About that J-6 So-Called 'Insurrection' NONSENSE

[Into the Night]

Are you denying the intent was to stop the lawful proceedings of Congress?

What lawful proceedings of Congress??????!?

 

[Into the Night]

Bullshit, Terry. You claimed you knew it wasn't an insurrection. How can you make such a declaration without knowing the intent?

The intent was apparently to take selfies of themselves and leave.

 

[Into the Night]

Why do you think that is a fair comparison?

For the simple reason that Democrats were destroying parts of cities.

It is not. You rightys were merely trying to overthrow the government and establish Trump as a permanent leader.

Taking selfies is not overthrowing the government. Trump did not condone the riots. The only insurrection was by Democrats. It was DEMOCRATS that began attacking the police.

It was the end of the American system you sought.

America is not a system. YOU seek to discard the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions. It is DEMOCRATS that are the insurrectionists.

What could be worse? I have no idea where your picture is from, but rest assured, it was the cops who attacked first.

Cops don't commit arson. Cops don't loot and pillage. Cops don't start riots. DEMOCRATS did all of it, including on Jan 6th.

In the capitol. it was you guys who attacked the police and the politicians.

DEMOCRATS.

The Trumpys on 1-6 were exactly in opposition to the continuance of America.

No insurrection, except by DEMOCRATS. It is DEMOCRATS that conducted the coup (so far successful) and installed Biden (he was not elected).

What is bigger than that?

War, which DEMOCRATS want to start.

 

[Nordberg]

It is scary how insanely wrong you are. You are a Trumpy and seem to start with anything Trump did was fine. Nixon said "If the president does it, it is legal". You have adopted that out of your bigoted Right wing ignorance and apply it to Trump. You speak the opposite of fact over and over and seem to believe it.

 

[Into the Night]

It is scary how insanely wrong you are. You are a Trumpy and seem to start with anything Trump did was fine. Nixon said "If the president does it, it is legal". You have adopted that out of your bigoted Right wing ignorance and apply it to Trump. You speak the opposit of fact over and over and seem to believe it.

Random phrases and buzzwords. No apparent coherency. Looks like you're on tilt again.

 

[LurchAddams]

There was no Holocaust by Trump. Trump did not condone the riot. Election fraud by Democrats has been a problem for decades. It was so bad that the 2020 election faulted. It happened yet AGAIN in the 2022 'elections' in several States.

I've asked you for proof of election fraud for months. You dodge by claiming you've already provided it. If that were true, you could just post it again. You're nothing but a liar and freak.

Leave me alone.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I've asked you for proof of election fraud for months. You dodge by claiming you've already provided it. If that were true, you could just post it again. You're nothing but a liar and freak.

Leave me alone.

Although Sybil doesn't address it directly because he stopped writing his manifesto, a quick scan through it will give you a good idea about what his answer would be: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/board/19/debunking-signature

 

[Into the Night]

I've asked you for proof of election fraud for months.

I already gave it to you. RQAA.

You dodge by claiming you've already provided it.

No dodge. I already provided it.

If that were true, you could just post it again.

Already did. RQAA.

You're nothing but a liar and freak.

No, you can't make election fraud by Democrats go away by calling me names.

Leave me alone.

No.

 

[Into the Night]

Although Sybil doesn't address it directly because he stopped writing his manifesto, a quick scan through it will give you a good idea about what his answer would be: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/board/19/debunking-signature

Redefinition fallacy (forum<->manifesto).

 

[Nordberg]

The intent was apparently to take selfies of themselves and leave.

Don't do that. You know better.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Redefinition fallacy (forum<->manifesto).

You can deny it's there, Sybil, but I love sending people over there to see what you look like.

 

[Lightbringer]

In some cases, that's true. On the whole, three-hour riot describes it fairly well. Calling it an "insurrection" is to be utterly and completely delusional.

Riot does not describe it well. I've seen a real riot, I was deployed to LA in '92. What happened at the Capitol building was not even close to a riot.

 

[Into the Night]

Don't do that. You know better.

Do what?

 

[Into the Night]

You can deny it's there, Sybil, but I love sending people over there to see what you look like.

I don't deny the forum is there, twit.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I don't deny the forum is there, twit.

Wow. That ashamed of it, eh? Why not just take it down if you are embarrassed by it, Sybil?

 

[LurchAddams]

Although Sybil doesn't address it directly because he stopped writing his manifesto, a quick scan through it will give you a good idea about what his answer would be: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/board/19/debunking-signature

There should be a rule here against the nuisance posting ITTN and all his socks do.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

There should be a rule here against the nuisance posting ITTN and all his socks do.

There is; Rule 14.

There's also the Ignore function and reply function to clog is mailbox.

Report him for Rule 14 when he gets excessive. If enough people report him, Damo will give him warnings. If Sybil keeps doing it and members keep reporting him, Sybil will be given a short vacation.

FWIW, Damo usually won't do anything unless people report the problem.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?2-Rules-of-the-Board!&p=2#post2

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts. Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.

.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Riot does not describe it well. I've seen a real riot, I was deployed to LA in '92. What happened at the Capitol building was not even close to a riot.

Okay, you have an alternative? It certainly wasn't an "Insurrection" unless it was the lamest, most pathetic, incompetent, and meaningless one in modern history...

 

[Phantasmal]

Okay, you have an alternative? It certainly wasn't an "Insurrection" unless it was the lamest, most pathetic, incompetent, and meaningless one in modern history...

BINGO, that’s why it failed, it was the lamest, most pathetic, most incompetent and meaning attempt, but consider the source! What does Trump do right?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

BINGO, that’s why it failed, it was the lamest, most pathetic, most incompetent and meaning attempt, but consider the source! What does Trump do right?

That didn't make it an "insurrection" however. Using that word is both a gross overreach, and inappropriate to what happened.