ACB hearings - Watching now

Last edited:
There needs to be term limits..if one party that realizes we need that could take the House, Senate, and presidency..that needs to be the 1st thing done.
Term limits NAOW!

I am a very strong proponent for term limits for the House and Senate. Our founders never intended the Congress to be a full time career.

I would like to see the House held to four two year terms and the Senate to two four year terms. In addition, if you have served in the House, you cannot jump over to the Senate to serve another eight years and vice versa.

In addition, I would like to see a retirement age of 70 implemented. We don't need confused old septuagenarians making decisions for us.

I wish the Justices of the Supreme Court would do that same. I would be fine with a term limit at age 74.
 
You starting the thread without one is ..less than optimal. You started a thread on a subject without a link. I'm not busting your balls, but a link would help to make sure everybody's on the same page.
The first one Google turns up is CNN.
Yes, my Google-Fu is very strong, but what link are you watching?

It is a commentary on a CURRENT event that is happening in real time. Why would you need a link to it? You can tune in anytime. ;)
 
Just to prove she's a right-wing religious stooge that plans on legislating from the Bench.

What a stupid lie filled statement JackOFF. Apparently you watch too much CNN. I don't think you can post without lying and looking stupid. Be less dishonest and stupid JackOFF.
 
It is a commentary on a CURRENT event that is happening in real time. Why would you need a link to it? You can tune in anytime. ;)
To WHAT EXACTLY?! Hellooo!
Are you seriously going to be no help like that?
This thread would get closed at the forum I came from.

Rhetoric only is not enough.
 
Thankfully @dutch uncle provided a link.

Unlike OP.

This Durbin is an asshole. These fuckers are doing nothing but filibustering.
 

Eyeroll all you want, that's bullshit! I like ya, but straight up.

Your lack of providing a link is NOT a good thing.
Matter of fact I give this thread nothing more, I'll post in Dutch Uncle's because you have the wrong attitude, mister!
Furthermore I'll assert you do not have a promising career in internet debate.
 
Eyeroll all you want, that's bullshit! I like ya, but straight up.

Your lack of providing a link is NOT a good thing.
Matter of fact I give this thread nothing more, I'll post in Dutch Uncle's because you have the wrong attitude, mister!
Furthermore I'll assert you do not have a promising career in internet debate.

Go for it. I hope you can find a link to the currently ongoing hearings. :laugh:
 
She is lying. Trump said he would pick a judge who would help him in an election case, be against Roe and void the ACA. Then he interviewed a lot of potential judges and settled on her. She agreed to all those positions, now she never heard of them.
 
How do you feel about term limits for The House and Senate?

We have immediate term limits. If you do not like your politician, vote them out. Why do you want the system to kick out a politician the people think is doing a good job? Our system awards politicians with better and more important committees as they gather seniority. Go ahead and pass term limits in your state. It will give away your power.
 
What a stupid lie filled statement JackOFF. Apparently you watch too much CNN. I don't think you can post without lying and looking stupid. Be less dishonest and stupid JackOFF.

Do you deny that she plans to legislate from the Bench. Of course you don't. You know as well as everyone else that is why Republicans are trying to ram this through.
 
She is lying. Trump said he would pick a judge who would help him in an election case, be against Roe and void the ACA. Then he interviewed a lot of potential judges and settled on her. She agreed to all those positions, now she never heard of them.

We have immediate term limits. If you do not like your politician, vote them out. Why do you want the system to kick out a politician the people think is doing a good job? Our system awards politicians with better and more important committees as they gather seniority. Go ahead and pass term limits in your state. It will give away your power.

tenor.gif
 
Do you deny that she plans to legislate from the Bench. Of course you don't.

Try not to answer for me JackOFF. It makes you look stupid, dishonest and pathetic. She absolutely does not believe in legislating from the bench as all her decisions and writings prove.

Try to be less dishonest and stupid JackOFF.


You know as well as everyone else that is why Republicans are trying to ram this through.

There you go with those dumb lie filled memes JackOFF. Nothing is being "rammed" through. That is another dishonest lie filled meme from the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass.

In fact, they shouldn't need any additional hearings which only provide a partisan political ad for the loons in the Party of the Jackass.

If she was good enough to get on the circuit court and was approved only three years ago, they only need to go to a vote. After all, the lying, partisan loons in the Party of the Jackass have already stated they intend to vote no.

I hope her final confirmation makes you cry. I do wish you could be less stupid and dishonest. Really I do.
 
The clear majorirty of Americans want the ACA and Roe v Wade kept in place. Trump put her in to destroy those . It leaves the Dems with little choice. If they want to preserve what the people want, they will have to expand the court. The Reds just stole 2 seats , The Dems have to do something. Take your cheating like a good boy.

I think the Supreme Court Justices are also watching this atrocity and sees this Power Grab for what it is.

So, I think the justices will be asking Amy to recuse herself for the upcoming California vs. Texas hearing- AND ANY HEARING HAVING TO DO WITH THE ELECTION!

One thing the Supreme court members do not want is Donald Trump's shit stains on their court!

Get us past those hearings and Amy will work out fine and will end up becoming a revered member on the bench.

I do not think that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Roberts are guaranteed shoe-ins to end the ACA or reverse the ROE vs. Wade against the people's will.

These justices seem like husbands and fathers and considerate of the negative uncalled for consequences that would bring.

I may be wrong, but I have become more trusting of all of them.

Amy, we know how she will vote, because this has been her lifetime mission and goal.

Stop and think, people over 35 are warned by doctors that having babies at their age are risking having DOWN SYMDROME CHILDREN but yet AMy and her husband chose to do so- and WALLA- DOWN SYNDROME CHILD. That shows desperation to sacrifice oneself to prove some religious point about not having abortions- at the cost of a child that will never reach 30 years old! SEEMS SELFISH TO ME.

And her adopting children from Haiti was an effort to show she is not a racist- as if she needed to do that for her lifetime goal of becoming a Supreme Court Justice- AFTER JUST SERVING ONLY 3 YEARS total as an actual judge AND HAVING SO MANY CASE JUDGMENTS THAT HAVE QUESTIONABLE RACIAL CONNOTATIONS TO THEM.

She has been fascinated with the near GOD-LIKE POWERS of the Supreme Court ever since she worked on the Gore vs. Bush Supreme Court case that decided an election, and also serving under Scalia at a very young age.

And then her writing those papers about Roberts at a time when Trump was campaigning to end the ACA, not much differently than a prostitute shaking her ass to a John, as if saying Hey Mr. Trump I'm your gal!

PEOPLE YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN HER COMING!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top