ACB hearings - Watching now

Truth Detector said:
Try not to answer for me JackOFF. It makes you look stupid, dishonest and pathetic. She absolutely does not believe in legislating from the bench as all her decisions and writings prove.

Try to be less dishonest and stupid JackOFF.



There you go with those dumb lie filled memes JackOFF. Nothing is being "rammed" through. That is another dishonest lie filled meme from the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass.

In fact, they shouldn't need any additional hearings which only provide a partisan political ad for the loons in the Party of the Jackass.

If she was good enough to get on the circuit court and was approved only three years ago, they only need to go to a vote. After all, the lying, partisan loons in the Party of the Jackass have already stated they intend to vote no.

I hope her final confirmation makes you cry. I do wish you could be less stupid and dishonest. Really I do.
Click to expand...

Translation: 'Yes. We all do hope she will Legislate Christian Sharia Law from the Bench.'
 
Jack said:
You support Amy Barrett because she is a Religious Stooge and will push for Christian Sharia Law.
Click to expand...
No....I support her because she's deserves the appointment....You should be watching...you'd agree....Everyone does...Some just won't admit it....
 
Democrats Are Asking Amy Coney Barrett to Violate Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Judicial Standard

Senate Democrats know “that judicial nominees cannot and should not express their personal views on controversial political issues that could come before the courts. Doing so would make them appear biased and unable to do their job,” Kaylee McGhee writes in the Washington Examiner.
 
"Courts departing from the text the Legislature has written, subvert the Will of the People." - Amy Barrett.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
WHY WE MUST HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISTS, LIKE BARRETT, ON THE SCOTUS.
 
Grokmaster said:
"Courts departing from the text the Legislature has written, subvert the Will of the People." - Amy Barrett.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
WHY WE MUST HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISTS, LIKE BARRETT, ON THE SCOTUS.
Click to expand...


Original intention was to have slavery. Which, I suppose, you support.
 
votebiden said:
Original intention was to have slavery. Which, I suppose, you support.
Click to expand...

Where did the Constitution condone slavery? It was never in the original document and the only mention occurs with the adoption of the 13th amendment.

13th Amendment
Section 1
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
 
Truth Detector said:
Where did the Constitution condone slavery? It was never in the original document and the only mention occurs with the adoption of the 13th amendment.

13th Amendment
Section 1
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Click to expand...

blacks are 3/5 a person
 
votebiden said:
blacks are 3/5 a person
Click to expand...

That wasn't the question. Where did the Constitution condone slavery? But for your further education:

“ Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three- fifths of all other persons.”

The three-fifths compromise was designed to stunt the power of the slave states, with the purpose of eventually ending the disgusting practice of slavery.

The founders who lived in the northern states strongly opposed slavery. They insisted on counting the slaves as less than “full persons” to prevent the slave states from getting too many congressmen and too many electoral votes allowing to dominate the government and prevent slavery from ever being abolished.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top