^^Nothing but meaninglessness.Another meaningless thread that adds no value beyond one WACKY opinion previously held by a long-since deceased person.
^^Nothing but meaninglessness.Another meaningless thread that adds no value beyond one WACKY opinion previously held by a long-since deceased person.
^^Forum moron.It's amazing that you continue to believe that you are omnipotent and that you can simply declare of what others are unaware. Please remember that you don't even know what an atheist is.
Delusions of Grandeur.
That would make Jesus a coward. And Socrates as well.Suicide becomes escapist and an act of cowardice.
Giving your life for other people, or for a higher principle is not considered suicide.That would make Jesus a coward. And Socrates as well.
Jesus was warned and could have lived to a natural death. Socrates chose death, similarly defying the government. Willful suicides.Giving your life for other people, or for a higher principle is not considered suicide.
That's why Socrates, Jesus, and the soldier who willingly fell on a grenade to save friends are generally held in esteem
You didn't give any "fuck you" to indicate that you actually believe what you are posting.^^Forum moron.
Your free to call it whatever you want.Jesus was warned and could have lived to a natural death. Socrates chose death, similarly defying the government. Willful suicides.
So, they both chose to be put to death.Your free to call it whatever you want.
Jesus and Socrates both made clear their deaths were based on a higher principle, something that would either benefit other people, or serve the cause of truth and integrity.
To me that is qualitatively different than the dude who jumps in front of a train because his girlfriend broke up with him.
Dying for your beliefs or principles sounds like martyrdom to me.So, they both chose to be put to death.
Suicide is willful death.Dying for your beliefs or principles sounds like martyrdom to me.
I think Socrates, Saint Paul, and Alexei Navalny would rather have not been arrested and killed by state authorities.Suicide is willful death.
so he's pro-life and an atheist.The famous French Existentialist philosopher, Albert Camus, radicalized the question of whether life has any meaning.
Camus claims that the only fundamental philosophical question concerns whether one should commit suicide.
Behind this question is the concern that a meaningless (absurd) world might not be worth our living in.
Camus claims that life is absurd. A result is that all occurrences play out as if on a stage, devoid of reality or depth. This result turns out to be life’s “truth” for Camus.
Camus claims that true integrity involves living with absurdity and remaining open to the problems of absurdity.
Suicide becomes escapist and an act of cowardice.
Hope becomes delusional and equally escapist and cowardly.
Camus champions a continuing defiance, a heroic revolt in the face of life’s absurdity. Living as much as possible in the present is counseled—an anti-axial attitude.
If life is so lived, Camus believes that quantity of life will come to matter.
Source credit: Steven Erikson, Pomona College
Suicide is almost ALWAYS to end pain. Ending one's pain is every bit as good a reason for ending one's life as is "principle."I think Socrates, Saint Paul, and Alexei Navalny would rather have not been arrested and killed by state authorities.
Being willing to die for your principles is what makes martyrdom qualitatively different than the guy who kills himself because his wife divorced him.
As for myself, I'm going to have to go with what medical coroners call suicide.Suicide is almost ALWAYS to end pain. Ending one's pain is every bit as good a reason for ending one's life as is "principle."
I agree with that last part, Cypress.As for myself, I'm going to have to go with what medical coroners call suicide.
They are going to call a self inflicted gun shot by a depressed person a suicide.
I seriously don't think Alex Navalny, Socrates, or the US Marine who falls on a grenade to save buddies would be ruled suicides by medical coroners.
Which is a conundrum: Why don't most atheists commit suicide? Life is pain. We all die in the end. Why preserve the pain?The famous French Existentialist philosopher, Albert Camus, radicalized the question of whether life has any meaning.
Camus claims that the only fundamental philosophical question concerns whether one should commit suicide.
Behind this question is the concern that a meaningless (absurd) world might not be worth our living in.
Camus claims that life is absurd. A result is that all occurrences play out as if on a stage, devoid of reality or depth. This result turns out to be life’s “truth” for Camus.
Camus claims that true integrity involves living with absurdity and remaining open to the problems of absurdity.
Suicide becomes escapist and an act of cowardice.
Hope becomes delusional and equally escapist and cowardly.
Camus champions a continuing defiance, a heroic revolt in the face of life’s absurdity. Living as much as possible in the present is counseled—an anti-axial attitude.
If life is so lived, Camus believes that quantity of life will come to matter.
Source credit: Steven Erikson, Pomona College
Agreed. If there is hope that the pain will end, then it's a choice to endure or succumb. If there is no hope of ending pain, why not end it ASAP?Suicide is almost ALWAYS to end pain. Ending one's pain is every bit as good a reason for ending one's life as is "principle."
Navalny was probably murdered. Socrates was forced suicide under a death sentence. Some say he refused efforts to escape. The Marine would be suicide just like a kamikaze is suicide although both cases were for a perceived greater good.As for myself, I'm going to have to go with what medical coroners call suicide.
They are going to call a self inflicted gun shot by a depressed person a suicide.
I seriously don't think Alex Navalny, Socrates, or the US Marine who falls on a grenade to save buddies would be ruled suicides by medical coroners.
I would think the definition of suicide has to involve intent. I don't think Socrates or Saint Paul intended to die, and they would have rather continued their life. But they were presented with an impossible binary choice between death and corrupting their own purpose of life.Navalny was probably murdered. Socrates was forced suicide under a death sentence. Some say he refused efforts to escape. The Marine would be suicide just like a kamikaze is suicide although both cases were for a perceived greater good.
Agreed; intent to ends one life, but there are different reasons for doing so. The common one being to end pain be it physical or psychological. Socrates and Marines are different.I would think the definition of suicide has to involve intent. I don't think Socrates or Saint Paul intended to die, and they would have rather continued their life. But they were presented with an impossible binary choice between death and corrupting their own purpose of life.