A serious political question.

Stevie has some self-esteem issues which causes him to become JPP's most obnoxious Internet Tough Guy. He's also a perpetual victim where he justifies his obnoxiousness due to exaggerated perceived wrongs.

Says the fucking retard who invites people to fight him in from of the local police station...
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Well toodles, if Eagle Eye was offended, he could have said so. Instead, his response to me was sane, rational and with no hint of irritation. Only YOU are trying to score points with this trivial hissy fit of yours.

And why don't you give the Post # or link to the post were you gave a direct, in no uncertain terms answer? If you did and you can show the readers here, then I will address and apologize accordingly. If not, then all your bluffing won't fool the reading audience who will see you for the BS artist that you are. We're waiting.

But you and I both know



Again, I did address it. I addressed it by pointing out the stupidity of comparing Walker, who was running for State office, to Biden, who holds a national office. Dunce even went so far as to reinforce that point.

So, eat a steamy pile of shit. I don't care that you don't like my answer...

Again, you're full of it. You just keep blowing smoke, and take time and effort to do it. But giving the reading audience the Post # that displays in no uncertain terms what you claim is just beyond you? :rolleyes:

A simple search of this thread under your name shows numerous posts by you where you do any and everything BUT give a direct, in no uncertain terms answer to the OP.

And you never will, because you're just another run-of-the-mill sheet wearing MAGA troll...all noise and no substance. In short, you lie like a rug.

Your token candidate lost despite heavy gerry mandering and voter suppression tactics by the GOP. The videos of "butter won't melt in my mouth" defense and support by Georgian voters for Walker was hysterical. A pathetic joke...much like you here.

Say goodnight Gracie.
 
Says the fucking retard who invites people to fight him in from of the local police station...

Why are you afraid of police stations, Stevie? Are you wanted?

Being a fat dummy isn't crime in Texas, son. Maybe the law is different in Florida.
 
Walker IS a "local" politician. But FYI, local politicians make up the national gov't....you know, congressmen and senators. The OP question remains. Care to answer?

Walker is not a local politician. The race was for the US Senate.

And FYI, there are a lot of people who make a very good living staying at the city council level for decades. They'll never hold office above Mayor and they don't want to. There's a reason for that.

So, now that your fuckwittery has been exposed I ask a question...how can a district be represented in the House when the only viable candidates are pledged to Parties with National platforms?
 
Why are you afraid of police stations, Stevie? Are you wanted?

The level of unbridled stupidity and ignorance you display on this forum every single day is fucking fascinating...

Being a fat dummy isn't crime in Texas, son. Maybe the law is different in Florida.

Well, lose some weight, you fat fuck, and you won't have to worry about it anywhere...
 
Again, you're full of it. You just keep blowing smoke, and take time and effort to do it. But giving the reading audience the Post # that displays in no uncertain terms what you claim is just beyond you? :rolleyes:

A simple search of this thread under your name shows numerous posts by you where you do any and everything BUT give a direct, in no uncertain terms answer to the OP.

And you never will, because you're just another run-of-the-mill sheet wearing MAGA troll...all noise and no substance. In short, you lie like a rug.

Your token candidate lost despite heavy gerry mandering and voter suppression tactics by the GOP. The videos of "butter won't melt in my mouth" defense and support by Georgian voters for Walker was hysterical. A pathetic joke...much like you here.

Say goodnight Gracie.

Again, dumbfuck, I didn't have a candidate in that race.

I don't live in Georgia...
 
Fact:
On November 2, 1954, Strom Thurmond won his Senate seat in a general election on a write in vote. As the commercial for our state lottery would say, "Hey, you never know!"

One time in almost 70 years just proves my point. But in local elections a write-in can and occasionally does allow a win.
 
Why are you afraid of police stations, Stevie? Are you wanted? .
The level of unbridled stupidity and ignorance you display on this forum every single day is fucking fascinating...


Translation: Yes, I don't want to be arrested as a blundering idiot assaulting an elderly man in Texas.

