icedancer, us mods literally have a laundry list of about 15 items of you posting all sorts of personal information of certain posters here. You are by far one of the biggest violators on this stuff. BY. FAR.
This stuff was from a long time ago where our personal information clause was much more strict and less defined. We do not retroactively ban, which is why you are still here, and why christie christie wasn't banned either. (Although again, you are by far a more habitual and egregious offender based on your history).
Additionally, we have a history of going lighter on first time/infrequent/minor offenses. This is true, but it's equally applied to all sides. General names, an erroneous comment, etc, will usually result in weaker measures. Sometimes we edit, sometimes we warn, sometimes we do temp bans. It depends entirely on history and context.
All this bitching about us being biased or inconsistent is just little pouty girl feet stomping. We gave damnyankee warnings and temp bans too, when he had a users picture in his avatar for example. We JUST LET ALIAS COME BACK off a 60 day ban after POSTING A PICTURE OF SOMEONE, the very person that you actually accuse us of being unwaveringly on the side of.
But if anyone is worried about us being biased, or are worried about being stuck in this murky grey area where us mods have to rule which personal information qualifies as banworthy or not, there is obviously a very simple solution to make sure one avoids being get caught up in the mess:
DON'T FUCKING POST PERSONAL INFORMATION TO BEGIN WITH.
It's actually very easy, most people have already not been doing it for a decade.