America Seems Doomed to Split Up

Into the Night said:
He is scared shitless this is going to turn against Dominion or that State legislatures are going to actually do something about preventing future election fraud (some are already acting).
Click to expand...

DO you have anything to prove he is scared shitless?? :laugh: No, pure projection, wishful thinking & well rotted steer manure........:laugh:
 
Into the Night said:
No. That article does NOT give Congress power to usurp elections from State legislatures.

Read this again...and again...and again...until it is chiseled into that thick skull of yours.
Click to expand...

Yes, it says Congress may make or alter election regulations made by states.

If Congress passes a law requiring citizenship for federal elections does that usurp state legislatures if the legislatures oppose that provision?


Into the Night 12/31/2020
Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing
 
Into the Night said:
Only certain very limited powers.

It is NOT the authority or the purpose of government to issue welfare money.
It is NOT the authority or the purpose of government to keep businesses open.
It is NOT the authority or the purpose of the federal government to issue welfare money.
It IS within the authority of the federal government to regulate immigration. Article I, $8.
Click to expand...

You illustrate my point perfectly. You don't like government performing certain functions but there is nothing in Article I, Section 8 giving government power to regulate immigration. Naturalization and immigration are not the same thing and you can't show where they are.

Even the SC case allowing immigration control did not use the naturalization clause as its unconstitutional decision because we know the SC cannot interpret the Constitution (in Into the Night's constitutional misinterpretation).

I am not against government regulating immigration, but there Constitution does not give government that power--my point being that it is ok to broadly interpret government's power if it is for something we want.
 
Into the Night said:
The federal government is authorized to implement immigration laws. See Article I, $8.
The federal government is NOT authorized to regulate air or water 'pollution'. Define 'pollution'. The word does not appear in the Constitution.
The President is authorized to conduct military action WITHOUT congressional approval. See Article II. Congress has authorized certain other powers for military action by the President. See Article I,$8. Vet health and educational benefits are authorized by the Constitution. See Article I, $8. It's part of raising armies and a navy. You know, they get weapons and bullets to do their job, and also get benefits just like any other organization might offer, as a reward for service to their countrymen. A compensation for their services.
Click to expand...


What provision in Article I, Section 8 involves immigration? In most of our nation's early history immigration was a function of the states under the 10th Amendment and Article I, Section 10.
 
Flash said:
Yes, it says Congress may make or alter election regulations made by states.
Click to expand...
No, it does not. Go read it again.
Flash said:
If Congress passes a law requiring citizenship for federal elections does that usurp state legislatures if the legislatures oppose that provision?
Click to expand...
Citizenship is already required for federal elections. Citizenship is already required in the States for State elections as well.
 
Flash said:
You illustrate my point perfectly.
Click to expand...
No, I disagree with your point.
Flash said:
You don't like government performing certain functions
Click to expand...
Irrelevant.
Flash said:
but there is nothing in Article I, Section 8 giving government power to regulate immigration.
Click to expand...
Yes there is.
Flash said:
Naturalization and immigration are not the same thing and you can't show where they are.
Click to expand...
They are part of the same thing. Immigration is part of naturalization.
Flash said:
Even the SC case allowing immigration control did not use the naturalization clause as its unconstitutional decision because we know the SC cannot interpret the Constitution (in Into the Night's constitutional misinterpretation).
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III.
Flash said:
I am not against government regulating immigration,
Click to expand...
Yes you are, liar. You've made that argument in the past.
Flash said:
but there Constitution does not give government that power-
Click to expand...
It does.
Flash said:
my point being that it is ok to broadly interpret government's power if it is for something we want.
Click to expand...
No.
 
Into the Night said:
No, it does not. Go read it again.

Citizenship is already required for federal elections. Citizenship is already required in the States for State elections as well.
Click to expand...


Not until Congress passed the law in 1996 requiring citizenship for voting in federal elections. "

"As of March 2020, two state constitutions specified that noncitizens may not vote in state and local elections: Arizona's and North Dakota's. No state constitutions explicitly allowed noncitizens to vote in state or local elections.

Ten municipalities across the country allowed noncitizens to vote in local elections as of March 2020. Nine were located in Maryland. The other was San Francisco, California."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top