☪ Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand, it's a Muslim. Again. ☪

You wish. You're just playing semantics now.
Too funny! christiefan915 never learned that semantics are all anyone has on internet political fora! How does anyone not know this? christiefan915 thinks that we somehow have more than just words, images and emojis!

Somebody please explain to christiefan915 how this internet thing works.
 
Too funny! christiefan915 never learned that semantics are all anyone has on internet political fora! How does anyone not know this? christiefan915 thinks that we somehow have more than just words, images and emojis!

Somebody please explain to christiefan915 how this internet thing works.

I have tried. She's stubborn. :nodyes:
 
Haw, haw, ...... haw.
So the gunships "struck targets" (never disputed) but I saw no mention of the bombers actually dropping any bombs. Yes, they were there to possibly drop bombs (intimidation/deterrent), but you are claiming that the bombers not only dropped bombs, but that they took out Afghans' homes. Show me.
 
Where did


@IBDaMann got his spanking.

Haw, haw, ...... haw.
Relating back to his question- there are many Muslim refugees because ' the West ' has bombed their countries.
Not all the atrocities perpetrated by refugees in ' the West ' are carried out by Muslims- and those that are are not necessarily due to Islamic religion.
 
So the gunships "struck targets" (never disputed) but I saw no mention of the bombers actually dropping any bombs. Yes, they were there to possibly drop bombs, but you are claiming that the bombers not only dropped bombs, but that they took out Afghans' homes. Show me.

The proof was posted already, by myself.
 
So the gunships "struck targets" (never disputed) but I saw no mention of the bombers actually dropping any bombs. Yes, they were there to possibly drop bombs (intimidation/deterrent), but you are claiming that the bombers not only dropped bombs, but that they took out Afghans' homes. Show me.
You are attempting to make your wrong point by putting words in my mouth. Go away. You lost. Suck it up. Fuck off. STFU.
 
So the gunships "struck targets" (never disputed) but I saw no mention of the bombers actually dropping any bombs. Yes, they were there to possibly drop bombs (intimidation/deterrent), but you are claiming that the bombers not only dropped bombs, but that they took out Afghans' homes. Show me.
"So the gunships "struck targets" (never disputed) but I saw no mention of the bombers actually dropping any bombs."

facepalm-really.gif
 
Back
Top