Good job, Stevie!!! That's the correct answer. LOL

Being a fat dummy isn't crime in Texas, son. Maybe the law is different in Florida.
Well, lose some weight, you fat fuck, and you won't have to worry about it anywhere...
The fact you think that 9th Grade level of reply is "witty" is very interesting to me, Stevie. The more you post, along with the angrier you get, is very revealing about your true face.

It's digital profiling. After 20+ years of fighting the WOT online, our heroes in law enforcement can run your profile through in minutes. It helps to have a picture. LOL

6wam70.jpg
 
One time in almost 70 years just proves my point. But in local elections a write-in can and occasionally does allow a win.

Agreed, but like voting for the Libertarian candidate for President, it's not that I think there is a chance of winning. It's that I'm spoiling the election math for the two major candidates. It's also a refusal to vote for the "lesser evil" between Republicans and Democrats.

It's unlikely there'd be a Libertarian Party President until there are more states with LP governors, congressmen and other top political leaders.
 
Translation: Yes, I don't want to be arrested as a blundering idiot assaulting an elderly man in Texas.


You seem to have this weird fantasy about getting your ass kicked.

Did your parents beat you as a child? Did they not hug you enough? Did you have to change your own poopy diapers?

LOL!

The fact you think that 9th Grade level of reply is "witty" is very interesting to me, Stevie. The more you post, along with the angrier you get, is very revealing about your true face.

It's digital profiling. After 20+ years of fighting the WOT online, our heroes in law enforcement can run your profile through in minutes.

And you seem to have this odd belief that your delusions will be what drives law enforcement authorities to act.

Seriously, you need psychiatric help.

And a lot of it...
 
You seem to have this weird fantasy about getting your ass kicked....

And you seem to have this odd belief that your delusions will be what drives law enforcement authorities to act....

Stevie, you're the Internet Tough Guy threatening to beat people or have his relatives do it. Sure, weasel your way around it, but it's clear that you meant the comments to be intimidating.

Wrong again, Stevie. All I can do is my civic duty. What NCIS, the FBI or local law enforcement does is up to them.
 
Stevie, you're the Internet Tough Guy threatening to beat people or have his relatives do it. Sure, weasel your way around it, but it's clear that you meant the comments to be intimidating.

My comment about my nephew being able to kick your ass was meant to demonstrate that you're a pussy. Yet, in that diseased little melon atop your shoulders, that equates to me sending him into whatever slum you live in to kick your ass. The truth is that you can't provide a single post of mine in which I've either threatened to beat you or have you beaten. You can't do it because you're a pathological liar.

You're a delusional old fool, and a stolen valor scumbag...

Wrong again, Stevie. All I can do is my civic duty. What NCIS, the FBI or local law enforcement does is up to them.

Well, since you seem so convinced that I'm up to nefarious dealings, your "civic duty", if you were a good American, would be to bring me to the attention of the authorities.

But you haven't done that, have you? No, because you're a shitty American who can't walk the walk, that's why.

You're a cowardly little pussy, and that's all you'll ever be...
 
My comment about my nephew being able to kick your ass was meant to demonstrate that you're a pussy....
There's no doubt in my mind that you are stupid enough to think that works, Stevie.

This is one of many reasons why I believe you are also stupid enough to steal for the Navy, to support WSE terrorist groups and, without consciously knowing it, to break the law enough to end up under arrest.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Walker IS a "local" politician. But FYI, local politicians make up the national gov't....you know, congressmen and senators. The OP question remains. Care to answer?

Walker is not a local politician. The race was for the US Senate.

And FYI, there are a lot of people who make a very good living staying at the city council level for decades. They'll never hold office above Mayor and they don't want to. There's a reason for that.

So, now that your fuckwittery has been exposed I ask a question...how can a district be represented in the House when the only viable candidates are pledged to Parties with National platforms?

Pay attention you IMBECILE! The election was for a STATE representative to the Senate that governs the entire USA. To do that, you have a state election by the local citizenry of that State. Look it up if you don't believe me. You're a prime example of why they should mandate a civics course in our school system again.

Hell, there was even question that Walker was a true local resident, given his home in Texas and all. But his loss has made that all academic now.

