All you Affirmative Action Whiners Can STFU Now

Battleborne said:
Some guys would say hell ya roll over and spread the 'proverbial pink' sorry hun not in my case or many that I dealt with..if a girl flashed her pink or whatever to get ahead...I'm sorry but she went to the back of the line...I respect a girl who knows her limits and accepts the responsibility to do what she does best...and that is not spreading the legs..why must ya believe that all guys think this way...a sorry state of affairs you lived thru!
Click to expand...


Sure is, that is why I went from the public banking sector to owning my own business. Not all guys are that way, but way too many of them!
 
doniston said:
OK, I was going to drop this, but I guess not. so in answerr.


1. Yes that is my picture, and I happen to be 78.

2. I am not sexist in the least, but this type of speach is also one on my pet peaves. In person, and a man uses this type of language, I tell him about my displeasure. and ask him to stop around me. I do the same with a woman, usually It only takes the telling once, and they remember. however, I have kicked a man off my property for continued use of profanity, and if anyone still continues to use that type af language around me, I simply refuse to talk to them That kind of talk simply is not necessary The ones where the wost problems occur are with kids. but usually they pay attention to me as well. I have also told kids they couldn't come back if the continued to use obcene language.

I give women every benefit if the doubt, if in deed there is any doubt. but foul language from anyone is disgusting, and when a woman uses it and then signs herself off as a lady, I open my mouth. Unfortunately most men have a foul mouth. so it is harder to control.

(just my response to you insightful comments)
Click to expand...


78! You look great! You are a real cutie! i love it...
 
Battleborne said:
Some guys would say hell ya roll over and spread the 'proverbial pink' sorry hun not in my case or many that I dealt with..if a girl flashed her pink or whatever to get ahead...I'm sorry but she went to the back of the line...I respect a girl who knows her limits and accepts the responsibility to do what she does best...and that is not spreading the legs..why must ya believe that all guys think this way...a sorry state of affairs you lived thru!
Click to expand...

Now I see the obsession with CodePink.

Other than that, no one knows wtf you are rambling about, yet again.
 
Darla said:
Don't be jealous Tiana, unlike with Dixie I am willing to give you this one, lock stock and vodka breath baby! No fight! He is all yours!

In fact, Pm me, I will pay to have him taken off my hands, we can work out a very good deal.
Click to expand...

If that payment will be enough for a down payment on a house we can talk. Otherwise, I think I'll keep on moving right along.
 
doniston said:
Apparently that was no lady. please note that I said I don't use that kid of language either. and no one said that woman should be subserviant. But I do think we ALL should be more Decent.

I suggest you return to school. we are not all sexist but with your immediate attack, I must assume you are.

EDited: I accidently posted this twice, and as a result was returned to the beginning of this thread.

Now your Title had turned my off on the whole thread so I didn't read any of it. But surprise, surprise. this time I saw That by far, I was not the only one who took offense at your language. HEH HEH
Click to expand...

You specifically attacked my femininity for using what you consider to be offensive language. If you're intent is to attack the language itself absent of gender bias, I don't see the relevance of mentioning me not being a "lady" - that's because there is none unless the basis of your attack is sexist.
 
How about this:

Most individuals are white, therefore citing individual rights is inherently racist.
 
LadyT said:
You specifically attacked my femininity for using what you consider to be offensive language. If you're intent is to attack the language itself absent of gender bias, I don't see the relevance of mentioning me not being a "lady" - that's because there is none unless the basis of your attack is sexist.
Click to expand...
Because the others using such terms don't call themselves a lady. I stick by my comments -----the first "and" continued ones and it isn't sexist. it has to do with decency
 
doniston said:
Because the others using such terms don't call themselves a lady. I stick by my comments -----the first "and" continued ones and it isn't sexist. it has to do with decency
Click to expand...

Once again: I did use the term and do call myself a lady. Just because you have hang ups with the work fvck doesn't negate that fact one bit.
 
AssHatZombie said:
The work fvck...

Look. She's a pro!
Click to expand...

Shut up AHZ. I can't stand little weasels who get off on getting into the middle of a situation, so that they can get their shots in, while hiding behind the skirts of someone else.

Stay the fuck out of it, you look like a poodle hiding behind Doninstins skirts, garnering the courage to stick your nose out every once in a while to yelp at Tiana.

You look like a balless weasal.
 
Darla said:
Shut up AHZ. I can't stand little weasels who get off on getting into the middle of a situation, so that they can get their shots in, while hiding behind the skirts of someone else.

Stay the fuck out of it, you look like a poodle hiding behind Doninstins skirts, garnering the courage to stick your nose out every once in a while to yelp at Tiana.

You look like a balless weasal.
Click to expand...

But lady t said fvck was work. It can be, granted, but if you're getting paid well, it can be worth it.
 
Battleborne said:
Because this is pure hype... hey...you do not know me anymore than I know you..but I will tell ya I raised my girls to be fighters and to play fair and know their limits...unlike the college professors who would lead them to believe they are invincible and can do all a 'Man' can physically( this will get them hurt-big time)...this is not true and never will be...not in this century or if ya believe ...in Darwism...not in the next 10, 000 years..man was developed to be more physically strong...to provide for the family..women are stronger on the 'emotional' level...if you believe anything else you are at risk of having women put in dangerous positions...is this your agenda???:shock:
Click to expand...


unlike the college professors who would lead them to believe they are invincible and can do all a 'Man' can physically( this will get them hurt-big time)...this is not true and never will be...not in this century or if ya believe ...in Darwism...not in the next 10, 000 years..man was developed to be more physically strong...to provide for the family..women are stronger on the 'emotional' level..

I had trouble struggling through this. It's barely even english.

However, note to beetleborne: This isn't the year 7,000 B.C. Strength is not merely measured by how heavy of a rock you can lift. This measure of strength does not fundamentally apply, or is relevant, in the year 2007.


But, thank you for demonstrating the knuckle-dragging, regressive nature of 21st century NeoCons! :clink:
 
Cypress said:
unlike the college professors who would lead them to believe they are invincible and can do all a 'Man' can physically( this will get them hurt-big time)...this is not true and never will be...not in this century or if ya believe ...in Darwism...not in the next 10, 000 years..man was developed to be more physically strong...to provide for the family..women are stronger on the 'emotional' level..

I had trouble struggling through this. It's barely even english.

However, note to beetleborne: This isn't the year 7,000 B.C. Strength is not merely measured by how heavy of a rock you can lift. This measure of strength does not fundamentally apply, or is relevant, in the year 2007.


But, thank you for demonstrating the knuckle-dragging, regressive nature of 21st century NeoCons! :clink:
Click to expand...

How naive. Physical strength is required for many modern day jobs.
 
But to summarize, these two she-libs are strongly in favor of perpetuating systems of race based preference so they can discriminate against white people, in some kind of retrograde expression of justice through barbarity.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But to summarize, these two she-libs are strongly in favor of perpetuating systems of race based preference so they can discriminate against white people, in some kind of retrograde expression of justice through barbarity.
Click to expand...

You're such a fvcking joke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top