DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
m-w.com
I resemble that remark.
Angry Mom!
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
I resemble that remark.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
No need to guess at my analysis, as its laid out logically in the winterborn=solitary thread. 
W
WinterBorn
Guest
m-w.com
I resemble that remark.
And was obviously said in sarcasm. But if that helps your fragile ego....
So no backup for the nervous breakdown either? lol
Ken posted this and won't respond to requests that he acknowledge that he was
a. lying, or
b. mistaken.
Instead, he lets Christiefan defend his error while he cries about too many polls.
Man up, Ken.
christiefan915
Catalyst
What's your real beef with Ken?
1, How does asking him to explain his bogus claim constitute a beef?
2. WTF is it to you?
christiefan915
Catalyst
1. It's not just asking him to explain, it's posting your comment multiple times on multiple threads. It's starting several threads with the same question. It's starting a flame war with the same question.
2. WTF? When I see an obsessive, stalking fixation like yours several things come to mind.
[a] You're a poster with a grudge dating from before you came to this board.
You're a current poster with a new name carrying a grudge, ergo, someone who's afraid to be honest.
[c] You take an unreasonable dislike to a poster so you launch a vendetta.
[d] You have psychological issues.
[e] You're supposedly a newbie with a week of actual posting time yet despite all the partisan rancor on this board, you've fixated on a single post by a person who's not even a frequent contributor.
[f] Your trollish behaviour hasn't drawn the condemnation of some of our best troll sniffers so maybe you're actually one of them.
I'm leaning toward [f]. But be that as it may, why should you be the only one here who can follow people around just to annoy them? If it's good enough for you, it's good enough for me.
