A trial without witnesses is unconstitutional.

R

Rune

Mjölner
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquired then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

It never was a trial, everyone know this, Pelosi's jury was never the Senate, rather the American public, and after Mitch denied witnesses and evidence, it only furthered her case
 
7qYNRoW.jpg
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

Oh but you were fine with the House not letting Trump call witnesses?

Spare me your fucking faux indignation

But yeah, win at any costs. We learned from you fucks. You created this mess now sit in your own shit and suck it bitch
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
There will be no going back.
Is that really what you fools want?
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...

Obviously that is exactly what they want...and what they are battling to get.

What a sad, loser group they are.
 
I think we all knew this was inevitable, even though the Bolton revelations did give us a bit of hope. The acquittal is also inevitable.

And so is the coming blue wave next November, so take heart, Patriots.
 
archives said:
It never was a trial, everyone know this, Pelosi's jury was never the Senate, rather the American public, and after Mitch denied witnesses and evidence, it only furthered her case
Click to expand...

The outcome was easily predictable. Were you dishonest lying hacks this bent out of shape when Democrats refused to convict Clinton? You whiny hypocrites really need to STFU. :rolleyes:
 
I want to remind all the lie filled leftist hypocrites in the forum of what happened in 1998 and they were all fine with Democrats blocking Clinton's impeachment where there were REAL impeachable crimes, not the laughable bullshit Schiff and Nadler tried to pull off here.

Jerry Nadler | We're Lowering the Standard of Impeachment
 
Frank Apisa said:
Obviously that is exactly what they want...and what they are battling to get.

What a sad, loser group they are.
Click to expand...

To be specific the ‘losers’ are the House. Myself and others warned them about rushing the vote to impeach and sending an incomplete record and crime-less articles to the Senate. One didn’t need to be a prophet to predict the outcome. Pelosi by-passed ‘the bird in the hand’ censure vote and went for the impeachment bird in the bush. All to appease her radical flank. It was a historic miscalculation on her part and will probably cost her seat as Speaker or minority leader.

You won’t like this part lol. The winner is the country. After this, future presidents [including those of your own party] should be safe from party-line impeachment votes. Had Democrats succeeded with this, the next impeachment wouldn’t take 25 years to get here. It would be more like 2-3 before the end of the decade. Abuse of power is too broad and ambiguous—and too easy for hyper-partisan House members to use to *contrive* articles of impeachment with.
 
Darth Omar said:
To be specific the ‘losers’ are the House. Myself and others warned them about rushing the vote to impeach and sending an incomplete record and crime-less articles to the Senate. One didn’t need to be a prophet to predict the outcome. Pelosi by-passed ‘the bird in the hand’ censure vote and went for the impeachment bird in the bush. All to appease her radical flank. It was a historic miscalculation on her part and will probably cost her seat as Speaker or minority leader.

You won’t like this part lol. The winner is the country. After this, future presidents [including those of your own party] should be safe from party-line impeachment votes. Had Democrats succeeded with this, the next impeachment wouldn’t take 25 years to get here. It would be more like 2-3 before the end of the decade. Abuse of power is too broad and ambiguous—and too easy for hyper-partisan House members to use to *contrive* articles of impeachment with.
Click to expand...

Indeed
 
Imagine how big Trump will win with Ukraine and Russia in his corner?

Next up China and Mexico

Then we will cancel voting in California and New York

Nothing you leftists can do about it really
 
Rune said:
If the President is acquitted in a trial where witnesses were banned then Autocracy has begun.
Click to expand...
Not the definition of an autocracy, dude. Redefinition fallacy.
Rune said:
There will be no going back.
Click to expand...
Fine. The trial is over then.
Rune said:
Is that really what you fools want?
Click to expand...
Yup.
Rune said:
To win a battle but lose everything?
Click to expand...
What has been lost? Void argument fallacy.

Are you going to make up disaster scenarios just like you do for the Church of Global Warming?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top