The rest of your drivel is just a waste of time and space. You, like all the other MAGA minions, didn't have the cojones or the mental capacity to honestly answer the OP. That is because in all those years you spent defining your concept of good political leader when you went after Obama, you inadvertently described why Walker was so woefully inadequate to fulfill those definition. The faux support you gave was so hypocritical it was laughable.

Now, say something predictably inane as I dismiss further discussion with you here.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Again, you're full of it. You just keep blowing smoke, and take time and effort to do it. But giving the reading audience the Post # that displays in no uncertain terms what you claim is just beyond you?

A simple search of this thread under your name shows numerous posts by you where you do any and everything BUT give a direct, in no uncertain terms answer to the OP.

And you never will, because you're just another run-of-the-mill sheet wearing MAGA troll...all noise and no substance. In short, you lie like a rug.

Your token candidate lost despite heavy gerry mandering and voter suppression tactics by the GOP. The videos of "butter won't melt in my mouth" defense and support by Georgian voters for Walker was hysterical. A pathetic joke...much like you here.

Say goodnight Gracie.




Again, dumbfuck, I didn't have a candidate in that race.

I don't live in Georgia...

:whoa: So by your "logic", there's no point of even discussing the OP because you don't live in Georgia. Also, you now profess that you "didn't have a candidate in that race".

So tell us, my sheet wearing simpleton, why do you spend DAYS responding to an OP that asks a simple question regarding a political candidate that you have NO interest in by any degree? And have yet to give a definitive answer, even after the election is over and Walker is defeated?

If I were you, I'd see a therapist about this. It must be the heat under that pointy hood has clouded your cognitive reasoning. Adios.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Fact:
On November 2, 1954, Strom Thurmond won his Senate seat in a general election on a write in vote. As the commercial for our state lottery would say, "Hey, you never know!"


One time in almost 70 years just proves my point. But in local elections a write-in can and occasionally does allow a win.

No, it sorely contradicts encompassing finality of your previous statement. But you at least generally concede to the point. Thanks.
 
Agreed, but like voting for the Libertarian candidate for President, it's not that I think there is a chance of winning. It's that I'm spoiling the election math for the two major candidates. It's also a refusal to vote for the "lesser evil" between Republicans and Democrats.

It's unlikely there'd be a Libertarian Party President until there are more states with LP governors, congressmen and other top political leaders.

To vote to purposely to "spoil" an election usually is done to put the "spoiler" in a "kind maker" position ... by asking his supporters to forgo him/her and vote for one of the other candidates.

Otherwise, people usually do write in votes to send a message to that (serious) candidate that they have support, which can lead to a possible future election at a lower but effective level. Just saying.
 
To vote to purposely to "spoil" an election usually is done to put the "spoiler" in a "kind maker" position ... by asking his supporters to forgo him/her and vote for one of the other candidates.

Otherwise, people usually do write in votes to send a message to that (serious) candidate that they have support, which can lead to a possible future election at a lower but effective level. Just saying.
Usually. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils.

No doubt that works for dogcatcher or Mayor of Mayberry. Writing in a Presidential candidate is fine. The main point is to skew the vote count against the two major parties.

It's also another reason to support ranking votes. :)

Election 2016:
Trump 46.1%
Hillary 48.2%
Third Party 5.7%
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
To vote to purposely to "spoil" an election usually is done to put the "spoiler" in a "kind maker" position ... by asking his supporters to forgo him/her and vote for one of the other candidates.

Otherwise, people usually do write in votes to send a message to that (serious) candidate that they have support, which can lead to a possible future election at a lower but effective level. Just saying.

Usually. I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils.

No doubt that works for dogcatcher or Mayor of Mayberry. Writing in a Presidential candidate is fine. The main point is to skew the vote count against the two major parties.

It's also another reason to support ranking votes. :)

Election 2016:
Trump 46.1%
Hillary 48.2%
Third Party 5.7%

I agree with not voting for the lesser of 2 evils. But rather than not vote at all, I like to put a write-in for whom I think isn't evil. It helps build 3rd party alternatives across the political spectrum at sometime in the near future (IMHO).
 
Back
Top