About that J-6 So-Called 'Insurrection' NONSENSE

T. A. Gardner said:
That didn't make it an "insurrection" however. Using that word is both a gross overreach, and inappropriate to what happened.
Click to expand...
No, it is exactly the definition of an insurrection.

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the ...

rGjjAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
https://uscode.house.gov › view

[h=3]18 USC 2383: Rebellion or insurrection - U.S. Code[/h]





The insurrectionist were trying to stop the transfer of power by invading the Capitol where the House was in session.

That, sir, is an insurrection.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Assigning motive to a political party is one thing, but are you also claiming the US courts are controlled by the "deep state" or the Jews?

Explain why so many have been convicted or have pled guilty: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases
Click to expand...

No, I'm not. So many have been convicted, with something like 90% + being misdemeanors like entering a restricted building or simple trespass, and the few other cases being ones mostly of things like assaulting a police officer and the like. Look at the number of "insurrection" convictions. That's zero or next to zero.

Since federal prosecutors have considerable coercive power over most defendants--they have time and for all intents an unlimited budget-- they will run defendants out of money and time and usually force a plea deal. In that sense, yes, the federal court system is corrupt and doesn't mete out justice so much as retribution to pad prosecutor's resumes for promotion.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, I'm not. So many have been convicted, with something like 90% + being misdemeanors like entering a restricted building or simple trespass, and the few other cases being ones mostly of things like assaulting a police officer and the like. Look at the number of "insurrection" convictions. That's zero or next to zero.

Since federal prosecutors have considerable coercive power over most defendants--they have time and for all intents an unlimited budget-- they will run defendants out of money and time and usually force a plea deal. In that sense, yes, the federal court system is corrupt and doesn't mete out justice so much as retribution to pad prosecutor's resumes for promotion.
Click to expand...

If you are truly as smart and educated as you believe yourself to be, then you know the advantages of using a mob as cover for a coup... something like 90%+ cover.

The fact you keep defending this attack on our government tells me you've completely disavowed your oath and/or gone insane.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, I'm not. So many have been convicted, with something like 90% + being misdemeanors like entering a restricted building or simple trespass, and the few other cases being ones mostly of things like assaulting a police officer and the like. Look at the number of "insurrection" convictions. That's zero or next to zero.

Since federal prosecutors have considerable coercive power over most defendants--they have time and for all intents an unlimited budget-- they will run defendants out of money and time and usually force a plea deal. In that sense, yes, the federal court system is corrupt and doesn't mete out justice so much as retribution to pad prosecutor's resumes for promotion.
Click to expand...

You are a fascist.
 
Phantasmal said:
No, it is exactly the definition of an insurrection.

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the ...

rGjjAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
https://uscode.house.gov › view

[h=3]18 USC 2383: Rebellion or insurrection - U.S. Code[/h]





The insurrectionist were trying to stop the transfer of power by invading the Capitol where the House was in session.

That, sir, is an insurrection.
Click to expand...

You just described Democrats.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, I'm not. So many have been convicted, with something like 90% + being misdemeanors like entering a restricted building or simple trespass, and the few other cases being ones mostly of things like assaulting a police officer and the like. Look at the number of "insurrection" convictions. That's zero or next to zero.

Since federal prosecutors have considerable coercive power over most defendants--they have time and for all intents an unlimited budget-- they will run defendants out of money and time and usually force a plea deal. In that sense, yes, the federal court system is corrupt and doesn't mete out justice so much as retribution to pad prosecutor's resumes for promotion.
Click to expand...

The point was the entire insurrection was started to prevent the certification of the electoral votes. That was what a joint congress was doing. They were doing a duty that is assigned to them on that date at that time.
Lots of people are down charged to keep the system grinding along. That does not mean they were not guilty of worse. I am sure you have bitched about plea bargaining. You are also wrong about the charges. https://time.com/6133336/jan-6-capitol-riot-arrests-sentences/
 
Nordberg said:
The point was the entire insurrection was started to prevent the certification of the electoral votes. That was what a joint congress was doing. They were doing a duty that is assigned to them on that date at that time.
Lots of people are down charged to keep the system grinding along. That does not mean they were not guilty of worse. I am sure you have bitched about plea bargaining. You are also wrong about the charges. https://time.com/6133336/jan-6-capitol-riot-arrests-sentences/
Click to expand...

Gardner wanted Trump's attack on the Capitol to be success.
 
Into the Night said:
What lawful proceedings of Congress??????!?
Click to expand...

I hope you are lying about this. So you do not know that 1-6 is designated as when a joint congress certifies the electoral votes and in doing so, they certify the election. They were doing a designated political function and duty.
This is where you make up some lies.
 
Nordberg said:
The point was the entire insurrection
Click to expand...
There was no insurrection, except by Democrats.
Nordberg said:
was started to prevent the certification of the electoral votes.
Click to expand...
No electoral college. Too many States never selected their electoral college members. There was no election in 2020.
Nordberg said:
That was what a joint congress was doing.
Click to expand...
Congress has no authority to choose electoral college members for any State.
Nordberg said:
They were doing a duty that is assigned to them on that date at that time.
Click to expand...
Congress has no authority or duty to choose electoral college members for any State.
Nordberg said:
Lots of people are down charged to keep the system grinding along. That does not mean they were not guilty of worse. I am sure you have bitched about plea bargaining. You are also wrong about the charges. https://time.com/6133336/jan-6-capitol-riot-arrests-sentences/
Click to expand...
Political prisoners.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top