them for decades does. The poll in this case is bullshit regardless of what you think or don't.
You don't have to prove what you do not allege, TA.
They are not alleging that FOX caused it...they are merely saying that people who watch FOX score worse. Maybe the point is that the people who actually watch FOX are just fucking morons...so they would score worse no matter what.
I just ignore your comments!
Because you are an idiot and pest!
Bulverism fallacy.
You have a problem with the truth- Don't YOU?
You don't have to prove what you do not allege, TA.
They are not alleging that FOX caused it...they are merely saying that people who watch FOX score worse. Maybe the point is that the people who actually watch FOX are just fucking morons...so they would score worse no matter what.
Again, causation and correlation. If a person chose multiple sources, and let's just say for argument few or none chose a single source, then there's no way to know which caused what.