About that J-6 So-Called 'Insurrection' NONSENSE

Nordberg said:
Admitted what is blatantly obvious? Why is that needed? It was a right-wing, white power -attempt to overthrow America. Blacks were conspicuously absent. It was a white person's crime in public and on video.
Click to expand...

Democrats are left-wing racists that DID conduct a successful coup. You can't make what Democrats have done go away by blaming Trump, dude.
 
Into the Night said:
Yes. Projecting your problems on anyone else is a blatant lie.
Click to expand...

Is that all you can do? When is the last time you added to a discussion? I cannot remember you doing it. Drive-by insults are not that and repeating some inane fallacy is not. Saying you offered proof that the election did not happen is another lie because it most assuredly did. You make outrageous statements like that with regularity. You are very low level and you should try harder.
 
Into the Night said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Never said...that is a lie that right wing wonks keep repeating via various pod casts, Fox News, etc.

To date, local police, state police and DHS have gone on record stating that the major riots that occurred during BLM protests and demonstrations were instigated by OUTSIDE agitators not affiliated or connected to the organization.
Click to expand...

You can't make what Democrats did go away, dude.


Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Jan. 6th was prompted, promoted and hyped by affiliates of the Trump re-election campaign along with various members of the folk that showed up at the rally who (via court cases) have been revealed to have intended to riot leading to insurrection. Matters of fact, matters of history.
Click to expand...

You misspelled Ray Epps, a Democrat.
Click to expand...

1. You can't ignore the facts I've referred to...easily verified and documented. Seems you're just in denial of reality in favor of your revisionism.

2. I never mentioned the man. If you're going to insert him into the discussion, please explain the relevance.
 
Into the Night said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your proof? Please use documented facts that logically prove what you say.....NOT supposition and conjecture or flat out mis-information.
Click to expand...


You can't make what Ray Epps did go away, dude.
Click to expand...

Dropping a name isn't proof. Explain to the reading audience how this man is proof of what you say. Please provide valid, documentation and NOT your opinion, supposition and conjecture as the latter are NOT facts.
 
Nordberg said:
Is that all you can do? When is the last time you added to a discussion?
Click to expand...
About 30 seconds ago.
Nordberg said:
I cannot remember you doing it.
Click to expand...
You can't remember much of anything.
Nordberg said:
Drive-by insults are not that
Click to expand...
Then stop making them.
Nordberg said:
and repeating some inane fallacy is not.
Click to expand...
It is YOU repeating the same inane fallacies. Inversion fallacy.
Nordberg said:
Saying you offered proof that the election did not happen is another lie because it most assuredly did.
Click to expand...
No, you can't make the evidence of election fraud go away by denying it. I have already shown some of it to you. So have others. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Nordberg said:
You make outrageous statements like that with regularity.
Click to expand...
You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
Nordberg said:
You are very low level and you should try harder.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
With the New Year, I'm giving everyone a chance at a rational, logical, fact based debate.
Click to expand...

You are not debating.
Click to expand...

Sure I am....I'm doing it with posters who discuss opinions supported by valid, documented facts. Those who are not are sorted out and called on it. I put forth opinions, refer to current events to start threads and post responses ... as do others. Case in point, the subject title and OP. Enter my name in the thread search and you can see my position and statements. If you do not consider me debating the issue, then what do YOU call a "debate"?
 
Taichiliberal said:
1. You can't ignore the facts I've referred to...easily verified and documented. Seems you're just in denial of reality in favor of your revisionism.
Click to expand...
Not facts. Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'. Buzzword fallacy. You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
Taichiliberal said:
2. I never mentioned the man.
Click to expand...
That's right. I did.
Taichiliberal said:
If you're going to insert him into the discussion, please explain the relevance.
Click to expand...
Obviously you don't pay attention to what he was doing in front of the Capitol building or in the days leading up to Jan 6th.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Sure I am....
Click to expand...
Nope. You are not debating.
Taichiliberal said:
I'm doing it with posters who discuss opinions supported by valid, documented facts.
Click to expand...
Learn what 'fact' means. Buzzword fallacy.
Taichiliberal said:
Those who are not are sorted out and called on it.
Click to expand...
Discard of philosophy.
Taichiliberal said:
I put forth opinions, refer to current events to start threads and post responses ... as do others.
Click to expand...
Just like everyone here.
Taichiliberal said:
Case in point, the subject title and OP. Enter my name in the thread search and you can see my position and statements. If you do not consider me debating the issue, then what do YOU call a "debate"?
Click to expand...
None of that is a debate. There are no debates anywhere on this forum. There are only conversations. There is no formal presentation of arguments here on JPP.

You are not even having a conversation right now. You are quibbling.
 
Into the Night said:
Not facts. Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'. Buzzword fallacy. You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

That's right. I did.

Obviously you don't pay attention to what he was doing in front of the Capitol building or in the days leading up to Jan 6th.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

So it seems you're just intent on your usual tactics of MAGA trolling. For the rational reading audience, this puts the kibosh on the MAGA parroting about Mr. Epp; https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-centers-on-baseless-claim-about-ray-epps/

More facts that ITN will deny or put forth his usual neologistic approach to historic word definitions.

As the the chronology of the posts shows, ITN cannot prove his claim that Democrats were behind the Jan. 6th attempted insurrection. He'll just label anything that doesn't fit his narrative as "fake news" an post year old disproven MAGA propaganda.
 
Into the Night said:
Nope. You are not debating.

Learn what 'fact' means. Buzzword fallacy.

Discard of philosophy.

Just like everyone here.

None of that is a debate. There are no debates anywhere on this forum. There are only conversations. There is no formal presentation of arguments here on JPP.

You are not even having a conversation right now. You are quibbling.
Click to expand...

Fascinating how ITN seems intent upon pushing his revisionist rhetoric and neologistic blather as rational, factual and logical. Pity for him that the chronology of the posts gives the reader with a decent H.S. GED a better perspective on his ramblings.

ITN cannot prove his claim that the Democratic Party orchestrated the Jan. 6th attempted insurrection. And his parrot nonsense about Mr. Epps was factually debunked last year. MAGA trolling seems to be all that ITN is interested in. Attempts at rational, fact based logic are futile against ITN's tactics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top